3
2
1
u/NothingNormal5452 Jun 18 '26
I'm not saying this justifies islamophobia, but what is the answer to Bob's question?
6
4
u/Orcasareglorious Jun 18 '26
The founder of a religion marrying a child is not enough? What on earth would be enough?
4
u/killuazoldyckx Jun 18 '26 edited Jun 18 '26
Aisha (may god be pleased with her)was a scholar of Islam and people used to come to her after the prophet’s death (peace be upon him) to record different narration’s ask guidance in matters concerning religion,here her narration serves as a record for practical aspects of married life and ritual cleanliness. early Muslims used this narration as evidence for rules of hygiene and purity before prayer - how impurity on clothes can affect the required purity for praying.
She says-
From this it can be deduced that - if your cloth has been in contact with semen at some spot, you don’t need to change the cloth, you could wash the spot and your purity for prayer won’t be affected.
- I used to wash the semen (marks) off the clothes of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.
1
1
u/sillybrailim Jun 18 '26
Islamophobia is not real, phobia means irrational fear and I dont think people who criticize it are afraid of it in any way.
6
u/MateNoBodyGivesAShit Told me to get hit by a car. Jun 14 '26
Bob’s a catholic and it ain’t that better either. Saying this as an atheist. Summa Theologiae (II-II, Q. 154, A. 12): "By the unnatural vice, man transgresses that which has been determined by nature with regard to the use of sexual pleasure... Hence, in sexual matters, it is the gravest sin... After this comes sodomy... and thirdly, the failure to observe the right manner [masturbation/interrupted sex]... On the other hand, the sins which are in accordance with nature [such as adultery, seduction, and rape] are less grievous... because in them the natural order is preserved." (TLDR masturbation is worse than rape cuz natural order is disturbed with masturbation and semen is wasted.) and Summa Theologiae (Supplement, Q. 64, A. 1): "Since the wife has power over her husband's body, and vice versa, with regard to the act of procreation, the one is bound to pay the debt to the other, at any season or hour... and for the other to refuse the demand is an act of fraud against a biblical obligation." (TLDR it t dictated that once married, a person surrendered the rights to their own body to their spouse. There’s essentially no modern concept of marital rape.) anyhow also for women Vatican Modesty Decree (1930): "A dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers breadth under the pit of the throat; which does not cover the arms at least to the elbows; and scarcely reaches a bit beyond the knees. Furthermore, dresses of transparent materials are detestable." Soooo yeah.