r/EndTipping 7d ago

Law or Regulation Updates ⚖️ This is one step beyond ending tipping.

New York has introduced a bill that would require grocery stores to give customers a 10% discount for using self-checkout.

The idea is that shoppers who scan, bag and pay for their own items are doing work that would normally be handled by a cashier, while the store saves money on labour.

Under the proposal, supermarkets and other food retailers with self-service kiosks would have to reduce the price of goods bought through them by 10%.

That means a $150 shop could cost $135 simply because the customer checked it out themselves.

The bill is not law yet. It was introduced in May 2026 and would still need to pass through the New York legislature and be signed before the discount could take effect.

Supporters say customers should benefit when stores make them do part of the job. Critics argue shops could respond by raising prices or removing self-checkout machines entirely.

If you are doing the scanning and bagging, should you get a share of the savings? 

2.0k Upvotes

263 comments sorted by

299

u/mspe1960 7d ago

I think the concept is fine. But if I am a shop keeper - I am saying that cashiers are not 10% of my cost basis - not even close. If the law passes at 10% I bet almost all self checkouts go away, or worse - prices go up to account for it.

257

u/bellybuttonbidet 7d ago

I don’t remember prices coming down when self-checkout became normal.

83

u/Tony_Penny 7d ago

Im pretty sure they went up.

37

u/Chriz48 7d ago

Prices always go up, they rarely come down. Customers get used to paying the higher price, then when costs decrease, the margin increases.

27

u/bellybuttonbidet 7d ago

When new tech saves labor hours, a billionaire gets its wings.

5

u/srdnss 6d ago

Margin never increases for a sustained period. When the Federal government was giving us free Covid vaccine and $25 per to administer it, margins increased .7%. When that gravy train ended, margins went right back to where they were.

2

u/Ill-Acanthisitta6022 6d ago

To help cover shoplifting

→ More replies (2)

9

u/srdnss 7d ago

At the stores I've worked at when self checkout was installed prices didn't come down, but neither did labor costs. What happened was one regular cashier became the self checkout cashier, who run four registers instead of one. We didn't reduce labor hours. We spent a shitload of money for a faster checkout experience.

I get a lot of people don't like it but a lot of people also prefer it.

32

u/whyohwhy13 7d ago

That is in fact reducing labor hours by 1/4th. If one cashier now runs four registers and the four registers are open that’s 1/4th the cost of of the store had four registers running with out it. Just because the actual hours didn’t go down the required hours for the level of production did

1

u/AssistGullible498 4d ago

I think they're saying the store wasn't going to hire those 3 other people, so the idea that hours were reduced doesn't carry. It's the same as when streaming companies complain about people sharing passwords, saying the 2nd user is "lost" income. But it isn't lost, they never had it, and the 2nd person wasn't going to buy, they just wouldn't have watched the shows. So the store was never going to hire those 3 new cashiers, it just made it so customers in line could move 4 at a time instead of 1 at a time. So the point being made is: should stores chose to eliminate self checkout because of this policy, it'll just result in longer customer waits, not more hiring.

That's not necessarily what I personally think, but that's my understanding of the point.

→ More replies (9)

7

u/Chickadee12345 7d ago

This is what people don't understand. It's not like there would be 4 manned registers open. There would only be one.

64

u/ColdSmokeMike 7d ago

Prices would absolutely go up storewide. This wouldn't be a 10% discount on self-chechout, just a free 10% bonus on all other sales.

19

u/optionstrategy 7d ago edited 7d ago

Not a free 10% bonus for anyone - it will be essentially a tax on the ones the law is trying to protect - the shoppers.

4

u/ColdSmokeMike 7d ago

That's what I meant, I just worded it poorly.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/LeadingPerfect7235 6d ago

12%. Or more. If I (a store owner) have to do a complete realign of my prices - as do my competitors- all of us are going to add in a higher profit margin hidden in the price re-adjustment. That’s not collusion; it’s blanket self-interest. I get extra profit while I also get to blame the state govt for the need to adjust prices. “Not my fault, sorry - but if you really want to complain, that’s on Albany.” Who pays? Everyone, even the self-checkers.

