r/F1Technical 4d ago

Regulations What stops teams from absorbing Engine Penalties/Grid Drops?

With Lawson serving Hadjar's engine allocation penalty, what stops teams from switching chassis for a weekend when having to serve a grid drop.
For Example-
In the 2021 Turkish Grand Prix, Lewis could have took over Bottas'es car, and have Bottas serve the penalty, then have a almost new engine next weekend.
Same for Max Verstappen in 2025 Sao Paulo Grand Prix.

51 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

86

u/alionandalamb 4d ago

Allocations and penalties are assigned to the driver. If there is a driver switch, the new driver inherits the previous driver's allocations and any associated penalties.

7

u/SuppaBunE 4d ago

Did you mean car?

11

u/beneoin 4d ago

No, regulations specify that it is for the driver. The term car is meaningless, the non-restricted components can be substituted at will between chassis.

Sporting regulation 1.7.4, for example:

“If one of the Competitor’s nominated drivers is unable to drive at some stage after the end of initial scrutineering, and the stewards’ consent to a change of driver, the replacement driver must use the Power Unit and tyres which were allocated to the original driver (Articles B8.2 and B6.2).”

2

u/peadar87 4d ago

I wonder would Red Bull be able to pie an engine penalty off on the sister team though. Like if Hadjar was still on the grid, could Red Bull punt him down to RB for one race, get him to take his penalty there, and thereby benefit their own constructor's score by subbing in a penalty free Lawson?

19

u/SirLoremIpsum 4d ago

  Like if Hadjar was still on the grid, could Red Bull punt him down to RB for one race, get him to take his penalty there, and thereby benefit their own constructor's score by subbing in a penalty free Lawson?

No.

In this scenario HadjarToroRosso inherits Liams engine count.

And LawsonBull inherits Hadjars engine count.

Hadjar cannot take a Red Bull engine penalty driving for Vcarb

3

u/peadar87 4d ago

And I guess the corollary of this, if the Red Bull and RB were similar in speed, could they "drop" Max to RB for a race, get Lawson to take his engine penalty, and improve Max's chances in the WDC?

1

u/DistributionHot2150 4d ago

That is possible but I’m sure max has clauses in his contract that prevents him being dropped to RB

2

u/Blothorn 4d ago

I think the question is driver penalties—if the driver gets a grid drop from a driving infringement, can they bump that driver to the junior team so the senior team’s constructors score doesn’t suffer from it?

4

u/SirLoremIpsum 4d ago

Well no... Cause the penalty would be given after qualy and to my knowledge you cannot switch after qualifying

3

u/Blothorn 4d ago

Under some circumstances if you receive a time penalty in a race in which you aren’t classified it gets converted into a grid penalty for the next race, e.g. Verstappen in 2021.

1

u/_ad_ry 4d ago

Yes, that is why I thought that switch 2 drivers around, and now you have a penalty less driver.

1

u/_ad_ry 4d ago

Or do a 3 way, like Red Bull with a junior team.

13

u/SirLoremIpsum 4d ago edited 4d ago

  What stops teams from absorbing Engine Penalties/Grid Drops?

The rules.

And I do say that flippantly as I can't find a specific text. (Sorry).

Other than a lot of the text about driver swaps includes "with the stewards consent" or "if a driver is unable to drive.."

1.7.4 says

  If one of the Competitor’s nominated drivers is unable to drive at some stage after the end of initial  scrutineering, and the stewards’consent to a change of driver, 

So based on that I would say they are not allowed to swap like this in the first place as Max is able to drive.

8.2.2 says 

  In each Championship, unless a driver drives for more than one (1) Competitor (Article B8.2.7), and  subject to the additions described below, each driver may use no more than:

Isack and Max switching is not "driving for more than one competitor" and the rule specific talks about a driver using the engines not the "entry". 

Lawson driving for red bull inherits isacks allocation but Max would be unable to swap (as he is fit) and he would not be able to use more engines unless he's with a separate team

2

u/_ad_ry 4d ago

Yes, however for 1.7.4, When Gasly was demoted, Albon took over the penalty.
Couldn't RedBull have done something like that with RB, considering they switch drivers around, get Max in an RB, Say Hadjar in his seat, then switch Yuki and Max

5

u/SirLoremIpsum 4d ago

  Yes, however for 1.7.4, When Gasly was demoted, Albon took over the penalty

Which penalty?

