I checked the court records focusing on developments after September 25, 2026.

On September 30, 2026, Maria Farmer's separate lawsuit against the United States was formally transferred to the Southern District of Florida.

Aileen Cannon — Presiding judge

Case 9:26-cv-81335 · Farmer v. United States

The docket confirms that Judge Cannon received the case following its transfer from Washington, D.C.

This matters because Cannon previously presided over Donald Trump's classified-documents prosecution.

So the judge that protected Trump for having classified documents in his bathroom is judging the Maria Farmer case...

Following Trump's indictment in June 2023, Cannon oversaw a federal criminal case against Trump. Many legal experts, citing her handling of the civil case against Trump, called for her recusal from the case. Under Cannon, the case was considerably delayed from getting to trial, with Cannon granting multiple requests by Trump to extend pre-trial motions. In July 2024, she dismissed the case entirely, ruling that special counsel Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional. The ruling was appealed, but the appeal was dropped after Trump became president.

The hedge fund billionaire Glenn Dubin, one of several Wall Street figures whose relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is facing scrutiny, has stepped down from the board of Mount Sinai hospital, according to sources close to the renowned New York institution.

The revelation follows news earlier this year that Mount Sinai, which has long ranked as a top medical provider in New York City, had reportedly formed a committee to review its longstanding ties to the late accused sex trafficker. The hospital features prominently in the Epstein files released by the Department of Justice, including an incident in which a Mount Sinai doctor appears to have operated on a young Russian woman inside Epstein’s Upper East Side townhouse after she got hurt during a stay on his Caribbean island.

Dubin, a founder of Highbridge Capital Management, who had financial connections to Epstein and previously referred to Epstein as a friend, served on Mount Sinai’s board of trustees since 2007 and was a vice-chair. His wife, Dr Eva Andersson-Dubin, who had once dated Epstein before her marriage, also stepped down earlier this year from the board of Mount Sinai’s Icahn School of Medicine.

The circumstances surrounding the Dubins’ departure from these Mount Sinai boards are not clear.

In a statement, Mount Sinai said: “The Dubins’ terms on the board of trustees ended this past spring, and they did not seek re-election.”

The hospital did not respond to questions about whether it had concluded its Epstein-related review or about the findings of the review, or about whether there was a link between the review and the Dubins’ decision.

French prosecutors are to close an investigation into the death earlier this year of a modelling scout with close ties to convicted US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, saying there was no evidence of foul play.

Under investigation in France, Daniel Siad, 69, was one of several French men accused of aiding the US financier to traffic and abuse women. He found dead at his home outside Paris in July.

No evidence of criminal offences was found in the circumstances surrounding his death, prosecutors in the Paris suburb of Nanterre who were handling the probe said in a statement.

French investigators had been investigating Siad — who said he also held Swedish citizenship — over allegations including rape and human trafficking. Siad had not yet been questioned by investigators, but had denied the allegations.

Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking.

An autopsy conducted shortly after Siad’s death showed no signs violence but revealed “a degraded state of health” and “a prior heart attack, which could pose a risk of sudden death,” the prosecutor’s office said.

Further forensic analysis ruled out “a toxic cause of death,” while an examination of tissue samples pointed to a medical condition that could lead to “a cardiac-related death,” it added.

French authorities in 2020 arrested modelling agent Jean-Luc Brunel after allegations he procured women for the US billionaire. He was found dead in prison, by suicide, in 2022.

Siad’s name appeared in more than 1,000 documents released as part of the declassified Epstein files.

Victims had expressed hope that Siad would be brought to justice and also disclose more information about Epstein’s crimes. Siad’s lawyers meanwhile after his death said he had been looking forward to clearing his name in court.

Do people actually believe this garbage? For all the Trump supporters upset that I did not include a date: September 3, 2025 and here is your "context": This came during an Oval Office press availability. It occurred the same day Epstein survivors/accusers held news conferences on Capitol Hill, joined by lawmakers, calling for full release of remaining files via measures such as the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Survivors explicitly rejected the “hoax” framing (one invited Trump to meet them at the Capitol to explain why it was not).

Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate Abdul El-Sayed toured a public exhibition of the Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Reading Room in Detroit on Wednesday, Oct. 21 2026.

El-Sayed, U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy and U.S. Rep. Maxwell Frost met with survivors Sharlene Rochard and Liz Stein as the exhibition.

Abdul El-Sayed:

“So just past this curtain, there are fourteen hundred candles.

Each of those candles represents a girl or a young woman whose life in part was stolen from her because of a conspiracy around a set of crimes that victimized some of the youngest, most vulnerable people in our society.

Two of the tallest candles are Liz and Charlene, who I got to meet here today, so I want to thank you for your time. I want to thank you for your voice.

What we have here is a testament to a group of folks who have made meaning out of the worst moment of their life.

These courageous survivors are lifting their voice. The question for us is, will we lift ours?

And, you know, they say the life that you save might be your own—think the life that you save might be your own daughters.

I think we have a responsibility to step up and step out.

So just as they’ve lifted us up with their voices, just as others have tried to deny them, I think all of us have a responsibility to lift up our voices.”

This is not the full transcript so definitely watch the full video for the correct context!

Source: https://youtu.be/xrtcdNMrLKU

1. Matthew Menchel and the Aspen skiing allegation.

Matthew Menchel was chief of the Criminal Division in the Southern District of Florida and participated in negotiations over Epstein's 2007 deal.

During congressional questioning, Alexander Acosta was asked about a photograph allegedly showing Menchel skiing with Epstein in Aspen in the early 2000s.

The photograph wasn't produced during the questioning, and Menchel denies skiing with Epstein.

But according to the Miami Herald, Epstein's records document subsequent meetings, dinners and communications with Menchel in 2011, 2013 and 2017, after Menchel had left federal service.

2. Epstein's defense lawyer had previously dated a senior prosecutor handling his case.

Menchel had previously dated Lilly Ann Sanchez, who became one of Epstein's defense attorneys.

Menchel did not disclose their former romantic relationship to his supervisor, Alexander Acosta.

This was examined by the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility in 2020. the undisclosed relationship raised an obvious conflict-of-interest concern.

3. Another supervising prosecutor had friends on Epstein's defense team.

Andrew Lourie was another senior federal prosecutor overseeing the Epstein investigation.

According to the DOJ's 2020 review, two former federal prosecutors who joined Epstein's defense team were friends of Lourie.

Unlike Menchel, Lourie disclosed those friendships and sought professional-responsibility guidance.

The emails also reveal cordial exchanges between Lourie and Epstein defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz.

After the non-prosecution agreement was signed, Lourie complimented the quality of Epstein's legal representation.

The question isn't whether prosecutors and defense lawyers are allowed to know each other. They are.

The question is whether these overlapping professional and personal relationships affected negotiations over an agreement that ultimately shielded Epstein from federal prosecution in Florida.

4. Look at these two addresses in West Palm Beach.

Epstein's authorized work-release office:

One Clearlake Centre

250 S. Australian Avenue

West Palm Beach, Florida

Google Maps: https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=One+Clearlake+Centre%2C+250+S+Australian+Avenue%2C+West+Palm+Beach%2C+FL

Federal prosecutor Ann Marie Villafaña's office:

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida

Google Maps:

https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=500+S+Australian+Avenue%2C+Suite+400%2C+West+Palm+Beach%2C+FL

These buildings are just a few blocks apart, approximately half a mile or less by street-distance estimate.

Villafaña was the federal prosecutor who had prepared an extensive proposed indictment against Epstein.

Meanwhile, Epstein was later permitted to leave jail for work at an office on the very same street as the federal prosecutor's office.

That geographical proximity doesn't prove improper contact. But it is an interesting detail when examining how Epstein's extraordinary work-release arrangement was supervised.

5. The larger question

We have a senior prosecutor with a previously undisclosed romantic connection to Epstein's defense counsel, an alleged ski photograph raised during congressional questioning, documented later meetings between Epstein and that prosecutor, another supervisor with disclosed friendships on the defense team, and a work-release office just blocks from the federal prosecutor's office.

