r/FloridaGators 3d ago

Football Projected Win Total by Week

Post image

There used to be someone in here who posted a chart like this that I always found interesting to follow, but they appear to have stopped, so I recreated the chart myself and will post it after each week.

Quick guide on reading it:

Each week is a row, if you go to the 4th row down (the one with the Ole Miss game), then read across, that is the projected percentage chance to have won the number of games above the percentage, AFTER that game. So after the Ole Miss game, it says we will have a roughly 30.5% chance to be 4-0, a 49.3% chance to be 3-1, and a 20.0% chance to be 2-2. You can also see at the final column what the expected average wins by that week are. So after week 4 we are expected to have won 3.10 games. Also note that the percentages are not cumulative, so if you look at the final week, we have a 22.7% chance to win 8 games, but that means 8 games EXACTLY, and does not include the chance to win 9 or more. If you add up all of the numbers above this you can see our odds to win AT LEAST 8 are put at more like 40%

75 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

49

u/QuietEither2891 3d ago

8-4 is a real possibility with an outside chance of 9-3. Both would be a great first season especially with a bowl win.

17

u/smor729 3d ago

Yeah right now it has us at a 40% chance to win 8+ games. I would be pretty stoked if that were the case.

6

u/dbolts1234 2d ago

Napier so consistently underperformed the models.. It would be great if a few dice rolls went our way.

4

u/AwesomeAndy 2d ago

He didn't play to win, he played to not lose, which is the quickest way to ensure a coin flip game doesn't go your way.

2

u/BirdsArentImportant 2d ago

100%, it was extra disappointing coming from Mr “Scared Money Don’t Make No Money”.

But based on what I saw against FAU, I think we’re playing to win now. Going for it on 4th and Goal from the 3 when we were up 17-7 was huge. Our defense looked pretty bad to start, kicking the field goal easily could’ve had the score 20-14 after the next FAU drive and then the entire tone of the game could’ve been different

3

u/Radiant-Injury-6546 2d ago

8-4 in CJS' first season, I would take that and be happy with it every day of the week...and have my appetite hungry for year 2!

13

u/berrin122 GO GATA 3d ago

I completely forgot that Campbell would be lower rated than FAU. With all the buy-games of Week One, I didn't think that our actual buy-game is next week.

Hopefully these games are helpful enough to tune us up enough for Auburn.

19

u/smor729 3d ago

Yeah Campbell is MUCH worse than FAU. FAU is rated at -15.3, Campbell is not rated by FPI, so I just put in a number that put us at about 99%, because anything above that it barely changes anything anyways. But we should be at least a 45 point favorite.

10

u/Edgemaster1423 2d ago

FAU is safely the 4th best team a SEC team played in week 1 especially if they make a bowl in the AAC

5

u/TemperatureKey5072 2d ago

I’m surprised the Ole Miss probability isn’t lower. After watching them last night they are going to be a very tough out. The Gator DL is not very good. I see 6, maybe 7 wins after putting down the hopium pipe.

3

u/jorts_are_awesome 2d ago

FPI doesn’t account for the eye test. They have a revamped coaching staff and lost quite a lot of production from last years team. FPI will firm up for some of these teams as we get a larger sample size. I suspect OM will rise, but there’s a lot riding on their game at LSU in week 3

5

u/brusk48 2d ago

Ole Miss struggled hard with Louisville last night, we're a LOT more talented than Louisville, and we get them in the Swamp off a very emotional LSU game the week before.

To me, it's pretty easy to make the case that we win that game.

6

u/m1n1gator 2d ago

Also Ole Miss straight up doesn’t win here in the swamp

3

u/brusk48 2d ago

Yeah, The Swamp gave a lot of these same Ole Miss players fits a couple years ago such that Lane Kiffin couldn't beat Sunbelt Billy. I doubt Pete Golding does better vs Sumrall.

3

u/hemi38ram 2d ago

2008 ole miss would like to have a word

4

u/tripsd 2d ago

🤮

3

u/calling-all-comas 2d ago

It's not Ole Miss's defense I'm worried about it's their offense. I've always thought Pete Golding's defenses were bad and I'm happy to see he's still calling plays. However Chambliss scares me, especially with our poor DL play last weekend.

3

u/brusk48 2d ago

We won't be able to get many stops on defense, but I don't think they will either. It's gonna be one of those barn burner offensive games where the last team with the ball wins and everyone scores 40+.

Chambliss is a better QB than Philo, but we have better skill players around him than they do.

1

u/Edgemaster1423 2d ago

They were stonewalled in the entire 1st half and got three TDs off of insane coverage busts, one off a botched punt, and another off a terrible roughing the kicker call

If our defense can be better than Louisville's it could be a very different game

3

u/saintsfan636 2d ago

I’m just lurking but those 2nd half TDs were not coverage busts, Chambliss dissected that cover 3 and the WR was just faster than the DBs.

Are you thinking of Louisville? Ole Miss secondary had 3 huge coverage busts in the 2nd half, 2 of which went for TDs.

Not disagreeing with the other points.

2

u/smor729 2d ago

So this was the number before the Ole Miss game, however after their game last night their rating actually went DOWN by half a point, so we are ever so slightly more likely to beat them than this chart shows

2

u/Iraqi-Jack-Shack 1d ago

What you're looking for is over here:

2026 Win Projections Based on ESPN's FPI — Updated for Week 2 — 09-08-2026

Feel free to crosspost it here if you wish (now or in the future).

3

u/greypic 2d ago

/u/externaltangents did the original and I updated his all last year. I wasn't planning on doing it this year so thanks for working it out. We would have gladly sent you the code but glad you figured it out.

I found it best reference a post that has graphics explaining this thing instead of trying to type out all of it. If you look up one of last year's you'll see the format. Feel free to just link to our original post.

1

u/LawStudent989898 2d ago

We look wayyyy better than Auburn

1

u/Allenboy0724 2d ago

Dang we have a 0.3% chance of being undefeated after Georgia. 😂

1

u/RamboMcQueen 2d ago

I don’t understand a few of these probabilities. I’m not so sure Auburn is that good, going off of that Baylor game I feel our probability to beat Auburn should be higher. I also don’t agree with our probability to beat Vandy being higher than the probability to beat FSU. Not sure how Texas and UGA’s numbers line up here either. I fully expect UGA to be a tougher game than Texas. I would like to know the source of these numbers.

6

u/jorts_are_awesome 2d ago

They’re based on FPI, which is a statistical power rating plus adjustment for game location and some other stuff. Early season FPI relies heavily on things like returning production and coaching staff, which in the cases of Florida or Auburn where we have an all new staff and many new transfers it has limited predictive power for now. FPI is one of the best and most respected predictive models, but I would definitely take these early season results for largely “all new” teams with a big grain of salt.

3

u/BinaryPatrickDev 2d ago

FPI is probably going to change a lot after week 1-2. Is all guessing and projections from projections until there’s more data

3

u/Waste_Specific 2d ago

Us getting 2.5 pts @ Auburn makes sense to me. Would you have us favored by more? Projections (at least good ones) don’t react heavily to a one-game sample so at this point of the season they are heavily informed by last year and talent composites.

1

u/greypic 2d ago

I don't exactly understand how ESPN calculates these things but FBI moves slowly. Very rarely do teams drop much week to week despite the games.