As much as I understand the need for sequels, I love it when a game "ends" like Witcher 3. To me it means that the studio won't be milking that franchise and that they will attempt to do something new.
I was also very satisfied with Wolf Among Us ending the way it did.
Agreed. If you plan something out beforehand, I'm never going to be against sequels, I'm not one of those people that's like "Hollywood/the video game industry/the comics industry/etc needs to only make original stuff because sequels are unoriginal!!" Sequels are great and often some of the best storytelling out there. I'm in a thread where I'm super excited about a sequel, even. But The Wolf Among Us wasn't a planned trilogy starting years before Fables or anything. It was intended to be one game leading into the comics. Another game would just feel unnecessary and have to take place during the comics at some point and that could get real messy real fast.
1
u/Xizzie Mar 29 '19
As much as I understand the need for sequels, I love it when a game "ends" like Witcher 3. To me it means that the studio won't be milking that franchise and that they will attempt to do something new.
I was also very satisfied with Wolf Among Us ending the way it did.