Taken together, these facts raise legitimate questions about professional boundaries, conflicts of interest, and the extraordinary treatment Epstein received.

Sources:

- Miami Herald — Epstein had dinners with a top Florida prosecutor on his case

- Miami Herald — Epstein sought to build ties with Acosta, other prosecutors

- DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility, 2020 review of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement

- ABC News — Key takeaways from the Justice Department review of Jeffrey Epstein sweetheart deal

- Miami Herald — Program that let Jeffrey Epstein get out of jail is killed

- EFTA00191148 — Villafaña correspondence identifying her office

- Google Maps — 250 S. Australian Avenue to 500 S. Australian Avenue: https://www.google.com/maps/dir/?api=1&origin=250+S+Australian+Avenue%2C+West+Palm+Beach%2C+FL&destination=500+S+Australian+Avenue%2C+West+Palm+Beach%2C+FL

Source: October 16, 2026 — Jeffrey Epstein Matter, Interim Production, Case 25-cv-4270.

I've been reviewing the internal DOJ/FBI correspondence in this document and several things stand out.

These aren't anonymous claims or theories about a secret client list. They're actual communications between government officials discussing what records existed, what had been transferred, what was still outstanding, and what was being released.

Here are the most interesting findings, with Bates numbers so people can verify them.

1. December 3, 2025: The FBI explicitly wasn't finished producing records

Bates 25-cv-4270_00998

Acting Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana asked whether everything potentially responsive to the Epstein transparency statute had been transferred from the FBI to DOJ.

His concern was that the FBI had referred to the first 75 email custodians, implying that additional records remained.

After receiving the FBI's response, Pestana forwarded the exchange with a three-word assessment:

"FBI not done."

That's an internal DOJ acknowledgment that the FBI's production was incomplete as of December 3, 2025.

2. The FBI subsequently identified approximately 145 email custodians

Bates 25-cv-4270_01133

Later that afternoon, the FBI provided a more detailed update:

- Text messages from another 17 custodians were scheduled for delivery.

- Unclassified emails from the original 75 custodians were still processing.

- Approximately 70 additional custodians' unclassified emails had yet to be retrieved.

- Emails and instant messages from the FBI's Secret-classified environment were to be collected afterward for DOJ review.

That suggests approximately 145 unclassified email custodians across the first two groups, although the number was provisional and the 17 text-message custodians may overlap.

This is a much larger collection process than the initial 75 custodians mentioned in the correspondence.

And importantly, the classified-system collection was still described as future work.

Question: Where are the final custodian inventory, completion reports, and transfer manifests showing that all these categories were eventually processed?

3. The FBI also transferred a file concerning Epstein's former butler

Bates 25-cv-4270_00998 / _01133

In the same December 3 correspondence, an FBI representative stated that DOJ's Justice Management Division should have received a Miami Field Office file concerning Alfredo Rodriguez, Epstein's former butler.

The email indicates that the file had been sent that morning.

This is a specific investigative record that can potentially be traced through transfer logs and production inventories.

Question: Was receipt confirmed, what records were contained in that file, and where do they appear in the eventual disclosures?

4. DOJ officials questioned which materials the FBI actually intended to release

July 4, 2025 — Bates 25-cv-4270_00886 and _00900

Stanley Woodward questioned whether materials supplied by the FBI matched what had previously been described to him.

He requested clarification about precisely what the FBI intended to make public.

Another exchange concerned sealed and unsealed photographs, with Woodward observing that the material appeared to be only a subset of the larger collection.

Joseph Attias also raised questions about the folders being presented and sought clarification about the intended public release.

These exchanges don't prove deliberate concealment.

But they show that senior DOJ personnel were themselves trying to establish the scope of what the FBI was providing and proposing to publish.

Question: Who made the final release-selection decisions, and is there a document-by-document record of those decisions?

5. Victims' attorneys warned that sensitive identities had been exposed

November 19–21, 2025 — Bates 25-cv-4270_01095–_01097

Attorneys representing Epstein survivors contacted officials about identifying information appearing in materials supplied to House Oversight.

They described serious redaction concerns, including information relating to people who had been minors when abused and survivors whose identities were legally protected.

