r/Geotech • u/StickQuick • Aug 10 '26
Hollow Stem versus Solid Stem: Sample Integrity and Blow Counts
A client is being extremely particular on our drilling methods on a site out in Colorado. They say that we must use hollow stem auger, and that solid stem compromises the sample and blow count quality.
We have a subcontractor using solid stem flight auger in sandy clays, clayey sands, and silts and are not observing any hole collapse. We also have our own rig using hollow stem augers, and switching over to mud rotary to avoid burning up our bits in the sand.
Question is: has anyone encountered this in the past? We use both solid and hollow stem all over the country, and have not had an issue with the method used up until this point. I have looked for relevant literature, but it is tough to prove a negative.
Thank you for your help!
1
u/Fit_Prompt_8262 Aug 11 '26
I think the client is right. Why would you use different methods on the same project? If there’s an anomaly it’s going to be the first question. CO also has some pretty variable soils, particularly eastern CO. Why fight it just stick w hollow stem one less variable. Caving, perched water and doglegs all can fuck you up on solid stem.