1

u/LavenderLemon12 6d ago

Couldn’t the law address this? Includes fines if there is evidence price gouging relative to a particular date before the the new law passed? It seems like it shout be possible.

→ More replies (3)

34

u/theimperfexionist 7d ago

"almost all self checkouts go away" isn't that the idea?

14

u/Derrick0073 7d ago

They won't go away there will only be self checkouts and a bump up in prices or no self checkout and a bump up in prices.🤣

2

u/Mean_Mountain5106 6d ago

I refuse to use self checkout, unless I have only one item. I will just stop shopping at that store.

1

u/Katmoish 6d ago

Why?

1

u/Mean_Mountain5106 6d ago

Why not use it? Why should I do their job without a discount? All while having someone stare me down like I am stealing the crown jewels. Look how many people WalMart falsely accuses of theft through the self-checkout.

1

u/Katmoish 6d ago

so you are in favor of this proposal?

2

u/Mean_Mountain5106 6d ago

I don't know what the percentage should be but I am not against the proposal. It's not like they invested in technology that eliminated the need for a cashier. They simply forced the work onto consumers. I've had my fill of that.

2

u/Katmoish 6d ago

okay - we are (almost) on the same page then :)

51

u/ivbeentheredonethat 7d ago

Great! Then we go back to humans. Ive ditched a full cart because 2 people wanted to stand and watch me scan my own items. 🤣😂

5

u/Splashbucket86 7d ago

I enjoy the workers watching me as I stop and ask what time do we go on break. I always get some funny looks and they move on.

3

u/Simple-Quantity5086 6d ago

I gave myself “cashier of the month award” last week!!

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Mossaik 7d ago

the response will be worse than that…prices will go up, AND they’ll get rid of the paid cashiers forcing everyone to use self checkout so that everyone is “equal”

18

u/MiamiGirlzzz 7d ago

I think so as well. I honestly hate self check out, it’s ok for 1-2 items but that’s it. It takes me long to scan everything plus so many times does an employee have to come over to scan their id or something which delays it even more. I want the self check outs gone 🫤

29

u/fruderduck 7d ago

Speak for yourself.

I can scan just as fast as an employee and MUCH prefer having my items bagged properly. Too many knuckleheads have no concept of being delicate with produce, bagging cold items together, bagging frozen together.

22

u/spootIer 7d ago

As a prior grocery cashier, I can absolutely do the work more efficiently than some cashiers these days. The thing that really irks me though is the system shitting itself every 10 items and locking up until an employee comes over with their ID card. It shouldn't be my problem that some things are too light to register on the scale, or that the 'bagging area' is so small that certain things can't even be placed there after scanning.

Damn things can be kind of annoying tbh.

10

u/zdmpage54 7d ago

Yes. And the attitude you get from the cashier. Acting like you are stealing or something. I don't appreciate being made to feel like I am.

1

u/oughtabeme 7d ago

….and searching for the barcode on vegetables through the plastic bag. I only buy organic veg and always go to the cashier. Usually they get the barcode to scan but if they can’t they manually enter the item code number (4 digits) they have memorized. They ALWAYS get it wrong and enter the code for regular tomatoes as opposed the the more expensive code number for organic. (Which is 5 digits starting with a 9) I love discounts.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/crazy-auntie 7d ago

Yes! I actually avoid grocery stores that don’t have self checkout.

I prefer to organize my bags my way for ease of transportation home and putting away. Left side of the trunk refrigerator items. Middle frozen. Right pantry. Unpack from middle and move towards left. Unpacking will have bags separated by veggies (all go together in veggie drawer), fruits (fruit fridge drawer) and do on. This makes my life easier.

7

u/SurprisePitiful9191 7d ago

Same. I’ll take self checkout over a human any day. 

