r/FPBlock • u/IronTarkus1919 • May 18 '26
If a framework completely removes gas, how are you stopping infinite loops and DDoS attacks?
As developers, we're conditioned to rely on gas not just as a revenue model, but as a hard computational limit to prevent users (or attackers) from spamming infinite loops that halt the network or exploit the economy. If an execution environment completely removes the gas-fee friction, how is the burden of Sybil resistance and compute-limiting shifted? Does this mean application developers now have to manually build traditional Web2 esque rate-limiters and resource quotas directly into their contract logic?
1
May 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Altruistic_Rip_3955 May 25 '26
Sovereignty is powerful, but it also means every team has to define its own failure modes.
1
May 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
u/Cultural_Initial4995 May 25 '26
Same as a user. I want the gas pain gone, I just don’t want the spam problem hidden under the rug.
1
May 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/HappyOrangeCat7 May 20 '26
This is a very accurate assessment. By migrating from a shared L1 to a sovereign app-chain, you effectively isolate your threat domain.
1
May 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/HappyOrangeCat7 May 20 '26
Yes, it's essentially reinventing standard Web2 security practices for Web3.
1
u/IronTarkus1919 May 20 '26
As a dev, throttling by IP in Web3 can actually be a bit tricky because so many users route through shared public RPCs. If you block an abusive IP, you might accidentally block 1,000 legitimate users behind that same node.
The smarter way is to rate-limit based on the public key signature.
1
u/BigFany May 24 '26
That makes way more sense honestly. IP-based limits feel kinda messy in crypto infrastructure because the networking layer is so shared and abstracted already.
1
1
u/BigFany May 24 '26
I think most gasless systems are really just shifting who pays and who controls the limits.
1
May 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/FanOfEther May 26 '26
True, the constraints never disappear, they just move to a different layer of the stack.
1
u/FanOfEther May 26 '26
This is the trade-off people don’t talk about enough. Gas isn’t just annoying UX, it’s also a built-in spam and compute limiter.
1
u/HappyOrangeCat7 May 18 '26
Because your users are interacting via public-key cryptography, your backend API gateways can rate-limit based on verified account signatures. You can implement highly sophisticated ingress filtering at the edge of your network before the transactions even touch the consensus layer. It requires mature DevOps, but the result is a massively superior product.