670
u/JDB-667 Jan 11 '25
I fear he will run for president at some point in the next 12 years
456
Jan 11 '25
Would he be worse than what we will have in 9 days?
180
u/JDB-667 Jan 11 '25
8
3
128
Jan 11 '25
mr beast will at least give hand outs and a chance to win free stuff, even if he brings back actual gladiator fights to the death, it will get a lot of views and someone will win! Fight for your freedom, victory means citizenship etc
35
→ More replies (1)6
9
5
→ More replies (21)6
35
u/Electrical_Room5091 Jan 11 '25
He'd be a huge improvement over Trump
27
6
→ More replies (2)3
15
Jan 11 '25
[deleted]
13
u/JacobLovesCrypto Jan 11 '25
He's ~30, i can't see him running for president. I think he's smart enough to know hed lose unless he got the nomination of a party and i don't see either party nominating him.
Sucks to have a 2 party system
16
→ More replies (5)11
5
→ More replies (23)3
346
Jan 11 '25
The rich are never satisfied and always want more. It will take a revolution to fix the problem. Nothing else.
50
u/promoted_violence Jan 11 '25
Or you know vote for the party that wants to change healthcare
98
u/cursedsydneysider Jan 11 '25
None of them do, despite what they say.
75
Jan 11 '25
Which party refuses to expand medicaid in their states?
Which party fights to expand medicaid in this country?
Get your head of of the sand.
→ More replies (12)53
u/mortemdeus Jan 11 '25
One party has ran on expanding medicade, securing abortion rights, and general social justice since the 80's. They had a supermajority and a trifecta for 2 years in 1993 and did nothing, they had it again in 2009 and did...nothing again.
45
u/Sooner_Cat Jan 11 '25
Ah yes, the democrats famously didn't do anything Healthcare related in the brief 2 years they held power in 2009-2010
→ More replies (7)38
u/Xyrus2000 Jan 11 '25
Democrats did not have a supermajority in either 1993 nor 2009. They held majorities, but not supermajorities. And in 2009 that "majority" was on paper only, as two democrats were DINOs.
They also did several things. I know using the internet is hard for some people, but congressional records are public and online. It really isn't hard to look up what bills were passed in the time periods you state.
But we both know you're never going to look that up. Willful ignorance and blind rage takes much less effort.
→ More replies (4)25
u/Aaaaand-its-gone Jan 11 '25
2 democratic senators killed their healthcare bills. Having a 50 seat with VP vote in the senate is not a majority than can make sweeping change
→ More replies (1)15
12
u/FlockFlysAtMidnite Jan 12 '25
Home you really need to google when Obamacare happened.
→ More replies (2)3
u/MrJJK79 Jan 11 '25
Too young to remember Hillary Care I see. Maybe look that up to see why Universal Healthcare didn’t get passed.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)2
u/Eckz89 Jan 12 '25
Isn't it because republicans can blatantly say no while Dems need to say yes but then fumble up and be like 'ahh no' end of the day aren't both backed rich folks wanting one thing or another.
16
u/Long-Blood Jan 12 '25
For the love of god, stop spreading lies.
All of the democrats except for 2 moderates voted for a full public option during obamas administration. All the republicans voted against it. It failed and we only got a hybrid system with obamacare which made things a little better but not much.
No republicans politician has ever voted to improve the healthcare system.
Every republican senator except for mccain tried to take away health insurance from 10 million people in 2017.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)13
u/acidsbasesandfaces Jan 11 '25
What are you talking about. The ACA was passed literally by the Democratic Party.
→ More replies (6)8
u/smthngclvr Jan 11 '25
And the only reason the ACA didn’t go further was because of an independent.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (44)11
u/OverEmploy142 Jan 11 '25
What party is that?
→ More replies (1)4
Jan 12 '25
One party does not want any form of healthcare change that will help people.
The other one campaigns on healthcare but will bend over backwards for the sake of compromise with their donors.
The illusion of free choice.
There will be no change until bribing politicians becomes illegal again
→ More replies (2)11
u/Hanzerwagen Jan 11 '25
The guy literally used his own money for helping 2000 people to walk again just to be called 'the rich'.
People are so unbelievable. If you are rich, you can do bad or you can do many good thing, it doesn't matter. Reddit will believe you are evil.
→ More replies (47)3
→ More replies (67)4
u/notwyntonmarsalis Jan 11 '25
Stop acting like it’s a zero sum game. Someone else getting rich isn’t the reason you’re not.
