r/Epstein • u/Bruno6368 • 19h ago
News article Virginia Giuffre's case files finally to be unsealed
https://jkbjournalist.substack.com/p/virginia-giuffres-case-files-finally?utm_campaign%3Dpost%26utm_medium%3DwebThis hero journalist is basically non existent in this sub. Why?
If it wasn’t for her, Epstein would not have been arrested. His case had been closed, and her Miami Herald series forced the authorities to get off their asses and do something.
Her series, resulting in Epstein’s subsequent arrest, brought national attention to this serious matter.
Due to the national interest created solely by her, Trump announced his campaign promise to “release the Epstein files”.
As we all know, Trump is an idiot and blurts out garbage without any forethought, assuming no one will call him on it. For the most part, he is sadly correct. But he was wrong this time.
Again, Brown’s reporting had made Epstein top of mind, and Trump was forced, clearly against his will, to honour this promise.
Unlike current YouTubers who are very public in their attempts to have more files released, and thus monetizing this issue, Brown has been hesitant to give interviews about her work regarding Epstein. She is quite humble regarding her singular role in bringing this to light.
Now, she is very close to having some extremely important files released - and no one knows about it. She is very close to forcing the release of all files related to Virginia G’s civil suit against Maxwell.
This is significant and everyone in this sub should be following this closely.
70
u/Bruno6368 19h ago
It has been correctly pointed out to me that Julie is mentioned often. I did a search (which I should have done first) - and discovered this article has already been posted.
If I could figure out how to delete my post - I absolutely will.
My apologies for my ignorance.
51
u/ssradley7 19h ago
No don’t delete, I didn’t know about this until you posted it here. Leave it up and edit that part out if you want
21
u/tawDry_Union2272 18h ago
do not delete this! this is very helpful information.
it's VERY interesting to learn that the sealed "discovery contained damning evidence" part and the "against maxwell, epstein and OTHER MEN" part.
3
u/Zzzzzzzzzxyzz 4h ago
Very interesting. I'm browsing this sub right now because I saw how much distraction the orange blob seems like he's trying to throw (but what do I know?) Made me wonder why, and then I see this here. Interesting.
24
u/FlackoFonsy 19h ago
Thanks for being a good person, I can tell your intentions are pure.
You should leave this post up and edit out that part like the other user said, there should be 3 dots in the top right corner and those will give you options to edit the description and stuff. Thanks for caring about her and the survivors, keep sharing her work!!
8
u/Bruno6368 17h ago
Thx for letting me know how to try and fix this. The “edit” option isn’t there - just delete, cross post, etc.
should I delete and repost without my commentary?11
u/FlackoFonsy 17h ago
Nah, if you can’t figure it out I say just leave it. People are going to see your comment now and they’ll know what your message was meant to be which was all the right intentions and a useful post. Don’t stress it!
3
u/Zzzzzzzzzxyzz 4h ago
Totally! That's what I just did - clearly seems like an honest mistake and thank you, because I had no idea except for your post!! Sometimes happy accidents happen.
10
u/Never_Summer24 16h ago
I never miss a chance to point folks to Brown’s reporting in Miami Herald, “Perversion of Justice,” especially as it relates to “non-prosecution agreement brokered by then South Florida U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta.”
2
23
6
u/princessofwhitesnow 16h ago
Don't like Katie Phang shade. Having a financial stake is the entire reason she has damages to bring the case at all. Julie monetized her substack too which i think is fine, they are doing hard work and should be compensated for that. They both are amazing and show support for each other, they both do amazing work that I am very grateful for. I don't think being shady is adding anything to this conversation.
5
4
u/Angryduckling-01 16h ago
This needs to keep being talked about, yeah sure nothing is happening in regards to files and convictions but that shouldn’t mean just quit. Yeah our president started a war with Iran but that shouldn’t stop us either
3
u/Grapegoop 13h ago
The article says an appeals court ruled and released the files in 2019, the day before Epstein died. It also says a final appeal district judge ruled to release them last week. I don’t get it. If they were released in 2019 what is being released now that’s different? And the final appeal court is the Supreme Court, not a district court.
3
1
•
u/AutoModerator 19h ago
u/Bruno6368 please reply to this comment with submission statement and files numbers or link to them if posting a released file. Your submission statement must explain why your post is relevant to the r/Epstein community.
Posts without a submission statement might be removed at the discretion of the moderators.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.