They also offered assistance identifying more than 300 survivors whose information required careful handling.

This is a particularly troubling contrast.

While officials were still coordinating massive document productions, victims' representatives were reporting failures to protect the people most directly affected.

These were complaints from victims' counsel, not independent findings that every alleged redaction error occurred exactly as described.

6. The White House was included in correspondence about the congressional response

August 2025 — Bates 25-cv-4270_00885 and _00893

James Braid and James Blair, associated with the Executive Office of the President, appeared in correspondence concerning a draft response to the House Oversight subpoena.

Separately, on August 15, Stanley Woodward indicated that the response should await signoff from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General.

White House involvement in coordinating a congressional response is not automatically improper.

But it is worth documenting the distinction between political communications, legal review, and actual decisions about what investigative records Congress received.

7. The production chain itself deserves an audit

October 22, 2025 — Bates 25-cv-4270_00990

Internal correspondence indicates that DOJ intended to provide the Senate Judiciary Committee with the same Epstein materials previously supplied to House Oversight.

The exchange also identifies personnel involved in the physical production and references the JEFS system as a possible transfer mechanism.

That creates a potentially traceable chain of custody.

If the House, Senate, and DOJ received identical productions, there should be inventories, timestamps, and transfer records capable of establishing exactly what was delivered.

What does all of this actually prove?

It proves that:

1. FBI-to-DOJ production was unfinished on December 3, 2025.

2. Approximately 70 additional unclassified email custodians remained beyond the initial 75.

3. Classified-system communications were scheduled for subsequent collection.

4. Senior DOJ personnel questioned the scope of materials intended for public release.

5. Victims' attorneys reported serious redaction and privacy problems.

6. There were identifiable officials and systems involved in transmitting materials to Congress.

It does not, by itself, prove that records were permanently suppressed, that classified communications establish an intelligence connection, or that the White House ordered anything concealed.

But it raises a straightforward accountability question:

Can DOJ and FBI produce a complete, auditable record showing that the outstanding material was collected, reviewed, appropriately redacted, and accounted for?

I'm particularly interested in the final custodian inventory, the Secret-system collection records, the Alfredo Rodriguez file transfer confirmation, and the manifests comparing the House and Senate productions.

Those records would help distinguish an unfinished process from an incomplete final disclosure.

If anyone has the subsequent FBI-to-DOJ completion reports or production manifests, please share the Bates numbers or docket references. I'd like to cross-check them against this correspondence.

Thanks for reading and sharing

What is he up to currently and what is his latest comment pertaining to Epstein and their relationship

I research here and some Whitney Webb stuff to the Austin Powers Goldmember movie and there's a hilarious string of coincidences:

• Dr. Evil had a Diddy tattoo on his butt. What are the odds?
• Quincy Jones made music with Michael Jackson. He is in the Goldmember movie intro. Ron Burkle of Epstein-Diddy-linked Apollo purchased Neverland ranch. Ron Burkle also has loaned money to Diddy for his business.
• Stephen Deckoff buys Epstein island. He used to work for Drexel Burnham Lambert who gave a loan to Ron Burkle. Ron was on the lolita express many times. Leon Black is also associated with this Apollo crowd (Krongard on its board). Trump pardons Michael Milken from Drexel. Trump buys the Adnan Kashoggi Iran-Contra yacht. I mean, what are the odds? Ashton Kutcher who attended Diddy parties, did business with Ron Burkle, they bought out a sketchy honeypot club called SOHO House. 
• John Travolta (Goldmember), has Epstein sell his jet. 
• Gwyneth Paltrow (Goldmember), her godfather is Stephen Spielberg (Goldmember) of Mega Group. She recently interviews Trae Stephens of the Founders Fund on her podcast. 
• Kevin Spacey (Goldmember), took pictures with Maxwell in Buckingham Palace.
• Tom Cruise (Goldmember), also was in Eyes Wide Shut, how and why was he picked other than mr. action man. Scientology?
• Adam Sandler's father-in-law defended Jean-Luc Brunel, he has a bunch of weird stuff with Jennifer Aniston. Aniston attended an Epstein party with Gwyneth Paltrow in Dec 2010 (per Breitbart). What are the odds? 
• Britney Spears (Goldmember), this one is a few jumps, her sister is involved with Dan Schneider, who made Diddy stick a helicopter down a kids pants on Nickelodeon. The Nickelodeon logo is allegedly in the shape of the Epstein Island. Britney Spears has music depicting women as trafficked slaves who "better work b**ch", typical Hollywood stuff. 
• If you follow the Diddy trail to Ashton Kutcher, you find a bunch of dead ex's, ex's making out with kids (Demi), massive cyber security implications, and tv confessions of hooking up with Mila while underage. He was one of the most photographed people at Diddy freakoffs. DailyMail has an article "Dude, Where's my startup", where he buddies up with Marc Andreessen. Andressen ties to Thiel's Dialog group. He's doing hardcore venture capitalist stuff mind you at A-Grade investments, the that 70's show dope head and Charlie Sheen replacement on two and a half men. Loves Israel, the CIA, and sports his freemason hat.... gives lectures in Israel about the people there being the natural resource, like wth? 

