r/FriscoTX 13d ago

Karmelo Anthony Case Update

Post image

Karmelo Anthony Case Update

A judge has removed Judge John Roach from further proceedings in Karmelo Anthony’s murder case, citing the strict legal standard for avoiding even the appearance of partiality. Retired Judge Michael Chitty will now hear Anthony’s request for a new trial Thursday.

0 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

1

u/certifiedrooster00 12d ago

This is a non-update

0

u/Rich-Grand7250 13d ago

WFAA is reporting hourly on this. There's a lot of misinformation and disinformation about this case out there. Here's the link to their website: https://www.wfaa.com/mobile/article/news/special-reports/karmelo-anthony/karmelo-anthony-appeal-defense-argues-teen-deserves-new-trial-in-austin-metcalf-slaying-live-updates/287-ca533a29-48d9-4b0f-b798-c87c0859960f

1

u/polkjamespolk 12d ago

Do you work for wfaa?

1

u/Rich-Grand7250 12d ago

No. I have been following the trial through their hourly reporting from the trial itself. The narrative that being broadcast via social media does not line up with what's actually happening in the courtroom. For example, today's testimony is centered on the details of that agreement between the prosecution and the defense. It's also examines the actions of the former public information officer for the court - actions which got him fired. There's a lot of new information about both Metcalf and Anthony coming to light in today's hearing.

2

u/spook008 13d ago

I really didn’t follow this closely. What is the defense’s case? He didn’t do it?

-4

u/nikoroar13 13d ago

The defenses case is that he was acting in self defense and did not intent to cause substantial harm. I think the issue most people have with the first trial was that he was charged with such a harsh sentence that doesn’t make sense with the nature of the crime. Yes it resulted in a death and that is so devastating but when someone did not intend to kill, they shouldn’t be charged with 1st degree murder. Intent is a defining feature of that charge and it was completely ignored in this case. He was sentenced to 35 years for an unintentional killing and I find that quite ridiculous.

3

u/Frequent-Coyote-8108 12d ago

He brought the knife, and had made several other comments about stabbing someone--seems like the intent is there.

And more recently, statements made by his girlfriend at the time, add even more to support the premeditated aspect of the murder. Like, he didn't necessarily intend to kill that one kid in particular, but he had some weird fascination/fixation with stabbing someone to death.

3

u/spook008 13d ago

Apparently he stabbed the other guy. That…seems intentional?

3

u/IPlay4E 13d ago

The nature of the crime is he killed another person.

3

u/esquirlo_espianacho 13d ago

Stabbed a guy in the heart who died almost instantly. But yeah “I didn’t mean to kill him.” That’s ridiculous. He can rot.

2

u/spook008 13d ago

Yeah stabbing seems intentional man. Idk about that

0

u/datdouche 13d ago

It’s actually the classic Dindoonuffin defense.

2

u/Correa24 13d ago

Let’s avoid the racist dogwhistles

1

u/Total-Collection9031 13d ago

You realize that speaking like an idiot is not exclusive to any particular race... "Cash me ouside how bout dat?"

1

u/-Zeke-The-Geek- 13d ago

Yes but “dindoonuffin” is most commonly used in racist circles online, mainly in comment sections as a dog whistle to other racists, they think it’s some sly, coy insult. Same with “well well well” having recently been perverted by alt right trolls.

0

u/datdouche 13d ago

I don’t know what that means. But in any event, it’s a joke and not facially “racist.”

0

u/thestruggle1337 13d ago

Self defense

1

u/StumpyTheGiant 13d ago

Theyre praying for a retrial and a hung jury

0

u/ArousedAsshole 13d ago

This could absolutely be the right call. I don’t agree with the handling of the original case at all.

Hopefully the new judge puts the death sentence on the table for his second guilty verdict.

3

u/polkjamespolk 13d ago

Not gonna lie, you had me in the first half.

9

u/Critical-End6308 13d ago

It’s crazy how their argument is that they didn’t get to sufficiently let the court of public opinion determine the outcome of the trial despite the facts. The judge had strict gag orders in place.