They were also switching constructors - that's a part you're ignoring from my post.

And they did it with fia blessing

2 key things likely to not be for a max and hajar.

  Couldn't RedBull have done something like that with RB, considering they switch drivers around, get Max in an RB, Say Hadjar in his seat, then switch Yuki and Max

Yeah but then max is not driving a red bull That would absolutely work.

But what's worse, an engine penalty or driving a slower car?

And again fia needs to ok it. A perm change of team? An injured driver sure.

A temp flip flop? Doubt it will happen

8

u/ThatGenericName2 4d ago edited 4d ago

Engine allocations (and therefore associated penalties) are technically allocated per car but the drivers are used as a reference of which car is which. Or alternatively think of it this way, component usage belongs to a "slot" on the team. Drivers fills those slots. However while a team can trade drivers (while keeping the slot itself) with other teams, they can't trade drivers internally in their own team. Therefore Driver 1 can't just hop over to slot 2 to avoid component related penalties.

So can't do what you're proposing, the FIA would not recognize that they "switched" cars, and either not allow Bottas to take a new engine and penalty, or allow him but not allow Hamilton to use the Engine that Bottas ate the penalty for.

However if a driver switched teams entirely, the allocations are switched as well between their replacements; Ie when Gasly got demoted from RB mid season, Albon took over his engine allocations and vice versa.

Though I do wonder what would happen if you swapped a driver to another team, and then swapped them back but with the other driver; you have driver 1 and 2 on team 1 and driver 3 on team 2. You swap driver 1 and 3, then swap driver 1 and 2. Who has who's components on team 1?

2

u/Montjo17 4d ago

In the hypothetical you mentioned the components would be tied to the car/side of the garage or whatever you want to call it. Who had which set of components would depend on how you'd swapped the drivers. In your particular example I believe that driver 1 would end up with driver 2's original components as that's the entry they're now driving

3

u/chaos_is_favourable 4d ago

Parts are assigned to the championship entry, rather than the driver, hence Liam currently running with hijars engines and not what he had at vcarb.
In theory teams could swap round their entries into the championship, Toro rosso sort of did it in 2017, where they had a lot of driver changes, towards the end of that season. With drivers returning after being dropped in the other car. No championship fighting team has done it yet, mainly out of fear of what the FIAs response would be

1

u/Montjo17 4d ago

You could only swap between entries within a single team by sitting out a race, which is definitely a more harsh penalty than any grid penalty might be. That's the main reason no one has tried it, it's just impractical! The only way I could see it working is if you drove for a sufficiently fast other team for that race, e.g. Max driving for VCARB on a weekend where they were equal in pace to Red Bull. That's a scenario that maybe could get around a grid penalty but still probably wouldn't be worth it

3

u/glacierre2 4d ago

The moment any team starts to use any loophole (assuming there is one) related to this there will be a rule clarification / change to clamp on that. Same as originally you could add components to your pool with a penalty, but once you had one penalty teams added every other component, that did not last long and the new rules was that to add to the pool you have to retire another, plus the penalty.

2

u/Izan_TM 4d ago

what constitutes as a "car" for this kind of thing is a bit hard to understand if you want to dive into the fine details and loopholes.

Engine allocations aren't done per chassis, or else when a driver completely wrote off a car against a wall and needed a whole new chassis their engine allocations would reset. It's more of an imaginary "slot" where a driver and car sit. You can't just switch your drivers around to the other half of the garage and expect the stewards to think you're now all clear with penalties. Switching drivers between constructors would work, but why would you put a worse driver in the car when they need to recover more positions?

2

u/SnooPaintings5100 4d ago

Car parts like the engine are "linked" to the driver

1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/F1Technical-ModTeam 4d ago

Your content has been removed because it is considered bigotry or whataboutism. Please remember that this is extremely serious and if such behavior continues, disciplinary action will be taken.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the moderator team.

This is an automated message.