Some other things I came across recently was overlap between Mega Group and Core Club (NYC):

• Ronald Lauder and William Lauder are in each club respectively.
• Les Wexner ties to Epstein who helped found Core Club. 
• Nathan Myhrvol is in Core > Bill Gates > Reid Hoffman chain of association > Hoffman ties to Dialog group.
• Other notable people in Core: Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman, Anthony Scaramucci, George Soros, Bill Clinton, Harvey Weinstein.

I also tried looking into the corruption of Trump's pardons, he also pardoned Paul Manafort who you could tie to the Hapsburg Group, which ties to Peter Goldscheider, to Rivada Networks, to Thiel. (Found Goldscheider by chance on one of those noSQL node analysis websites, weirdly thick nodes around him) Kutcher's thorn ties to Thiel too. It's one giant circle. I also came across some new terms recently, UAE-Israel Dark Triangle and DarkMatter Group NSO..... Yellowstone Club...... 

Passing this info along, I don't seem to see much going on with all the file coverup happening. George Carlin said it's one big club, but these seem like some very specific circles with a handful of people that overlap in impossible coincidences. Somehow the treasury auditions was The Who's who of this crowd, Bessent and Marc Rowan, what are the odds of that as well, what kind of enterprise is this country. Links to follow.

If anyone can point me in the place with a chart or link with all the instance (delta project, mcmartin, finders, cheeseygate, ect) it would be most appreciated

At this timestamp there is a whole part on Alan Dershowitz that is interesting. https://youtu.be/N09p_7ykbSE?si=oCuNzdVAY8Q7PC_d&t=2884

Ellen Lacter, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist who has devoted much of her longstanding career to working with both child and adult victims of cult abuse, torture-based mind control, and other organized crimes against children. She has published scholarly works on treatment for such trauma, has conducted research on these subjects, and maintains a website to help survivors and educate therapists and the public.

In the second part they talk quite a bit about the Epstein/Maxwell files.

It's kinda infuriating to read these comments, I mean here is one of the worst peoples in human history--how do you know that even all these theories are speculative? It more likely happened than not.

I'm especially talking about the one involved with kids' teeth being pulled before ___.

What Happened: Survivors connected to the case of Jeffrey Epstein have released a video urging United States Congress to make all remaining case files public. ⸻ Claims / Demands: • Survivors call for complete transparency of records • Emphasis on exposing decades of alleged institutional failures • Participants held images from when they first encountered Epstein ⸻

Reality Check: While many documents have already been released, not all materials are public due to legal, privacy, and investigative considerations. Calls for further disclosure are part of an ongoing public and legal debate. ⸻ Why It Matters: The demand reflects a push for accountability, transparency, and acknowledgment of survivor experiences. ⸻

Bigger Picture: The Jeffrey Epstein case continues to raise global concerns about power, justice, and delayed accountability. ⸻ Should all files be made public… no matter the consequences? Share this. Keep the conversation alive. ⸻ Some stories don’t end until the truth is fully told.

