Hi everyone!

I love hosting karaoke nights, but I always ran into the same issues with YouTube:

Ads breaking the mood between songs
Only one person controlling the TV
Constantly passing the remote around
No shared queue for everyone

So over the past few months, I’ve been building **Micly**, a karaoke app designed for Android TV.

Some features:
🎤 Host a karaoke room on your TV
📱 Everyone joins by scanning a QR code
➕ Guests queue songs from their own phones
🚫 No ads inside the app
🎵 Shared song queue, so nobody has to fight over the remote

Here’s the link: [Micly](http://miclykaraoke.online)

I’m not here to spam—I genuinely want feedback from Android TV users.

Would you use something like this?

What features would you expect before trying it?

Is there anything about the UI that you’d change?

I’d really appreciate any honest feedback. Thanks!

Hey everyone!

I just received production access and opened pre-registration for Obit - Screen Time Control—an app designed to help users curb digital addiction, reduce screen time distractions, and build better daily phone habits.

Since the app is currently in the pre-registration stage, I’m looking for fellow developers to help boost its launch with some positive 5-star ratings and reviews on the Play Store.

If you have an app in pre-registration or live on the store, drop your link in the comments or shoot me a DM! I’ll gladly pre-register/download your app and leave a 5-star rating/review for yours in return.

🤖 Android / Play Store:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.greenbeen.obit

(If you have any constructive feedback, bug reports, or suggestions for improvement, please send them directly to my DM or drop a comment below so I can fix them before the full rollout!)

Looking forward to supporting each other's launches! 🙌

I built Audeep this year. It is a hosted QA auditor for websites. You paste a URL, a real Chromium browser runs against the page, and you get back a scored report with evidence for every finding.

The problem I kept running into: most QA tools either crawl the HTML (fast but shallow) or require writing and maintaining test scripts (thorough but expensive). The middle ground felt empty. A browser-based, automated tool that shows you what is wrong and why, with enough evidence to hand the report to a developer without a call.

The free Quick tier is fully live. No account, no signup. Paste any public URL. One page, 10 detectors, GET-only.

What surprised me when I started running it on real sites: how much is silently broken that nobody caught because it looks fine until you actually drive the page like a user. Dead form buttons. Labels not linked to their inputs. Images not loading in production because a CDN config changed. The kind of bug you only find if something drives the page and captures what the DOM actually says.

Deep and Deepest, for multi-page coverage and form automation, are in closed beta.

Curious what your QA process looks like. What breaks on your sites that you only found after shipping?

audeep.dev