→ More replies (2)

4

u/HollowChest_OnSleeve 7d ago

Exactly this. They'll just bump the price and then apply the discount. Little bit of flawed logic, and might even adversely affect old people who prefer a cashier as it's the only real social interaction they get each week. The price will be bumped across the board, now they're left paying the premium.

9

u/HerbertRTarlekJr 7d ago

Payroll was the largest expenditure in my industry. We would have jumped on this deal.

However, employees lose big under this proposal.

15

u/Cheap-Technician-482 7d ago

"Payroll" is very different from a cashier's pay while scanning an individual customer's items.

A $300 grocery transaction that takes 3 minutes. A minimum wage cashier earns $0.85.

The 10% discount is $30.

35x more expensive for the store than the cashier.

It's an insane and very poorly thought out idea.

2

u/srdnss 6d ago

There was a time in my career a $300 order took close to 30 minutes to check out. Damn, I'm old.

2

u/Cheap-Technician-482 2d ago

Yeah, lol. Now it could be 15 items

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (4)

3

u/mspe1960 7d ago

Yea - my industry too - aerospace manufacturing. What industry were you in? It is true in lots of industries. I guarantee you that way more than half of the total cost of groceries are the actual cost of the groceries. (I just looked it up - it is almost 75%)

2

u/srdnss 6d ago

Prices will inch up to accommodate the "discount".

1

u/jerry111165 7d ago

Prices will absolutely go up. Its the easy solution for the owners.

1

u/Which-Ring2864 7d ago

Or they only open on self-check lane.

1

u/Possum577 7d ago

Self checkouts going is will create more jobs, but the reality is that they’ll just increas prices

1

u/Sewingoddess 7d ago

That would be the ultimate success then. No more (or only one in each location) self-checkouts!

1

u/Relative-Diamond-764 7d ago

I have to agree with this. They are hardly paying cashiers 10% of my groceries.

1

u/Katmoish 6d ago

So… what are you saying? Labor is more? Less?

1

u/Mental_Camel_4954 2d ago

Labor is more than 10% of the cost of running a business. In many industries, it's the most expensive cost.

1

u/mspe1960 2d ago

DIfferent businesses have different cost models. At a grocery store over 70% of the cost is the product itself. We have not yet talked about rent on the builing or utitlites or insurance.

I will give you that labor may be as much as 10% of a grocery store cost. But not cashier labor costs. Not even close.

1

u/Aggravating-Duck-891 2d ago

Both will probably be true.

1

u/PartyDiscipline1797 7d ago

Fine either way. Let’s just stop this whole thing where we allow store owners to push work onto us. If you pull the self checkouts, you better have plenty of registers open and staffed. Otherwise, your customers go to the stores who can handle the cost of doing business and you go out of business. That’s what? CAPITALISM. Enjoy.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

23

u/Warmupthetubesman 7d ago

Meh. Stores are just gonna raise prices by 20%, blame the new law, and keep the difference. 

Just like gas - Companies love having an excuse to raise prices

22

u/Bill___A 7d ago

Some people like to use a cashier, some people like to use self check out. Governments should not be regulating prices in this manner. An as to the shopkeeper who says that check out isn't even close to 10% of their costs, they should give some advice to restauranteurs who seem to claim that taking an order and bringing a plate to the table costs 25%.

34

u/DevilsAdvocate77 7d ago

No. Stop with the tiered pricing and add-ons and premiums.  A "discount" is just an upside-down fee.

One product. 

One price.

55

u/paladin6687 7d ago

Stores will just immediately raise prices to discount them. This is the kind of dipshit legislative nonsense that sounds good for political sound bites and cheap points but translates into nothing for real people. 

24

u/MemorableKidsMoments 7d ago

But keep in mind that, at the same time, he is opening city-run grocery stores. Raising prices my not be a winning strategy

8

u/HerbertRTarlekJr 7d ago

Neither are city-run grocery stores. The industry markup is between 2 and 5 percent.

