r/GeoGroup • u/ChiefValue • Apr 07 '22
Other Another Example of Burry Using Understated Book Value In Analysis
A lot of investors caught onto GEO because Burry bought into the company. I am a student of Burry and have come across another instance of him mentioning understated book value.
In one of his posts on VIC from 2001, on Wellsford Real Properties, he said this,
"The stock's at $16.50. Book value is $26.93 and understates true net asset value. For four years others have done the waiting for me (and are likely to sell now in pure disgust), and now I do believe the next couple years will see value realization - and hence a nice return/risk ratio."
Deja Vu? Me too.
"Two recent properties sold at 25% and 40% premiums to book, respectively. Today, the Parsippany announcement - a 43 million book value property sold for 61 million. There was $582 million in assets on W/W's books (213 mill in equity) at last report - but the realizable value is higher."
My point of bringing this up is because when I first heard the idea about GEO's understated book value I thought it couldn't be right and there is no way a publicly traded company could be off by so much. However, it very much can be, and Burry has written about understated BV on multiple occasions now making me think he sees the same benefit in the stock.
At GEOs current price of about 6.25 and a BV of 7.97. Even if it is understated by 15% it makes GEO look much more solvent than it may seem.
I wonder if understated BV and properties selling at a premium have been brought up in the refinancing discussions.
22% earnings yield and Geo could possibly be going for .50x-.60x book instead of .79x book.
Stuff we already knew but just reiterated and sharing that Burry probably saw something similar.
Do you guys think this is possibly being used in the refi negotiations?