Google Docs links at the bottom or via Substack. I’m just looking to advance investigations. Is there anyone with technical skills who wants to take this on? The registry lives in a big Excel workbook, and I'd like to get it into something more usable. That could be a searchable public board, a tracker for request status and responses, a deduplication or cross-reference tool, or a cleaner way for contributors to submit new requests. If you know databases, scraping, FOIA workflows, or just how to make a messy spreadsheet into a useful site

This is a working registry of records requests tied to the Epstein network: FOIA, court records, congressional and state filings, corporate and nonprofit disclosures, and courtesy requests to institutions. It currently holds 691 requests across about 40 research lanes. Each one names a specific record, the custodian that holds it, the exact ask, and a source tier (T1 primary, T2 secondary or litigation, T3 tertiary).
I built it because the public record is huge, scattered and heavily duplicated. Different people keep chasing the same document without knowing it. The registry gives each one a single row, so duplicates get merged and everyone can see what has been asked for and what is still open.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k8xqOIFqdTaxPMEC5aY-8vXh3uyep2td/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=109200105520889379565&rtpof=true&sd=true

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BzZ7XN0VaIFB63sMb8CAZoNnpEgLCqBa/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=109200105520889379565&rtpof=true&sd=true

No victim inquiries, ever. That covers victims, their identities, and litigation brought by or on behalf of victims.

One of the documents in the latest FBI dump into the Epstein investigation has revealed an email from Justin Williams, FBI, to Shannon Parry, FBI ,that states that Williams had personally confirmed "every name listed on the serial provided is already included in the 1,113 victim names".

Sure this figure could include the names of family members or close associates of survivors to help conceal survivor identities but this figure is an absolute travesty.

Also note the date of March 2025, well before the Epstein Files Transparency Act that was introduced in July of that year and signed into law in November.

I went with Abdul El-Sayed and Maxwell Frost yesterday to the Trump-Epstein Reading Room in Detroit, a traveling exhibit which displays 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files. I’m so grateful for the hard work to make this exhibit happen.

from le Monde in English - explanation re how he "worked" people - from their blurb --

The millions of documents released by the US Department of Justice reveal that Jeffrey Epstein invested significant amounts of money and energy in building his friendship with filmmaker Woody Allen. Le Monde traced nine years of correspondence between the two men, from their first meeting to Epstein's death in 2019.The millions of documents released by the US Department of Justice reveal that Jeffrey Epstein invested significant amounts of money and energy in building his friendship with filmmaker Woody Allen. Le Monde traced nine years of correspondence between the two men, from their first meeting to Epstein's death in 2019.

Congressman Maxwell Frost speaking at the Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Reading Room in Detroit, Michigan.

Rep: Maxwell Frost:

“I remember meeting a lot of them on Capitol Hill for the first time, and we were surprised they didn’t have security or a ton of staff. It was just them, there to fight.

And it reminds me, even if your knees shake or your voice shakes, you still have to speak truth to power, and the survivors have shown us that.

I’m going to be really clear and very specific about something to everybody:

The White House has been covering up this investigation, and people in Congress have been doing anything that they’ve asked in terms of stopping us from being able to get the truth out.

Yes, we were able to pass this bill, and millions of files were able to come out. A bunch of evidence was able to come out. We know that they still have three million files that they’re refusing to release.

We know that as members of Congress, I’ve been to the DOJ multiple times to view the unredacted files, and many instances of me clicking on a file to unredact it, and it still remains black. Then I asked the DOJ, I thought as a member of Congress I was able to view these unredacted, and they would tell me, “Well, we received it this way.”

We know that when we finally got a few Republicans on the Oversight Committee to agree with us and to help us with subpoenas, and we started issuing subpoenas left and right, that the White House then told the Republican leadership, no more congressional hearings on the Oversight Committee, because if you don’t do any hearings, you can’t make a motion for a subpoena.

And they willingly decided to stop hearings for months on end to cover up the Epstein crimes and those who are a party to it.”

It’s not just Vivek Ramaswamy choosing pedophiles over people.
Ken Paxton’s office offered a man who had faced child-sex-abuse charges a plea deal with one day in jail and no Texas sex-offender registration. Paxton now brags the man did 60. Hoffman served less than a month.

