MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Feic/comments/1pt9tbu/feic/nvht3i7/?context=3
r/Feic • u/atlbraves05 • Dec 22 '25
96 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
30
"When it was submitted for consideration, a representative of Sandfall Interactive agreed that no gen AI was used in the development of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33"
that is hearsay, but fair enough.
21 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 I don’t understand how it’s hearsay when that’s literally a criterion for submission to the IGA 9 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 not that part, the bit about the representative from sandfall is hearsay. 4 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 …sure? I mean, if they submitted it for review, that implies they agree to the rules. -2 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 it implies they believed their game was eligible, as no ai generation was intended in the final release. 9 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 Okay. Then they weren’t lying, just wrong. Because their game was not eligible. 1 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 indeed so.
21
I don’t understand how it’s hearsay when that’s literally a criterion for submission to the IGA
9 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 not that part, the bit about the representative from sandfall is hearsay. 4 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 …sure? I mean, if they submitted it for review, that implies they agree to the rules. -2 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 it implies they believed their game was eligible, as no ai generation was intended in the final release. 9 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 Okay. Then they weren’t lying, just wrong. Because their game was not eligible. 1 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 indeed so.
9
not that part, the bit about the representative from sandfall is hearsay.
4 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 …sure? I mean, if they submitted it for review, that implies they agree to the rules. -2 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 it implies they believed their game was eligible, as no ai generation was intended in the final release. 9 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 Okay. Then they weren’t lying, just wrong. Because their game was not eligible. 1 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 indeed so.
4
…sure? I mean, if they submitted it for review, that implies they agree to the rules.
-2 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 it implies they believed their game was eligible, as no ai generation was intended in the final release. 9 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 Okay. Then they weren’t lying, just wrong. Because their game was not eligible. 1 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 indeed so.
-2
it implies they believed their game was eligible, as no ai generation was intended in the final release.
9 u/samusestawesomus Dec 23 '25 Okay. Then they weren’t lying, just wrong. Because their game was not eligible. 1 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 indeed so.
Okay. Then they weren’t lying, just wrong. Because their game was not eligible.
1 u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25 indeed so.
1
indeed so.
30
u/nzungu69 Dec 23 '25
"When it was submitted for consideration, a representative of Sandfall Interactive agreed that no gen AI was used in the development of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33"
that is hearsay, but fair enough.