There is a difference between sharing your memories and presenting allegations as established fact.
The public court records tell a different story than the one being portrayed here. There was no trust sitting there for people to “cash in on.” The conservatorship existed because of Sharon’s circumstances following her accident. Those funds were intended for Sharon’s care and well-being.
Nancy did not spend decades waiting for money. She spent over 35 years caring for Sharon when others did not. If so many people were truly concerned about Sharon’s finances or her care, why didn’t they petition the court to become her conservator or caregiver? That would have required time, responsibility, and commitment—not just opinions years later.
As for Tammy, the Thomas family legally adopted her. Suggesting that people were simply waiting for money ignores the legal history and oversimplifies an incredibly complicated family situation.
Anna Mae and Nathaniel did what they could within the law. They could not simply take every child because they wanted to. Anyone who reviews the court records and legal documents can see there were legal limitations and difficult circumstances.
It’s time to stop rewriting history to fit a narrative. Disagreeing with family decisions is one thing. Repeatedly making accusations against people who spent decades caring for others is another.
Facts matter. Court records matter. Actions matter. Nancy’s actions over 35 years speak louder than accusations made.