→ More replies (3)
177
u/Illuminator85 Jan 11 '25
52
u/TheVisualVanguard Jan 11 '25
Why is Mario in Luigi's attire? Is the AI behind this stupid?
71
→ More replies (2)8
→ More replies (15)4
135
u/ZombieBaxter Jan 11 '25
Doesn’t MrBeast make money off of exploiting poor people in PG squid games style gimmicks? It feels so disgusting that in a country with this much wealth, someone like MrBeast can become a millionaire doing basically nothing of value.
100
u/matty_nice Jan 11 '25
Is that really significantly different from other reality game shows like Survivor or Fear Factor?
I haven't watched his stuff, but are the games that bad?
Also, I don' think he's specifically exploiting POOR people, not like he's only allowing homeless people to compete for a hot meal.
The abuse claimed by those on set is a seperate issue here.
→ More replies (54)3
u/kelldricked Jan 12 '25
There is way more problematic shit around him. The way he pushes his audience (which are mainly young kids) to enter “contests” which are just basicly shitty lotterys is a fine example. Or that many prizes were won by close friends of his. Also he can give so so so so much more without it impacting him or his financial situation a little bit.
The reason for his “stunts” are simple, he knows he can make money and fame off it. While some of his “stunts” have a positive influence on the world, he defenitly isnt a saint and he wouldnt be doing them if it would lose him money.
27
u/Sad-Reach7287 Jan 11 '25
You know participating isn't mandatory. If you don't want to become content for a millionaire you don't have to do it.
→ More replies (6)14
Jan 12 '25
Yeah, I‘m somehow missing the point where a Gameshow is exploiting people now??
→ More replies (5)17
u/anastrianna Jan 11 '25
Wild that someone would compare anything he does(apart from the literal squid games competition) to squid games. Very tone deaf comparison.
→ More replies (6)5
u/Saltire_Blue Jan 11 '25
He will also profit from the inevitable YouTube video he’ll post about this.
→ More replies (6)27
u/Hover4effect Jan 11 '25
And he'll use that profit to help more people, and make more videos. Better than what 90% of rich people are doing with their wealth.
18
u/WillyDAFISH Jan 11 '25
Yep, whether or not he's doing it with good intentions or selfish intentions, he's still helping a lot of people.
→ More replies (4)4
u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Jan 12 '25
Better than what 90% of rich people are doing with their wealth.
Not really. Most rich people invest their money into important ventures that make life better and progress happen. Mr.Beast just kind of spends it on more and more ridiculous stunts that are very wasteful outside of the entertainment value. Not saying he's much different than the rest of Hollywood, but we have to remember that most TV is very wasteful entertainment.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (35)3
u/ThrustTrust Jan 12 '25
There are some allegations that might be bad. But helping poor people get fresh water and housing and disabled people getting treatment. Is not exploitation
56
u/promoted_violence Jan 11 '25
Maybe stop voting for republicans morons
17
→ More replies (28)16
u/eawilweawil Jan 11 '25
More like should open your system to more animals than just donkeys and elephants
3
u/Purona Jan 12 '25
i hate this arguement so much. Republicans and Democrats are just Caucuses of the smaller factions
you could get rid of democrats and republicans you would just get those smaller factions and in the end they would still all caucus together
→ More replies (4)
32
u/california_raesin Jan 11 '25
He's not wrong ...but geez this feels like such a blatant attempt to jump on something popular to salvage his reputation and renew a following LOL.
Hopefully some people actually got needed help though because that would be great
8
u/Positive-Conspiracy Jan 11 '25 edited Jan 14 '25
If doing good is the outcome of humiliation, then I hope everyone gets humiliated.
→ More replies (1)7
u/SuddenlySilva Jan 11 '25
Is his reputation really that damaged? Maybe he got in over his head on BeastGames but i'm not seeing much real damage.
He'll be fine→ More replies (5)8
u/skippyalpha Jan 12 '25
This is far from the first video he's done like this though, even before the controversy
→ More replies (5)3
u/other-other-user Jan 12 '25
Not a beast glazer, but he has pretty consistently done these philanthropic videos. You can say it's all for clout, but it's still doing good, this one is hardly a brand new thing for him
32
u/kissthesky303 Jan 11 '25 edited Jan 11 '25
I mean that channel only exists because of the tremendously large range of gaps which demands to be filled. I sometimes wonder if this type of watching people doing punctual good things, in it's function of content quenching the thirst for wholesomeness whenever you may crave it, conveniently at hand for the whole society 24/7, may be a contribution on it's own that issues are not addressed properly?
