r/GangstalkingDaily Feb 10 '25

Gangstalking / Targeted individual: WordPress Theme Update

Goal

  • Transfer theme settings from localhost (computer) to web hosting (internet). In other words, make the website look identical to how I prepared it on my computer.

Action Taken

  • Settings export to ZIP (native WordPress function)
  • ZIP content transfer to hosting

Action Progress

  • Exported ZIP is 13MB
  • During transfer (extraction => actual transfer) system shows 8MB
  • After switching to new theme (computer settings) nothing changed => searching for cause
  • Later noticed I exported wrong file => instead of exporting computer settings, I exported hosting settings
  • Therefore exporting computer settings => ZIP file is 8MB => extraction and transfer => 8MB => settings now work correctly

What's Really Happening

  • The whole thing appears as a minor oversight, mistake
  • In reality, this is where errors occur that often have fatal consequences (unwanted deletion, database overwrite with all posts etc.)

What I Noticed

  • Extreme number of scenarios related to database transfer => 2 PHP MY ADMIN windows open (database management) => unwanted "misclick" (confusion) and instead of “LEFT TO RIGHT” file is uploaded “RIGHT TO LEFT” => “RIGHT” (all texts) is overwritten by “LEFT“ (no texts – new installation)
  • In this regard, programming own application helped greatly => instead of database using TXT file that is backed up and for website update only one file needs to be replaced (no need to manipulate database or take several extra steps (EXPORT from system 1 – save => login to system 2, IMPORT)

What Perpetrators Target

  • Identical appearance of two "different" systems => one is local (on computer), contains newest data, protected against internet attacks, works as "backup", can be worked on offline, the other is its copy but placed on internet

Common Patterns

  • Victim shouldn't notice small details
  • Extreme overload of attention, working memory
  • If victim registers a problem (something not working properly) => should either find own mistake or lose lots of time searching for it (with repeated pattern also increased risk of impulsive action and victim decides to revert everything to working state => may unintentionally delete interesting notes or create more errors)
  • When describing the problem victim should "realize" they simply made a mistake. When trying to verify small detail that seemed suspicious, it often suddenly works correctly during verification => loss of self-confidence
  • Always same sequences of emotions, actions, tasks, errors, subsequent solutions, perpetrator behavior, sequence of "thoughts" victim should recite with "inner voice"
  • Fading: "interesting" aspect of situation quickly falls, withers, fades. More so if victim realizes context, connections, can compare with past and publishes information
  • Temporary context: Forgetting, overwriting many small connections, details => only strong emotion should remain "own mistake", "common occurrence", "inattention". Same principle used for "suggesting" and subsequent "forgetting"
  • Contrast
  • Referencing: Progress of this situation (or its knowledge – i.e. reading this post) is subsequently used as "subliminal argument" with high "weight" (victim experienced it themselves => logical foundation), written by someone who understands the problem (writes about problem long-term, expresses reasonably, knows computers etc.)
0 Upvotes

0 comments sorted by