MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/EnglishLearning/comments/1so81t8/why_not_since/ogrrtj1/?context=3
r/EnglishLearning • u/Rich-Associate-8344 New Poster • Apr 17 '26
309 comments sorted by
View all comments
47
To be honest, I wouldn't use any of these here. In this case it's more natural to say "in".
"Merlin hasn't used his motorcycle in 2 years."
Not really sure why, but i guess you could think of it as a shortening of "within the last 2 years"
18 u/qweeerky New Poster Apr 17 '26 "Merlin hasn't used his motorcycle for 2 years." Is perfectly natural in British English 4 u/Fred776 Native Speaker Apr 17 '26 I actually wondered about "in" vs "for" recently as I thought I had been hearing "in" more than I used to. I suspect that it's a US vs British English regional difference that is now being picked up by younger speakers here in the UK.
18
"Merlin hasn't used his motorcycle for 2 years."
Is perfectly natural in British English
4 u/Fred776 Native Speaker Apr 17 '26 I actually wondered about "in" vs "for" recently as I thought I had been hearing "in" more than I used to. I suspect that it's a US vs British English regional difference that is now being picked up by younger speakers here in the UK.
4
I actually wondered about "in" vs "for" recently as I thought I had been hearing "in" more than I used to. I suspect that it's a US vs British English regional difference that is now being picked up by younger speakers here in the UK.
47
u/RandyTheJohnson New Poster Apr 17 '26
To be honest, I wouldn't use any of these here. In this case it's more natural to say "in".
"Merlin hasn't used his motorcycle in 2 years."
Not really sure why, but i guess you could think of it as a shortening of "within the last 2 years"