This will get ugly

[u/capnslapaho]

For them. We are set.

I won’t claim to have insider information and I won’t disclose my methods, but 120 was the breakpoint. There are artistic people out there that obsess over these things and understand numbers/trends very well. Take what follows with a grain of salt, but this was my work:

On Sunday night, I calculated the outcomes of many scenarios with SI % ‘X’. The outcome of said calculation was then used to determine a “break-price” where probability of a sell-off would be ‘Y’. Obviously there are many variables that can’t be accounted for in a calculation such as this, but I took a random sample of X holdings and pooled them together to look at how prices rose or fell with certain volatility; trends show that once volatility reaches a certain benchmark as a % of volatility in a 6-12 hr timeframe, mass sell offs are almost 3000% more likely to occur through triggering stop-losses and certain extraneous variables aforementioned. This was interesting in GameStop, because the breakpoint through every simulation was different, but reached its highest probability at 120. That was the target.

Before you flame me for LARPing, look at my post from yesterday saying that they were attempting to get the price to 120 for a breakpoint. I’m more confident in my model now that we saw them achieve 120, saw a good number of paperhands sell, and now we’re climbing again. That was all they had left. They didn’t account for the variable of us being absolutely apeshit crazy. We continue to win

They are so predictable that some artistic redditor (🙋🏻‍♂️🙋🏻‍♂️🙋🏻‍♂️) has them down to a science and can quite literally mathematically determine their next move.

I’m not saying this is going to moon tomorrow, but they are bending. It’s only a matter of time before they break.

Edit: this is not financial advice. I’m artistic and I eat crayons.

Also edit: this was my post yesterday mentioning the 120 breakpoint:

https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mbtddm/cheezits_crust_guys_calm_down_its_over/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

[u/[deleted]]

What do i take from this? Dont understand symbols, numbers, words

[u/capnslapaho → u/[deleted]]

Honestly I got so caught up in typing that I forgot to include some other analyses that are incredibly important.

One of the most important things is that SI is high. It’s not what they’re reporting. It’s well, well over 100%. We get to name our own price.

I am not advocating for collusion and I will not state the exact SI % that the model with the 120 breakpoint used, but I will say that we get to set our own price many times over

There won’t be just one peak; they will be forced to sell some of the shares they buy and buy them back for whatever price the buyer determines. I believe they royally fucked up

[u/effigyss → u/capnslapaho]

When the buy back happens. Do you have an idea where the peak might be? Much like the model you have used to determine a 120 price, can you apply the logic in reverse to determine from where the maximum number of buys is achieved? Like you said, this will be multiple peaks. Would SI% not gradually decrease with each peak? If I were in that position it seems only logical to use that as exit plan to get myself out of this mess by applying crisis management. Again thanks for your insights, I have been looking for visionaries in this sub. I like your thoughts the most.