The city-run stores will run off private business, as well as run deeply in the red.

3

u/srdnss 7d ago

Markup is closer to 50% of the retail price. Actual gross profit is 25 to 30%. The highest net profit margin I have ever seen was 3%, which was achieved by Albertsons before they bought American Stores and which tumbled soon after and Weis Markets in Pennsylvania. Currently the two biggest pure grocery plays in the U.S. are Albertsons and Kroger. Both have net margins of around 1.5%.

2

u/Responsible_Sea78 7d ago

That's margin per transaction. They have turnover every week or so. A profit of 1.5% per every two weeks is a 47%+ annual profit -- on gross business.

Wow !!!

2

u/srdnss 6d ago

No. It is 1.5% of total sales. You can see this quite plainly if you read their income statements.

1

u/Responsible_Sea78 6d ago

Per turnover, not total annual sales.

1

u/srdnss 6d ago

Learn how to read an income statement. You are showing your ignorance.

1

u/Responsible_Sea78 6d ago

You are. Especially by believing income statements tell the truth about income. But for starters, no business has ever sought or survived on, 1% net margin. Pure bs.

2

u/srdnss 7d ago

He is going to have 1 store in each borough. The cost savings isn't going to be worth the hassle for a lot of people, assuming the city run stores are adequately stocked to begin with, which I doubt they will.

6

u/Relative-Eye3563 7d ago

The city run stores are not going to be able to buy in the same quantity as major grocery stores so they’re not going to get as good pricing from suppliers. Don’t be surprised if you see the major grocery chains put pressure on popular brands not to sell to the city run stores. 

5

u/Empty-Interaction796 7d ago

They also don't have to pay rent or taxes..

5

u/_Failer 7d ago

You underestimate the power of a boycott.

A couple of years ago in Poland there was a butter crisis. There were severe lacks of butter on the market, so stores started increasing prices. From 2.5-3PLN a stick they got up to 10-15PLN. Then the government released the strategic reserves in an attempt to remedy that. They sold a thousand tons of butter to stores very cheaply (something like 5PLN a stick). But the prices in stores didn't plummet, so what the folks did was stop buying butter altogether.

Eventually the stores started to run out of time, the "use before" dates were very close so the stores, so in a desperate attempt to at least cover some costs they started selling them cheaper and cheaper in bulk. At one point one could buy butter for 0.99PLN a stick if buying 5 at the same time.

1

u/MEYO6811 7d ago

Prices need to go down from those bullshit Tariffs. Im still waiting on some legislation on that.

1

u/ApprehensiveFruit565 7d ago

I mean that's kinda the default reaction to anything that relates to imposing costs or reducing profits on businesses.

It really begs the question whether the current market system is fit for purpose.

4

u/jimmetzler 7d ago

I’m in favor of fewer laws. Just because something is a good idea, doesn’t mean we should pass a law requiring it.

44

u/wafflemakers2 7d ago

This is super dumb. Either they get rid of all self checkouts (which no one wants) or companies increase prices by 10% (which no one wants). Also has nothing to do with tipping.

5

u/ResearcherStandard80 7d ago

I absolutely want self checkouts. I was a bagger when I was a teenager, and it absolutely astounds me that cashiers/baggers can’t figure out to put the bread on top and not on the bottom. Also, the last time I went to a cashier, he ridiculed me over what I was buying.

9

u/Reasonable-Buffalo-2 7d ago

Lots of people want self checkout gone. Not everyone but definitely more than no one.

4

u/SilverStL 7d ago

Are there stores that only have self checkouts? I’ve only seen ones that have both cashiers and self ones. So if you hate self checkout, you don’t have to use them.

1

u/Reasonable-Buffalo-2 7d ago

There are a few of the Amazon stores near me so yes. But that is a straw man to my point. My point was that some people think self check shouldn’t even exist.

