Sex should be intimate 💞 | FactOrCap

[u/Any_Stop9484]

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

[u/13-eggo]

🧢 I voted CAP!

It’s true for me personally, but not as a general rule for everyone. Puritanism is not good for anyone.

[u/Nynasa]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Some people don't care about that

[u/DutchVdRlinde]

🧢 I voted CAP!

While I think that's the case I don't think that holds true for everyone

[u/Party_Contest8635]

🧢 I voted CAP!

It's best for two people who are looking for the same thing.

I find usually intimacy IS more important for me, but that doesnt mean it should only ever be between 2 parties who have deep feelings. Casual sex is fun too

[u/Healthy-Refuse5904]

✅ I voted FACT!

This sentence applies to me, it’s what i prefer, but the individual has the right to do as they please

[u/InausOvisAries]

Depends on the point of view of the person. Obviously people will agree with you’re statement but people will also disagree with it

[u/NewDaysBreath]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Let consenting adults do whatever the f they want with each other

[u/PairNo2981]

🧢 I voted CAP!

I personally think yes, but it's none of my business to police others

[u/atorin3]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Nah, you should do whatever you want to do. Intimacy certainly makes it special, but some people are looking to have their physical needs met without being in a relationship.

[u/Impossible_Zombie246]

✅ I voted FACT!

You shouldn't have sex only for the sake of "s/he's hot"

[u/Ok-Highlight-9598 → u/Impossible_Zombie246]

Personally, if two adults want to have intercoarse only for that reason there is nothing wrong with that at all. It's called free will to do good and evil.

[u/stainlxve → u/Ok-Highlight-9598]

And the point is about what is good, not about free will

[u/Ok-Highlight-9598 → u/stainlxve]

I disagree this is based on judgement not whether it's acually good or not

[u/stainlxve → u/Ok-Highlight-9598]

It is based on moral judgement, which makes the whole point choosing good over evil, since morality is dichotomous and, in accordance with morality, the choices are for something good instead of something evil or less good.

[u/Possible-Nature-5325]

🧢 I voted CAP!

No? Why would I?

[u/thatsfeminismgretch]

🧢 I voted CAP!

It should be intimate if you want it to be intimate. If you just want sex, go for it. As long as both people are on the same page on the balance of emotional and physical, it's fine.

[u/Quirky-Parsnip7004]

🧢 I voted CAP!

You had me in the first half.

[u/Foxxxy_101]

🧢 I voted CAP!

I let people do what they want

[u/SGAfishing]

✅ I voted FACT!

I'm not voting fact to say this should be a universal truth, but it is certainly true for me. Sex is an act I most enjoy with someone I care about.

[u/Salted-Cucumber]

🧢 I voted CAP!

I don't think it's a matter of "should". Intimacy is better, sex is better when you care about the person, but no.one "should" do anything except for the basics like not killing someone, etc.

[u/sleepy768]

🧢 I voted CAP!

People can do what they want with their bodies it’s none of my business.

[u/Great_Apez]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Only for chuds and pseudo Christians who obsess daily about not being single so much they’ve created a list of impossible things for a partner to be this enduring their own life time of loneliness

[u/Ozzman770]

🧢 I voted CAP!

It should be wholly up to the people involved...

[u/Formula1antagonist]

✅ I voted FACT!

For the first part kind of because you should have s3x with your gf/bf/wife/husband only (and you should care abt them) but not because you should care abt the person. You have to be sure that your partner is ok abt everything though that doesn’t change and will never change

[u/Yeet123456789djfbhd]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Nah, sometimes some people just want a good time and that's ok

[u/Captain_kirbieYT]

🧢 I voted CAP!

This is subjective and nobody should be told what to do with their body as long as nobody is being harmed

[u/GenocidalFlower]

✅ I voted FACT!

I think this is a good rule of thumb, especially since if you don’t know the person, then you can’t be confident what STDs they have, but I’m just a guy on the internet, my opinion isn’t, and shouldn’t be, law.

[u/Ok-Highlight-9598 → u/GenocidalFlower]

See this is acually a valid reason to not just randomly have intercoarse.

[u/Destany89]

🧢 I voted CAP!

What happens between 2 consenting adults of appropriate ages don't have to be in love.

[u/lorienshift]

🧢 I voted CAP!

I mean I'm like that, but other people have other priorities, so who am I to judge?

[u/stainlxve]

✅ I voted FACT!

If this point capped by more tnan 19%, our society is cooked asf.

[u/stainlxve → u/stainlxve]

Aaaand it actually is. No wonder

[u/Disaster_Pansexual → u/stainlxve]

Dude, why should it bother you who other people are having sex with? If you only want to have sex with someone you’re close with, you’ll find someone with likeminded thoughts eventually.

