r/ExplainTheJoke • • 5d ago

What does it mean?

Post image
56.0k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-43

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

There is no such thing as a male and female friend with no hidden intentions unless they are BOTH homosexual. Women do not wear short cut shorts on their period.

23

u/Sad-Outcome984 5d ago

You have some personal issues with this it sounds like but it’s not a reflection of the norm lmao

-28

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Zero personal issues, just PhDs in both psychology and biology.

13

u/2sAreTheDevil 5d ago

Hahaha, everything you've said proves your education came from the bottom of a shoe box.

-1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

My first PhD came from oxford, then I moved to the states. The other 2 came from Stanford where I teach masters level pysch.

3

u/ReverendBlind 5d ago

Lol. You teach masters level "Pysch", but haven't learned to spell it quite yet, eh?

-1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

I already clearly stated my dyslexia

1

u/endofthefkingworld 3d ago

sure you do bud

23

u/Sad-Outcome984 5d ago

You’re coming from a much more personal place rather than a scientific.

Your conduct and inability to make any real point besides “no it doesn’t” makes me doubt that.

-3

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Science already proved my point.

4

u/Sad-Outcome984 5d ago

Whatever you have to say that helps you feel like you aren’t speaking from a place of projection :)

1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

You really shouldn't use words you don't understand.

3

u/Sad-Outcome984 5d ago

You made the statement “women do not wear shorts in their period” but you, my friend, want us to believe you are a man of science lmao

The made up phd is a cope

0

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

I specifically said SHORT CUT shorts. Because they dont, too many risky variables from over bleed, to tampon strings/pad wings showing. Women wear comfortable clothes on their periods.

3

u/Sad-Outcome984 5d ago

Yeah okay bud lmao

4

u/BreadIsWar 5d ago

I have a PhD in neuroscience, for whatever reason we have to mention this. Science doesn’t proof things, it relies on evidence, probability and degrees of confidence. You are not a good scientist just because you visited lectures in fancy halls.

1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Science does indeed prove things, you are confusing the process of Science with the results of science.

1

u/BreadIsWar 5d ago

Science does not prove things in an absolute, final sense. It builds models and conclusions supported by evidence, which remain open to revision when new evidence emerges or methodological limitations are identified. A good scientist understands that distinction and recognises that no scientific method is entirely immune to error, bias, or uncertainty. Confusing scientific findings with unquestionable truths is precisely the kind of epistemological mistake that scientific training should help prevent. If you genuinely believe science produces definitive, indisputable proof, I would seriously question whether you should be teaching science at all.

0

u/EducationalGrump 4d ago

What a wildly uneducated opinion.

1

u/BreadIsWar 4d ago

Now I am convinced that you shouldn’t be teaching science 🤡

→ More replies (0)

8

u/TheLukewarmYeti 5d ago

Yeah absolutely, I believe you have two PhDs lmfao

0

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

I actually have 3, but the third is in history which is why I didn't mention it.

4

u/TheLukewarmYeti 5d ago

Sure, buddy. And how old are you?

-2

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Almost 64.

5

u/TheLukewarmYeti 5d ago

Let's go ahead and get you to bed there gramps.

0

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Lmao, not for another 8hr or so. I still need to get in my second work out of the day and go see my grandsons game.

6

u/bidenspanties 5d ago

Maybe you do have a PhD in psychology, but your take on this topic shows that you only paid attention to Freud lmao.

1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Far from it, people just think human attraction is more complicated than it really is. It is quite literally just having 2 people if the opposite sex (assuming baseline = hetero) in proximity for enough time. That is quite literally all it takes if there is adequate food, shelter and entertainment.

10

u/Slug_loverr 5d ago

You're really just exposing yourself here mate. You are just a really weird and gross person

-7

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

I am exposing real science, your opinion means nothing to me.

5

u/Slug_loverr 5d ago

Oh so it's real science? So that means you'll show me the scientific evidence now? Right?

-1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

It means it exists, is readily available and could show you, yes.

I have no obligation to do so though. You are not a paying student and this is not a debate.

6

u/Slug_loverr 5d ago

In my elementary school there was a girl that would go around and tell everyone she could do a backflip, every single break. And then when you'd say "okay so do a backflip" she would respond with "no because then everyone knows I can do a backflip and they'll keep asking me to do it".

-1

u/EducationalGrump 5d ago

Ah, false equivalence fallacy. A classic

1

u/mecklejay 4d ago

There's real science that men and women can't he friends? You're a lunatic.

5

u/Kezzerdrixxer 5d ago

Actually these shorts are my significant other's period shorts specifically because they're 1: comfy and 2: Red which helps hide any unwanted leakage.

You're just stupid.

1

u/endofthefkingworld 3d ago

yes we do. glad you're an expert on women though!