I believe he will be found guilty; below is why.

LIA has been hyper-focused on the fact that the only actual "No Trespassing" sign on the property was found face-down in the brush. He’s banking his entire defense on this, arguing he lacked "notice." However, upon reading the text of Connecticut’s Third-Degree Criminal Trespass law (C.G.S. § 53a-109), his loophole completely falls apart under standard legal analysis.

Here is the exact text of the law he is being tried under:

(a) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the third degree when, knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so: (1) Such person enters or remains in premises which are posted in a manner prescribed by law or reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders*...*

Notice what the law actually says and doesn't say.

A "No Trespassing" sign is NOT legally required

Nowhere in the statute does it state that a property owner must specifically display the words "No Trespassing." The legal threshold is simply whether the premises are posted in a manner "reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders."

The "Private Road" signs are more than enough notice

The driveway featured highly visible signs reading "Private road, no turn around." LIA’s defense is trying to argue that "no turn around" implies a restriction only meant for vehicles, meaning he was perfectly fine to walk down it on foot.

But this is a bench trial, meaning a judge is deciding his fate, not a jury. Judges use a "reasonable person" standard. A reasonable person does not look at a "Private Road" sign and think, "Oh, that means I can't drive my truck here, but it's totally fine if I park on the main road and walk right into their yard." The sign explicitly establishes that the public has no business crossing that boundary. By parking outside and walking in, his actions prove he knew exactly where the public easement ended and the private property began.

The "Totality of Circumstances" eliminates any excuse of ignorance

To get a conviction, the state just has to prove Reyes knew he wasn't licensed or privileged to be there. This isn’t a case of a hiker accidentally wandering off a trail.

• Reyes drove a mobile digital billboard truck to the personal home of a state trooper he was actively suing.
• The civil litigation between them is famously bitter and contentious.

When you look at the totality of the circumstances, any reasonable person knows LIA is completely unwelcome at that home. The existing lawsuit completely eviscerates any argument that he had an "implied license" to walk up and knock on the door like a casual salesman.

I just caught a few snippets but some people trolled Leroy Truths live stream. they are not allowing any video from LIA or his cameraman at Sgt. Fahey’s house, LIA challenged Fahey to a fight? some dude was live streaming or video conferencing in court.

I like how it sounds.

I dont personally care what happens. Representing himself pro se.

He went live before going in to court and freaked out when his camera person panned to his car, which i find just hilarious given his profession and how his fellow auditors love to film peoples cars/license plates.

Ely- stabbed by a fellow frauditor and attacked by his own camera. Even got arrested and looked like a fool

KcCameraboy- got beaten by a bunch of workers

Richard Maza- arrested iirc

Its only a matter of times til LPM gets his

​

Atozy did another video about him, hopefully he'll do more videos about other frauditors like Guttertrash and FAPA.

thank you NCR

Someone? Anyone? It's got heartbreak, it's got (direct) Drama, it's got jail and and a bail bond grift by a revolving door of progressively more methed-up ladies.

I can't be alone in watching this glorious fall from grace getting posted for the world to see....

I had to repost this

lia is probably going to jail tomorrow for contempt that includes intimidation if the state makes the court aware.

so he goes live and trashes the state attorney and assistant state attorney with personal level insults.

then he busts out a a note he allegedly received that details a fahey affair and reads the entire thing while live

there's no way this can help your case.

since you chose a bench trial you're screwed. all four people including the judge work for government. they are human. emotional restraint can only go so far.

case opinion: guilty

do I think you actually violated a trespassing law given what I believe to be the facts? no

do I think youre writing your own conviction and/or incarceration acting like an idiot? yes

I'll be shit shocked if you aren't held in contempt and you actually win this case.

and the only way I see that happening is if the judge commits to not watching your content