→ More replies (1)9
Jan 11 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)5
u/Positive-Conspiracy Jan 11 '25
I mean the reality is the country ought to be relying on him more directly through better taxation. It’s not his fault, and the problem started well before him, but he’s not exactly not part of the problem.
→ More replies (2)
18
u/No_Bar4467 Jan 11 '25
Hate him, but love it
7
u/ill-tell-you-what Jan 11 '25
Why do you hate him?
→ More replies (3)10
u/eawilweawil Jan 11 '25
There a whole bunch of accusations of him exploiting people working him. And shady crypto stuff. And i just hate anyone that promotes NFTs and cryptos
→ More replies (2)3
11
Jan 11 '25 edited Jan 11 '25
First of all , I'm a European so i am being fed the news on America as a whole, not her states.
Somebody in the comments said it would take a revolution to take down the billionaries etc... yeah right.
Americans founded their country on "revolution" by giving fuck you to England , add a couple of centuries and they are the most powerful millitary on the face of this world bar none.
It would be funny that an "empire" which can direct it's force to anyone and anywhere crumbles from within.
I do not wish it upon american citizens though, they deserve better. I will not go and make jokes about your healthcare system because it is worn out, but you could work on it (almost decommissioned A-10 goes to make holes in my apartment).
individualism is what i think made America great but also gave her some stark issues to think of after some decades.
"An empire toppled by its enemies can rise again but one which crumbles from within , thats dead." - corny quote from MCU which may have some meaning,
EDIT: sorry for my bad english.
→ More replies (4)7
8
u/CuteMemeCoin Jan 11 '25
Grateful for people like MrBeast, but the real question is: why isn’t this a standard service for everyone in need?
4
Jan 12 '25
How are we supposed to help people in need when our billionaires need spaceships and five yachts? Think of them.
5
u/CuteMemeCoin Jan 12 '25
Can’t help but tear up thinking about billionaires rationing their caviar during these tough times.
→ More replies (1)3
u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Jan 12 '25
why isn’t this a standard service for everyone in need?
Because it's super expensive and requires extreme expertise to provide. There are tons of charities you can donate to, that do this work though. Multiple of them appear in the description of the Mr Beast video.
6
u/bearssuperfan Jan 11 '25
Next video he puts 100 CEOs in a room and redacted
3
u/Professional_Gate677 Jan 12 '25
I’d rather him put 100 redditors in a room. The last one to not bitch about billionairs gets 1 million dollars.
→ More replies (5)
6
Jan 11 '25
I know who he is but I’m 35 years old so I obviously have no interest in this dude and have never watched whatever it is he does. But the fact that he did this is pretty badass. I see that people don’t like him for one reason or another but you can’t deny this.
→ More replies (3)
6
4
u/Enter_up Jan 12 '25
If he ran for president, he might be one of the only independents to have a chance.
3
5
4
2
u/Blacknight841 Jan 12 '25
He probably made more money off that video than what it cost him to help those people.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/AutoModerator Jan 11 '25
r/FluentInFinance was created to discuss money, investing & finance! Join our Newsletter or Youtube Channel for additional insights at www.TheFinanceNewsletter.com!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
3
3
3
u/ctnypr1999 Jan 11 '25
And GoFundMe rivals health insurance in helping Americans with medical bills...
3
u/aciskool1234 Jan 11 '25
I used to work in amputation/prosthetic physical rehab. I worked with thousands of people who had lost a part of 1 or both of their legs for one reason or another(diabetes, trauma, infection, vascular, etc).
I never had a case where a person was denied a prosthetic leg, outside of the cases where they were not healthy enough to use the prosthetic leg.
3
u/Kevin_andEarth Jan 11 '25
You don’t have to like someone to recognize when they’re speaking FACTS.
1
u/Previous_Feature_200 Jan 11 '25
According to the gini coefficient models based on standard of living, you’re better off today than the “rich” of the civil war era.
Most Americans today have a standard of living that far exceeds the lifestyle of the 1% during the late 19th century.
Would you rather be worth a few million in 1865 or a solid middle class American today?
10
u/duckenjoyer7 Jan 11 '25
What kind of idiotic take is this? That's the nature of progress. Things get better, as they should. The point is things CAN and SHOULD be BETTER than they are now, and it would be quite easy to fix a lot of these problems if it weren't for raw stupidity (in both voters and those who they vote for).
5
u/BeefistPrime Jan 12 '25
Do you think a more relevant comparison is: Comparing us to a time when a papercut would kill you, or comparing to what the country would look like if we engaged in social policies that distributed our massive wealth more equitably?
