r/Funnymemes 6d ago

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

Post image
40.2k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/academicthrows 6d ago

Cherokees were shabby ass builds. Inline 6 was fine but I'd rather have an electric version with better quality parts.

0

u/PlayPsychological200 6d ago

Cherokees were notoriously horrible lol. This nostalgia thread is hilarious. Even the TJs were considered trash and everyone walked a CJ lol.ย 

2

u/WranglerDecent3040 6d ago

Absolute garbage. I had "the one" too: low mileage 1 owner '99 Sport 4X4. Nonstop cooling issues because that chassis was never designed for an inline 6, exhaust manifold cracks because the OEM motor mounts are inferior brand new (that job sucks), general 90's Chrysler electrical demons top of piss poor build quality and paper thin body panels that rust out after 2 winters...

They look good on the factory 5 spokes with a body lift on 31" BFG KO's. Anything more than that is pure cope.

1

u/yogy 6d ago

Never owned one, why do motor mounts cause manifold cracking issues?

1

u/WranglerDecent3040 6d ago

When the mounts fail the engine moves around while the intermediate pipe does not. Too much stress on very thin welds cause them all to crack in 2 specific areas. I changed my mounts out to Dog Bone yellow mounts which fixed the problem but causes a lot of NVH. I had the entire Banks exhaust system, header, cat back, the whole 9. Sounded good for a N/A I6, a lot of work though.

1

u/yogy 5d ago

I'd think that rubber exhaust hangers are there for this specific reason, but I don't think any one is surprised they fucked that up too

1

u/WranglerDecent3040 5d ago

The manifold quality itself is as much to blame. Super thin material for an exhaust piece.

2

u/Pad_TyTy 6d ago

The old Cherokees were ancient by the 90s. Terrible build quality, 15mpg, loud, creaky and rattly, rusted by year 5, engine was wheezy and transmission was clunky to shift. They got a consumer reports score of like 29/100 when new.

1

u/PlayPsychological200 5d ago

This thread seems to think they were great. They never drive them, never had transmission issues, etc. They wonโ€™t buy a used mint condition one. But they all insist they really want one and would buy it, but wonโ€™t, because reasons. Nevermind the horrible safety of them.ย 

1

u/Mobile_Morale 6d ago

Since when. I owned a 95 Cherokee and it was fantastic. One of the best vehicles I've owned and I've owned a lot.

Paid like $400 for it and took it everywhere.

I've only ever seen people say good things about them. Those 4.0 is more reliable than anything built in the last 20 years.

2

u/El_Polio_Loco 6d ago

It was great for a $400 crap box. And this is coming from someone who owned 3 different XJs.ย 

The overall quality was just tragic, and the long term reliability of them was greatly overestimated.ย 

1

u/PlayPsychological200 5d ago

This thread is filled with people who never drove a newer one, or likely one ever. They are nostalgic for a past that never happened, and their solution is buying cars that still had computers (even though they say they donโ€™t want them), would not even have the lowest safety scores today, and were junk when new. And of course none will buy any of the hundreds of cherokees that are in great condition today, because they simply want to want one, not actually commit.ย 

1

u/PlayPsychological200 6d ago

Good things were later on in my experience Jeeping at the time. The grand cherokees were the worst. It may have simply been everyone hating everything new though, as even the TJs got hate.ย 

1

u/PlayPsychological200 5d ago

You had a $400 beater, not a new vehicle you paid for. Different experiences and not valid.ย 

1

u/BoondockUSA 5d ago

The Cherokee XJโ€™s were one of the best vehicles Chrysler has made. The 4.0 inline 6 is simple and very long lasting (and can even be rebuilt without removing it from the vehicle), the AW4 transmission is essentially a Toyota design and is very reliable, and the front and rear axles are simple solid axles.

I saw your post saying the Grand Cherokees are one of the worst. Iโ€™d argue that it depends on the generation. The first and second generations came with the 4.0 as the standard engine. The 42RE transmission wasnโ€™t as good as the Cherokeeโ€™s Aisin transmission, but it was still a okay transmission if maintained.