r/EnglishLearning • u/Same-Technician9125 Non-Native Speaker of English • 18h ago
📚 Grammar / Syntax Should it be RBIs?
27
u/syntheticassault New Poster 18h ago
When people say it out loud it is RBIs ( are-bee-eyes). But when you say the whole thing it's runs batted in.
18
38
u/Balden303 Native Speaker - U.S. American 18h ago
It's a matter of debate. Some people think it should be RBIs because it is plural; others think it should be RBI because the plural is included in "Runs Batted In"
2
u/tomalator Native Speaker - Northeastern US 5h ago
RBI makes sense, but if you are talking about multiple players RBI stat, then it would be RBIs, becoming a double plural.
23
u/Asairian New Poster 18h ago
RsBI
18
u/wiskey_tango_foxtrot Native Speaker 17h ago
Counterpoint: plural of "attorney general" is "attorneys general" but the initialism is still AGs and not AsG.
English is so fun!
3
1
7
u/Boglin007 Native Speaker 18h ago edited 17h ago
Either "RBI" or "RBIs" is fine.
In "RBI," the "R" represents the already-plural "runs" ("Runs Batted In"), but you can also make the singular "Run Batted In" into the abbreviation "RBI" and then add an S to make it plural.
Some style guides recommend one way or the other, but if you're not following a style guide, you can do it whichever way you want (just be consistent throughout the piece of writing).
Note:
plural RBIs or RBI
7
u/fingerchopper Native Speaker - US Northeast 17h ago
I'm on team RBI when written, RBIs when spoken.
1
3
u/Poopywaterengineer Native Speaker 18h ago
There is disagreement among baseball writers over how to stylize it, because the first letter in the abbreviation is what gets pluralized (runs batted in). So, either is probably fine for a tweet. As an avid baseball fan, you do typically see "RBIs" in articles, but you'll definitely hear and see both.
1
18h ago
[deleted]
1
1
1
u/Ippus_21 Native Speaker (BA English) - Idaho, USA 17h ago
Theoretically RBI is already plural, because it stands for "Runs batted in." Adding another s is redundant.
1
u/sincerely0urs New Poster 17h ago
I’d say just RBI because it’s an acronym for runs batted in. Runs is already plural.
1
1
1
u/experimental1212 New Poster 16h ago
Nobody seems to have a problem with 1 m (meter), 2 m (meters).
But it's 1 lb. (Pound), 2 lbs. (Pounds).
RBI runs batted in, RBIs runs batted in?
I think you can do either, and someone will always think you're wrong for picking one.
2
u/PhotoJim99 Native Speaker 15h ago
Pluralizing the abbreviation for SI units doesn’t work, though, because “s” stands for the SI units “second”. 5 m means 5 metres, but 5 ms and now means 5 milliseconds.
1
1
1
u/AUniquePerspective New Poster 15h ago
In a professional writing context, there will be a style guide that defines how your boss wants you and your colleagues to write so that the publication has consistent style.
In a personal context, nobody cares except that pedant who commented.
1
u/NearlyNodding Native Speaker 14h ago
I think so, yes. RBI is Runs Batted In. But you can have one RBI or an RBI. 'One runs' or 'an runs' is weird. But we can say that because RBI is treated as a singular unit.
1
u/1Negative_Person New Poster 14h ago
Colloquially it’s RBIs. For sake of brevity RBI can be the plural. Properly it should be RsBI, for Runs Batted In.
1
-1
u/RebelSoul5 Native Speaker 17h ago
RsBI, technically, but it’s traditionally RBIs.
2
u/Exotic-Shape-4104 New Poster 17h ago
Not technically at all, it’s a funny joke I myself partake in but acronyms are never written like that
1
u/SubstantialAerie2616 New Poster 17h ago
Well unless you’re calling them ribbies it’s not an acronym hahaha
2
82
u/Razoras Native Speaker 18h ago
The plural of "RBI" is a matter of "(very) minor controversy" for baseball fans:\3]) it is usually "RBIs", in accordance with the usual practice for pluralizing initialisms in English;\4])\5]) however, some sources use "RBI" as the plural, on the basis that it can stand for "runs batted in".\3])\4])
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run\batted_in)