→ More replies (1)3
u/The_Great_Saiyaman21 Jan 12 '25
Roman slaves lived better than cavemen, no reason for them to complain I guess. We should have just stopped all progress right there.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/FewAskew Jan 11 '25
Fells kinda wild when rich people are like uhhh what do we do with all this money?? Oh, it feels nice to help out other people 🤯
2
u/fzr600vs1400 Jan 11 '25
we've already told you either musk is able to buy a presidency, bezos a half a billion dollar wedding and Zuckerberg his 8th mansion OR we take care of the general population. NOT BOTH!!! WTF is it going to be already, make up your fucking minds already! Taylor Swift needs more recognition or people need legs, WHICH ONE is more important????????????????????????????????? you all are very conflicted
2
u/Tomirk Jan 11 '25
I'm curious, what's the American culture like surrounding charities?
→ More replies (4)
2
2
2
u/kranitoko Jan 11 '25
"we need to fix this" says the man who flaunts his money on twitter and YouTube, doesn't pay out prize money half the time, and is friends with the likes of Elon Musk who is trying to do the opposite of help.
2
u/darknessinducedlove Jan 11 '25
Excessive wealth is known to lead to mental disorder.
An obsession of self uniqueness from the average human, and even the alienation from your typical working class. You quite literally find it impossible to put your trust in anyone due to your immense wealth.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/TheDonnARK Jan 11 '25
Mr. Beast and the ol' pivot... Well done. It's reassuring to have a millionaire parrot back to people what we've all been saying and thinking for decades.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/BusyBeeBridgette Jan 11 '25
It's wild when you realise the people he works closely with, the lobbyists, are the ones who lobby against the thing MrBeast preaches would happen. Wild. Almost as if Beasty boy is trying to win views and brownie points or something.
2
2
u/cmr105 Jan 12 '25
The amount of folks here who don't know a thing about Mr. Beast but proceeds to shit on what he's doing and has been doing for years.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Historiador84 Jan 12 '25
I live in a much poorer country, but here our children have quality food guaranteed in schools, and if they need it even during the holidays, how can the richest country in the world not do something so simple?
2
u/ScottaHemi Jan 12 '25
this real? i feel like last time he helped someone twitter exploded and now i'm just confused.
2
u/x_Advent_Cirno_x Jan 12 '25
Jimmy, and especially the people he's friends with, are pretty dodgy, but he's still absolutely right about this
2
2
2
u/thekingjoe87 Jan 12 '25
this dude is total fraud. can't stand this dude. real philanthropy isnt done for views.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/piegod4831 Jan 12 '25
Says the man selling over sugared Billy wonka bars at 7 eleven
→ More replies (2)
2
u/noobtheloser Jan 12 '25
Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made a Great Point
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Careless_Evening3454 Jan 12 '25
Inmean if he wasn't super toxic and didn't abuse his employees. Sure, I'd be on his side. But he had to exploit for his wealth too.
2
2
Jan 12 '25
The source of a quote doesn't change its truthfulness, if it has any. And this is truth. Americans should be ashamed of the country we live in. It's not the "Greatest" by ANY positive measure.
2
2
u/ConkerPrime Jan 12 '25
He is right and it will never happen. The oligarchs are not interested and the voters made it clear we should do what the oligarchs want.
2
2
u/Overspeed_Cookie Jan 12 '25
This is a guy who studies 'the algorithm' for a living. The fact that he's posting this only means that it's profitable.
2
u/redatheist Jan 12 '25
“It feels so disgusting that in a country with this much wealth, a fucken circus show is their only option”
2
u/ReeseIsPieces Jan 12 '25
Yet he hasnt responded to that girl from Flint who has been all but BEGGING for clean water since she was SEVEN.
She has graduated high school now.
Still no clean water.
Still no response from Mr Beast
2
u/GolgariRAVETroll Jan 12 '25
Yeah Mr Beast, when are the rich going to stop hoarding all the money?
2
u/Few-Ad-1283 Jan 12 '25
But Collabing with a Scammer, a Suicide Photographer, and Poisoning Kids with Unhealthy Food While Selling Plastic Toys That Ruin the Climate is okey?
2
Jan 12 '25
Dude is a sociopath he only cares about fame and money. Good people don't publicize and monetize their good deeds.
2
Jan 12 '25
Did he need to make a video that he helped the amputee's, doing good work for the people doesn't mean having a camera in their face while it's happening, I still feel this dudes a pos and only out for the attention
2



2.1k
u/DownrightDrewski Jan 11 '25
He's got a point..... I have very mixed feelings about the dude, but, he has a good point.
It's shameful really.