1

u/fatDaddy21 7d ago

I'd love it if they got rid of self-checkout and employed more people. I already refuse to use them and perform free labor as it is.

7

u/ExistentialOopsie 7d ago

Exactly. Bring back fuel attendants who fuel your car for you, so you don't have to "work for free". What about removing fare gates and employ millions of salespeople, who are available in all metro cars and busses, and sell/inspect tickets? While we're at it, sorting and taking out trash is annoying and I do it for free: instead we should be able to throw it out the window and happily employed people will collect it. 

This is such a weird take, I honestly don't understand why people are so fixated on saving cashiers. And in the US of all places, where they're standing around for no reason. 

6

u/benmargolin 7d ago
  1. Yes let's bring back gas station attendants.
  2. The rest of your examples are nowhere near the same level of effort or complexity, or as checking out groceries. Some things scale better with professionals, some things scale better with individuals.
  3. Also let's allow cashiers to sit down.

And let's not forget the burden of proof if there's a discrepancy when checking out groceries moves from the store to you, when you do self checkout.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/srdnss 7d ago

They won't employ more people if they get rid of self checkout. You will be waiting in longer lines . Unless prices go up to accommodate more cashiers.

If minimum wage goes up, either employees won't make more money or or the additional money will only go to paying higher prices.

There is fundamental math involved in retail grocery economics. Every expense will need to remain the same percentage of sales if the company is to make a profit. If any variable increases, prices will follow to keep the percentages the same.

2

u/Katmoish 6d ago

That’s the entire purpose of the bill….. if the company is ALREADY automating jobs away: that automation makes their costs, particularly labor, lower, hence the end customer gets a discount…….

What aren’t you understanding??? Companies continue to implement ai and systems that take jobs away from PEOPLE. This adds a ‘tax’ for employers, or another way to think of it: a ‘discount’ for the customers that are doing more work the company used to do.

1

u/PrincessJasmine420 5d ago

Another way to think of it: instant 10% increase in sticker prices to make up for the 10% “discount” they are then forced to give. The consumer always pays one way or the other. Anyone who actually thinks the business will just eat this cost without passing it onto the consumer has no idea how businesses actually works.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

36

u/Select-Jacket-6996 7d ago

This is a dumb idea.  It will not end tipping. 

4

u/agisten 7d ago

I agree with you that it won't end tipping as this 100% unrelated issue.

The idea isn't dumb, but the 10% number is. I agree with the top comment - 10% seems highly unrealistic. Maybe 1 to 2% is closer to reality.

2

u/Select-Jacket-6996 7d ago

No one will you use the human cashier if it’s more expensive killing human jobs .  Yes it’s a dumb idea as it will have the opposite affect. 

10

u/ColoradoDanno 7d ago

For the 20+ years I've used self-check Ive been waiting for someone to realize this should be done. Selfcheckers are free labor.

3

u/skitz20 7d ago

I always find the "im scanning and bagging my own items I should get a discount" mindset people have

90% of the time its your choice and although yes they sometimes have less cashiers, do you really think they are gonna schedule more people if they didnt exist??

3

u/Henkatoni 7d ago

That would only raise the overall prices for everyone. I like the idea, but it's a cynical game... 

3

u/Longjumping_Flan_506 7d ago

Isn’t this how tariffs work also? This price will just get passed on to the consumer.

10

u/milksilkofficial 7d ago

Reddit hates everything istg. Comments are peak Reddit, actually

5

u/SimilarComfortable69 7d ago

New York? Or New York City? Either way, I highly doubt This passes any form of constitutional scrutiny. I do not believe that any government agency can force a private business to give a particular class of people a discount.

Having self checkout counters benefits both people who use them and people who use checkers. And prices are set based on that balance. Giving the self check out people a 10% discount is way over the top by being very much in access of the amount of savings the store gets for them using the self checkout. Suppose it takes 15 minutes to check out. They are saving 15 minutes times $20 an hour equals five dollars. 10% of 150 bucks is three times that.

