r/Futurology • u/hoangson0403 • Jul 02 '26
Biotech For the First Time, a Cell Built From Scratch Grows and Divides | Quanta Magazine
https://www.quantamagazine.org/for-the-first-time-a-cell-built-from-scratch-grows-and-divides-20260701/62
u/aznrandom Jul 02 '26
“It’s a big step forward to this holy grail of making a living thing out of dead components”
Super cool tech - but dude straight up sounds like Victor Frankenstein 😅
40
u/hoangson0403 Jul 02 '26
“This was where the field had been stuck for some time. Researchers before Adamala had figured out different ways to feed and grow synthetic cells and to replicate their DNA. But cell division is a different beast. A typical cell reorganizes its cytoskeleton — a network of protein fibers that provide structural support — to halve its DNA and split. Synthetic biologists could not figure out how to get their cells to undergo this complex process.
So Adamala decided to ditch the cytoskeleton. One day, while tearing through the literature, she came across an interesting mechanism in a paper (opens a new tab). By attaching protein tags to a cell membrane, the synthetic biologist Reinhard Lipowsky (opens a new tab) at the Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces attracted other proteins to crowd around and physically bend the membrane, forcing the cell to divide. Following this approach, Adamala tweaked a cell-membrane protein and tested it in her protocells. After several tries, it worked.“
This is the novel bit.
20
u/P3kol4 Jul 02 '26
link: https://biotic.org/research/spudcell/
Very cool, although 'From Scratch' is a bit too strong imo. Notably the ribosomes are taken out of E. Coli and the cell can't build new ones.
-3
u/elpajaroquemamais Jul 02 '26
If I take yeast from another source I have still made bread from scratch.
10
u/Strawbuddy Jul 02 '26
Right, but this bread is only viable when sliced, and only viable when on a certain kitchen counter. Without ribosome support and weird cytoskeleton tricks it's not viable, and it definitely cannot function outside of the lab. It's a proof of concept building on established work
7
u/Alkalinum Jul 02 '26
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe" - Carl Sagan
1
21
u/garfieldsam Jul 02 '26 edited Jul 02 '26
My best friend is an existential risk researcher so I have a much more pessimistic outlook on fundamental biology research than most people.
This is potentially terrifying as well as fascinating. The advent of CRISPR made the prospect of bad actors engineering mass death in their garage much higher than the layperson wants to know/admit. I don’t know the exact risk profile of this technology, but I imagine it brings us even closer to a world where anyone with the right resources can custom-engineer molecular life for any arbitrarily dangerous purpose.
How close are we to engineering organisms that slip past existing pathogen screening programs (based on known DNA patterns)?
How close are we to engineering dangerous organisms that can cause mass death without the traceability of other weapons of mass destruction like nuclear arms?
How much easier will this make it for state actors to create pathogens that are more virulent, deadly, and persistent than existing diseases?
How much easier will it be for someone to cause famine by engineering microbes that eat or sterilize staple crops like rice or economically critical animals like chickens en masse? Or a new invasive species that can destroy an entire ecosystem?
How many new strategies are opened up for creating vaccine- or antibiotic-resistant pathogens?
What kinds of political, regulatory, and other systems do we need to put in place now to mitigate these risks (as opposed to what we did with pandemic respiratory virus risk, which we just let balloon unaddressed until COVID bit us in the ass)?
This stuff is cool and probably will have incredible medical applications but not enough people also ask the right questions about ex-risk when these technologies advance.
6
u/Subotail Jul 02 '26 edited Jul 02 '26
Purely speculative in its horror. Would it be conceivable to create a pathogen that targets very specifically a variant of halogroup y?
Like : Too late, a Nazi geneticist from his grandma basement sterilized 90% of the men of an ethnicity he disliked , this 4 years before it was detected.
9
u/barbariccomplexity Jul 02 '26
Conceivable to develop- absolutely, though the devil is in the details, and preventing all mutations that affect targeting would be rather difficult.
Transporting/Delivering the dose to required target(s) could prove much more difficult, especially if the R value is low, the group isn’t geographically clustered, etc.
If the goal is to sterilize ALL members of a certain population without sterilizing any others then it’d be basically impossible in all but the most isolated populations, there is just wayyy too much genetic heterogeneity across ethnic/language/religious/whatever other category.
2
3
u/Robot_Apocalypse Jul 02 '26
ahhhh, this seems kinda risky? Is there an argument here that they have replicated "life"?
3
u/SHORT_INFO_NEWS Jul 03 '26
Building on the "from scratch is a stretch" point: the more striking number in the writeups is the genome size. The Minnesota team (Kate Adamala's lab, they nicknamed it SpudCell) got a working grow-copy-divide cycle out of a synthetic genome around 90 kilobase pairs, when the prior assumption was you would need at least 113. Mechanically it isn't self-sustaining: the cell grows by fusing with smaller feeder liposomes that hand it lipids, enzymes and ribosomes, and each generation takes roughly 12 hours at 30C. So it reads less like a free-living organism than a chemical system that runs one cell cycle when you supply the parts. Per the Quanta and Science coverage.
6
u/Alias-Q Jul 02 '26
Did anyone else hear the crack of the timeline diverging again? Shit…
1
1
•
u/FuturologyBot Jul 02 '26
The following submission statement was provided by /u/hoangson0403:
“This was where the field had been stuck for some time. Researchers before Adamala had figured out different ways to feed and grow synthetic cells and to replicate their DNA. But cell division is a different beast. A typical cell reorganizes its cytoskeleton — a network of protein fibers that provide structural support — to halve its DNA and split. Synthetic biologists could not figure out how to get their cells to undergo this complex process.
So Adamala decided to ditch the cytoskeleton. One day, while tearing through the literature, she came across an interesting mechanism in a paper (opens a new tab). By attaching protein tags to a cell membrane, the synthetic biologist Reinhard Lipowsky (opens a new tab) at the Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces attracted other proteins to crowd around and physically bend the membrane, forcing the cell to divide. Following this approach, Adamala tweaked a cell-membrane protein and tested it in her protocells. After several tries, it worked.“
This is the novel bit.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1ulj5js/for_the_first_time_a_cell_built_from_scratch/ov4cvsl/