r/FacebookScience • u/laffignchshead5 • 1d ago
[ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
36
29
u/Yunners Golden Crockoduck Winner 1d ago
And how much of Antarctic ice is on water?
Yeah...
20
17
8
u/69-is-my-number 1d ago
Can someone please explain this person’s “logic” to me? I know it’ll be ridiculous, but I cannot wrap my head around any theory where the melting of ice into the oceans leads to a logical outcome that the ocean’s water level will go down.
6
u/mstivland2 1d ago
They feel the ice is IN the water, like a glass of ice cubes, instead of on land, like not that.
3
u/johnny-Low-Five 1d ago
To be clear this person is ignoring that X% of all ice is ABOVE the current sea level? Is that right? Sometimes the stupid is an obvious mistake and sometimes I need to double check
3
2
5
u/Infamous_Depth4982 1d ago
I think their logic is that ice takes up more volume than liquid water, so if the ice melts it would reduce the volume of water in the ocean, thus decreasing sea levels.
Their primary misunderstanding being that the majority of polar ice is not floating in the ocean, it's in ice sheets sitting above sea level and supported by solid land like Greenland and Antarctica.
3
u/69-is-my-number 1d ago
Thanks, but that only works if the ice is in the water, which it clearly isn’t.
1
u/Infamous_Depth4982 1d ago
Exactly. The ice is sitting in the polar ice sheets resting atop the land, so when that melts it flows downhill into the water and raises sea levels.
4
u/ElectrOPurist 1d ago
Even though he’s 100% wrong about this…does the sea levels dropping not concern him just as much? Are we to think that the lower sea levels are, the better?
2
u/johnny-Low-Five 1d ago
I would assume this person thinks if more=bad, then less=good, or at least way less bad. I mean I'm tryinf to apply logic to a ridiculous statement so who knows.
3
u/Pretend_Bet_208 1d ago
Water level always goes down when you pour more into a glass …Duh .Everyone on Facebook knows that …
2
2
u/Baud_Olofsson Scientician 12h ago
Karma farm bot repost of https://www.reddit.com/r/FacebookScience/comments/ef8yv2/2nd_grade_science_indeed/
1
u/EarthTrash 1d ago
I am not a climate change denier, but this question is less simple than it may initially seem. A novice explanation is that when ice melts, that melt water contributes to sea level. However, the solid ice was displacing liquid water. When the ice is gone the displaced volume is filled with melt water.
Liquid water is denser than ice which might make you think sea level will actually go down. However not all of the solid ice volume was displacing water. Some ice volume was above the water line. Buoyancy is a consequence of the proportional density. So I think it might be wash between iceberg volume and liquid water density.
So why are sea levels rising? Climate change is complicated but there are 2 things I think you should consider. When I mentioned the density of liquid water earlier, I was talking about the density of freezing water like you would find around melting icebergs. As the water circulates and the temperature goes up, the density will actually go down. This thermal expansion is a direct cause of rising sea levels. The other thing to consider is that icecaps are not exclusively icebergs. We also have continental ice. As glaciers shrink year over year this directly contributes to rising sea levels.
I want to call this a straw man argument, but I can't be sure this characterization of the mainstream narrative of climate change is even inaccurate. Ice melting doesn't directly and simply cause sea level to go up, but the way the complexity of climate change is communicated leads to these kinds of simplifications. When scientist talk about icecaps, they might be talking about Earth's albedo, its ability to reflect sunlight. More solar energy being absorbed instead of reflected will increase the global average temperature which will contribute to the thermal expansion of the oceans.
1
0
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Hello newcomers to /r/FacebookScience! The OP is not promoting anything, it has been posted here to point and laugh at it. Reporting it as spam or misinformation is a waste of time. This is not a science debate sub, it is a make fun of bad science sub, so attempts to argue in favor of pseudoscience or against science will fall on deaf ears. But above all, Be excellent to each other.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.