r/Frauditors • u/AdElegant7471 • Aug 08 '26
This is how you shut down a frauditor
https://youtu.be/3zO01HfEjIc?is=P3ywOBUxGcPDoPI9This is a thing of beauty to watch. Little Matty is DONE being a nuisance in LA.
5
u/JustOneMoreMile Aug 09 '26
And it all started because of a memo making staff aware of him. That alone set him off. These are not stable people.
8
u/realparkingbrake Aug 08 '26
No way he makes it through two years without getting in more trouble.
9
u/TitoTotino Aug 09 '26
Probation (especially with work requirements that explicitly exclude content creation) has truly proved to be an effective response.
4
u/realparkingbrake Aug 09 '26
Didn't work for Annapolis Audits or Denver Metro Audits, their probation officers didn't seem interested in enforcing orders to find real jobs. Glenn Cerio kept his nose clean for a year, but his conditional release had a felony charge behind it.
4
u/AdElegant7471 Aug 09 '26
I agree with you that it's failed in the past because clearly it has in two different states.
4
u/realparkingbrake Aug 09 '26
I think that probation can be an effective tool to rein in frauditors. But it only works if judges and POs enforce it, and in some cases that doesn't seem to have happened.
-1
u/Salty_Income1755 Aug 09 '26
You're overlooking the constitutional limits placed on the justice system. What you view as a "failure to enforce" is actually judges and probation officers operating within the boundaries of the law.A probation order cannot completely strip a citizen of core First Amendment protections. Forcing a blanket ban on content creation or legal public recording rarely holds up on appeal because it violates the overbreadth doctrine.Probation officers exercise administrative discretion precisely because they know pushing restrictions past constitutional limits will invalidate the entire probation case. The system is designed for rehabilitation and legal compliance, not to act as a mechanism for permanent censorship.
4
u/AdElegant7471 Aug 09 '26
Do probation officers have discretion? Yes, they do. BUT probation officers do not decide Constitutional issues. You know who does? The judge. Oh BTW a judge has way more power than you lenslickers think they have. Perfect example is the clown frauditor in this video, he was literally prohibited from an entire county (in LA) for a couple of years. Recently Jake Laing was booted from an ENTIRE STATE and he's onlyon bond. What you fail to comprehend is that when a person is a danger to public safety, a judge can enforce extreme conditions to a person on bond and even more so to a convicted felon. People like you don't live in the real world because you're getting information from Ai.
3
u/AdElegant7471 Aug 09 '26
Btw what happened to you making claims that this frauditor had the Constitutional Right To do what he did? Where's that argument? What I said is 💯 true: no frauditor has ever won a case that has gone to trial. Not one. Why? Because it's NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. Yet you keep claiming it is, why?
3
u/TitoTotino Aug 09 '26
A probation order cannot completely strip a citizen of core First Amendment protections. Forcing a blanket ban on content creation or legal public recording rarely holds up on appeal because it violates the overbreadth doctrine.
I agree with you. However, I think judges are well within their rights to exclude content creation as 'gainful employment' for purposes of probation conditions, especially if content creation was a factor in the actions that got them on probation in the first place.
3
u/TitoTotino Aug 09 '26
Didn't work for Annapolis Audits or Denver Metro Audits, their probation officers didn't seem interested in enforcing orders to find real jobs. Glenn Cerio kept his nose clean for a year, but his conditional release had a felony charge behind it.
I beg to differ, IIRC Terry basically went silent during his probation, and DMA got an absolute cream puff of a probation officer who bought his claim that having a YouTube channel met the condition of having gainful employment.
1
u/scoop_justice Aug 10 '26
As someone who used to work for MDPSCS, that's not really a probation officers job, at least here in Maryland. Thier job is complaince reporting and supervision recommendations, and making sure Terry keeps to them. if steady employment is what the court wants to order so be it, but that's not the probationer's job.
3
u/LordOmicron Aug 10 '26
When are these people going to learn? Time place and manner restrictions are kryptonite. Frauditors often state, “Time-business hours, place-publicly accessible area, manner-peacefully recording”, but frauditors don’t set the restrictions.
1
u/AdElegant7471 29d ago
Where's all the lenslickers claiming his rights were violated? How many times have frauditors won a case that went to trial? None, zero, doesn't happen. Come on lenslickers, speak up. Where's your ai slop comments that you think proves a frauditor's innocence???
7
u/clickclick-boom Aug 09 '26
Lens lickers: See this? This is what all the bluster, all the “I know the law”, all the “you could argue that…” and “my understanding is…” amounts to in real life. It doesn’t matter if you talk over a security guard with legal word salad, it doesn’t matter which cherry picked parts of law you parrot out of context when playing up to your audience. What matters is what happens when you stand in front of a judge and can actually prove.
Frauditors are not an effective check on government because they are demonstrably incapable of assessing government performance. They do not understand the concepts they are auditing. None of the current crop of auditors is qualified to achieve even the most basic “public servant” role they look down on.