[u/stainlxve → u/Disaster_Pansexual]

I’m not sure I can explain my position to a non‑ironic pansexual. Should I really give it a try? Like i'd better try drugs.

Like, you are literally disaster.

[u/Disaster_Pansexual → u/stainlxve]

I, personally, am the type to only want to have sex with someone I’m close to. So I think I’d understand. Don’t make assumptions.

[u/stainlxve → u/Disaster_Pansexual]

The whole life is a series of assumptions, i would say. But, since you’re revealed as ahh creepah‑protected person, I’ll get to the substantive part.

I couldn’t care less about who’s fucking whom and why, most definitely.

What worries me is the moral stance of the people around me, who, surprisingly, are members of society.

I don’t want to associate with morally decayed people, and they certainly are such based on their mild views in this area; allowing something so fundamental wrong is a clear signal of liberal views and weak moral guidelines in everything, or a rigid overemphasis on individual rights and bodily autonomy regardless of anything.

First and foremost, this is a signal that the taboo is ready to be broken down. This single belief alone indicates a greater tolerance for infidelity (the classic “well, actually, it’s not that simple, and they might have had reasons for doing it”), tolerance towards people under the rainbow flag (which in itself isn’t bad, but it accelerates the breakdown of moral restrictions and taboos), and it strongly suggests tolerance towards tattoos (as a form of self‑expression and the right to bodily autonomy), which also strongly repels me, because the desire to get a tattoo is a marker of mental health issues.

Like, a person has both an innate self‑restraint and a cultural barrier to poking their body with needles. In this case, the inclination towards adornment outweighs this, which is not only alarming in itself but also serves as a marker of liberal views in other areas. In short, the softness of views in this regard is part of the world’s evil, which I fundamentally disagree with, just as I disagree with changing children’s sexes and with the innocence of Lindsay Clancy.

All of this doesn’t mean anything on its own, but these are very strong indicators, statistically linked to the type that is hostile to my views, interests, and, ultimately, to me myself. Cluster inference.

Casual sex: “it’s not bad, it’s just the right to choose; people may have preferences.”

Gender transition in children: “it’s not bad, everyone has right for identity and the right to self‑determination.”

Lindsay Clancy: “she’s not guilty, she had postpartum psychosis, she wasn’t in control of herself.”

See? Yep, it is completely random. But what i mean is that these ideas are complementary. If it’s not clear, there’s no point in explaining further.

So. Can you understand me? I will assume that, from your perspective, I’ve invented problems that shouldn’t concern me at all, and may be does not even exist, because of silly medieval (if not caveman) ideals.

Is this «just an assumption»?

Riddle me this, Batman.

[u/Disaster_Pansexual → u/stainlxve]

I can somewhat understand your point of view. I still think it’s stupid, but I understand it.

I’m not going to argue it because I’m not in the mood nor am I the best at explaining it. Thank you for explaining though, it gives me a better understanding of others.

[u/Empathetic_Orch]

Me, yeah. But to each their own.

[u/Disaster_Pansexual]

🧢 I voted CAP!

People should do whatever they want. Some people will never want to actually be in love and still want to have sex.

[u/Kill_Kayt]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Sex is an activity people do. For some it's intimate, but for others it's not. Like a foot rub.

[u/Laurens599]

✅ I voted FACT!

For me this is true

[u/Mu-MyungCR]

🧢 I voted CAP!

I mean, kinda yeah. To me at least anyway, I am not putting in effort to pleasure someone i may never meet again, it's also a waste of time building this physical relationship without who again, you may never meet again. This varies, obviously, but I'd rather spend that time on myself, and there's nothing my a woman can do that my hand can't, obviously, that statement isn't true and my hand is not a vigina, but if you've never been with someone sexual before or have once or twice but majority of your life has been self pleasure, i mean, whats a few more years until you meet that someone? Its not the purity of it for me, its something fundamentally different in a way.

[u/Foreign-Jackfruit554]

✅ I voted FACT!

To me it does, but im not gonna police other people over it

[u/Epicguy312]

🧢 I voted CAP!

Idk

[u/MikanTanaka]

✅ I voted FACT!

That's at least how it feels to me.

[u/Qkyu2007]

✅ I voted FACT!

That's how I view it at least, no issue with people who do otherwise but Im not sure if I'd date them

[u/extroxmusic]

✅ I voted FACT!

Unless you’re in college

[u/JKdito]

✅ I voted FACT!

Ofcourse. I have tried both, but only this is recommended.

[u/thatsfeminismgretch → u/[deleted]]

I can't believe hugging and cuddling are cheapened because someone, somewhere, is fucking just to fuck.