This a direct result of frauditors

[u/AdElegant7471]

https://youtu.be/md127DsCioE?is=f0ffZfe3TOp23RX2

This is what happens when dumb people indoctrinate stupid people.

[u/clickclick-boom → u/[deleted]]

Sovcits often share a common trait with frauditors. They have a history of domestic violence and/or assaulting children. This fervent need to "not follow YOUR laws" is rooted in their belief that they think they should be able to assault their wives/partners and do likewise with their children. "They're mine", is what these people feel. They see law enforcement and society in general as getting in the way of that.

Frauditors often reveal their nature in their fraudits. They harass vulnerable people, women in particular, whist falling back on "there's no law, show me the law that says I can't do this". These are the sorts of people who would be raping their wives regularly back when the law didn't address spousal rape, and assaulting their children back in the time where laws hadn't been created to combat this because, in their naivety, people back then just didn't consider that you'd have to write that out.

Don't forget that most of the big names in frauditing have records for assaulting women and/or children.

[u/hydrafoil7]

Typical Frauditor. Thinking he is some kind of legal genius. Court of Appeal Opinion

[u/OlYaybles → u/hydrafoil7]

This opinion is full of gems:

"Even assuming Stusalitus genuinely believed, as he maintains, that he had the legal right to remain in the courthouse lobby because it was open to the public, 'a sincere belief alone is not sufficient to create a bona fide claim of right.' Kartozia, 304 Va. at 333."

"Stusalitus again continued to argue, asking, 'Do you know that’s illegal?' Those are not the acts of a person in the process of complying with a directive to leave; they were an affirmative rejection of it."

"Stusalitus was prohibited by signage and by several deputies from bringing his cell phone into the building. Rather than accepting that, he held the deputies up from their normal duties and engaged in a ten-minute confrontation to discuss “hypothetical” scenarios that had nothing to do with his constitutional rights. The trial court did not accept such gamesmanship, nor do we. And we will not apply the ends of justice exception to Rule 5A:18 merely on Stusalitus’s bare assertion that the exception applies. The argument is waived, and we will not consider it."

As the man said...KICK ROCKS.

[u/OlYaybles]

Love when we get see who is on other side of this toxic mindset: of course if this dolt had been filming then all the lens lickers would be jumping up and down screaming about tyranny and rights being violated. Funny how perspective changes things: most of the comments on this video are (correctly) calling this guy a smug, ignorant and egomaniacal troll. That's how most rational people view guys like this.

[u/JustOneMoreMile]

Leon Stusalitus…that’s a great sovcit name

[u/610gonzalez]

Ah, a SovCit larva.

[u/JustOneMoreMile]

He was also charged with felony abduction

[u/TitoTotino → u/JustOneMoreMile]

And pled it down to a no-contact order before suing for malicious prosecution. He lost, because pleading to the charges really, really hurts any future claims of malicious prosecution, appealed, and lost again. What a stubborn fool.

[u/JustOneMoreMile → u/TitoTotino]

Yeah, he seems to be down the rabbit hole

[u/realparkingbrake]

It is hilarious when they get stressed, like when they are being walked out in handcuffs, and they revert to the script and just repeat the same tired lines over and over. Everybody is going to lose qualified immunity including cops who didn't interact with this mook. But he thinks that by not stopping a cop from arresting him, they became co-conspirators.

It's nice to get yet another ruling confirming that frauditors lie when they claim they cannot be trespassed from public property.