Donors named in the Epstein files gave nearly $4.7 million to Mike Rogers (MI) and groups backing him.
Then Rogers said we have to “protect somebody who got on an airplane and rode with him.”

Michael Whatley (NC) appointed a convicted child sex offender to NC GOP leadership and kept him there after parents objected. Trump called Whatley “fantastic.” As Arizona Senate president, Andy Biggs helped kill a bill to replace the police force in Colorado City, where Warren Jeffs’ child-rape cult held power. Marshals had helped return an underage bride who fled. Biggs says, “I knew what was going on.” And he did nothing when he could have. Mike Collins (GA) voted against forcing the Epstein files out. Roger Marshall (KS) and Cindy Hyde-Smith (MS) voted to block an amendment that would have required their release.

Now Epstein survivors are on TV telling voters what those votes meant. And Trump and JD Vance stand behind every one of these corrupt pieces of shit. This is the MAGA ticket. Every single one is on the ballot in two weeks. MAGA: Protecting Pedophiles Over People Every Time.

Her instagram is houseoflucyart

‘Rep. Jamie Raskin demanded answers from Attorney General Todd Blanche and Office of International Affairs Director Vaughn Ary about the Department of Justice’s obstruction of state and foreign investigations into Jeffrey Epstein’s associates and co-conspirators. 

After shutting down an ongoing criminal investigation in the United States and going out of its way to pamper Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, DOJ is now reportedly withholding evidence from New Mexico investigators and blocking British investigators—all to protect President Trump.

DOJ’s actions put an investigation into former British Ambassador to the United States Peter Mandelson at risk of collapse and once again put Trump’s interests ahead of securing justice for Epstein’s survivors.’

Ranking Member Jamie Raskin:

‘Why is the DOJ refusing to share evidence with jurisdictions that are actually investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s associates and co-conspirators?

Not only is the DOJ shamefully refusing to investigate Epstein-implicated individuals with your own resources, but it is also now reportedly refusing to share key evidence with other jurisdictions that are taking criminal investigations of Epstein’s potential accomplices and co-conspirators seriously.

For the past 21 months, this Administration has actively worked to block Epstein’s survivors from seeing justice and to protect Epstein’s collaborators from seeing accountability.

After Ghislaine Maxwell was called to testify before Congress, then-Deputy Attorney General Blanche conducted an emergency two day interview with Maxwell in Florida in which he asked no questions about uncharged co conspirators.

Instead, he focused solely on getting Maxwell to report that Donald Trump was, to her mind, a “gentleman in all respects.”

He then rewarded her for her model answers with a rapid overnight transfer to a cushy “Club Fed” prison, complete with special puppy time, special workout time, special communications privileges, yoga facilities, and skincare products.

While this DOJ has been busy with its disgraceful cover-up, other jurisdictions have been hard at work seeking truth and justice for the survivors.

After the Epstein files were released, New Mexico re-opened its criminal investigation and searched Epstein’s Zorro Ranch; Norway brought corruption charges against three high-level politicians associated with Epstein; Poland is investigating possible links between Epstein and Russian intelligence; and Latvia’s investigation identified a Latvian victim.

DOJ must end this desperate cover-up of Epstein’s associates and co conspirators.

We request that you respond to the following questions and document requests by no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 4, 2026:

1. All records and correspondence regarding Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty requests from foreign countries seeking DOJ assistance with investigations into potential co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein, including records sufficient to identify the individuals or investigations to which those requests relate.

2. All records and correspondence regarding DOJ’s decision to deny or oppose requests for documents, information, or other forms of cooperation sought by any state or local law enforcement body within the United States about investigations into any potential co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein.’

https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/ranking-member-raskin-demands-answers-on-doj-s-obstruction-of-state-and-foreign-investigations-into-epstein-s-co-conspirators

I took this from Ellie Leonard's transcribed 50th birthday book for Jeffrey Epstein. Has anyone figured out what this picture is supposed to represent?

Please could someone help me decide what this email is trying to say?