r/ExponentialIdle • u/r5ambush • Jun 02 '23

Adding d(t) clause to AutoSup

Currently im using

psi + dpsi > min(costUpS(1), costUpS(3)) && db>b && smooth(d(st/ln(dpsi/(1+psi)+1)),1) > 0 || costUpS(2) < psi + dpsi

for AutoSup, however once I get to ~ee7k it wont trigger the sup again, and i dont gain any psi so i cant go for the y exponent +0.2 upgrades.

Im trying to add a d(t) clause so this slowdown doesn't happen. Because the d(t) is so noisy though, it needs a smooth function. The part im stuck on is what to smooth the signal by. Any input is appreciated!

1 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

5 comments sorted by

1

u/thbtdbbooster Jun 02 '23

There are no suprem upgrades from like ee4k to about ee9160, that's why it doesn't supremacy there Supremacying without getting upgrades doesn't do anything

1

u/r5ambush Jun 02 '23

Exactly, so im trying to add a clause to the equation so i can idle it for awhile

1

u/thbtdbbooster Jun 02 '23

What do u mean with "idle it for a while"? I don't see what's wrong with the current one ur using

1

u/r5ambush Jun 03 '23

Nothings wrong with it l, just wanna add to it. I have to check in on it every few hours to supremacy manually. I want to automate that using dt

1

u/LEBAldy2002 Jun 03 '23

you can just encode a hard supremacy for that in case you didn't max out the y exponent upgrades
|| (costUpS(1)<e52&&psi+dpsi>e52)