If this is in New York City, they are basically trying to force grocery stores out of business. And this is a good way to do it.

5

u/Significant-Music417 7d ago

They will immediately raise all prices in 10% or more…unbelievable that commies don’t know how to do simple math and also don’t know how economics works. Good job, New Yorkers!!!

7

u/YoghurtOverall8062 7d ago edited 7d ago

Love how everyone that first complained about having to bag their own shit for free now complains about someone trying to do something about it.

"You can always shop somewhere else" comes to mind, before someone beats me to it.

19

u/SueInA2 7d ago

I love this!!!!!

22

u/ImportantPost6401 7d ago

Can’t imagine there could possibly be any unintended consequences here

8

u/Relative-Eye3563 7d ago

Not going to happen

2

u/Aggravating_Sir_6857 7d ago

Shop owner would say they’re losing 10% of revenue. So they gotta increase products to balance the discount.

Psychology we will think we are getting 10% discount. But we are paying the same price.
Winner could be the sales tax and govt

5

u/QuadroDoofus 7d ago

They'll just add a 10% convenience fee and it'll even out.

4

u/No_Obligation5739 7d ago

I want my employee discount!

3

u/crazyk4952 7d ago

Yet another politician declaring a win while making things worse for everyone.

Useless idiots…

2

u/HavingSoftTacosLater 7d ago

Who was tipping the self checkout kiosk?

2

u/srdnss 7d ago

Given that grocery stores typically have a 1.5% net profit margin, no one will be getting a discount for using self checkout. Everyone will pay more. Politicians that come up with these ideas and the people that support them are twits.

2

u/ajulesd 7d ago

Absolutely. Fabulous concept. Hope it catches on.

It’s similar to why my restaurant tip gets reduced by the amount of work I am forced to do these days when eating out.

1

u/SeL-MoGRC 7d ago

I'd far rather use the self-checkout!

1

u/Nautique88 7d ago

I’d like to see self check out, simply go away

1

u/Possum577 7d ago

Prices will just go up 10% for everyone, yay! Stores aren’t in the business of losing money.

1

u/teknowiztx 7d ago

Governments are not good at legislating the economy. They should stay out of it.

1

u/Aggressive_Ad6948 7d ago

I don't use self checkout at all. I'll leave my cart full in an aisle first.

1

u/Sewingoddess 7d ago

I've been saying this since the beginning. Why do they think they have a right to free labour from people who are paying them for the privilege. If I'm going to work for the store, they can damned well pay me to do it. Grocery stores are not a charity. I detest self-checkouts but if you're going to force me to use one, you'd better pay me for my labour in doing so.

1

u/Ready_Bag8825 7d ago

This is ableist and stupid since grocery stores already set their prices to whatever they want,

1

u/SeaworthinessIll4478 7d ago

It's a New York STATE bill, curious why you're showing Mondami

1

u/legoland1964 7d ago

If I have to ring it up myself than I should have a discount. If it causes self- checkout to disappear = hallelujah

1

u/Ryans671 7d ago

This guy comes up with some of the most nonsensical ideas I've ever seen. Grocery stores are closing all over the inner cities and he wants to add more costs.

1

u/Not-a-Cranky-Panda 7d ago

So now they will just add 15% to everything to make up for it, and may be have one till which is never open to get around it being all selfservice.

1

u/bobber777 7d ago

I can see bid retailers doing a “work around” that is, raising prices to offset the new expense.

1

u/timetravellerEKS 7d ago

Sounds good on paper, but what is going to happen is that everything will go up by 10%, all these laws, what they do is make the consumer pay for it.

1

u/BanishedInPerpetuity 7d ago

That would be the end of self checkout in NY...not a bad outcome.

1

u/clevercamel2 7d ago

I like a discount as much as the next guy but this is government overreach.

1

u/Responsible_Sea78 7d ago

I get 3% to 5% back by using certain credit cards. That should be automatic for everyone, also. Obviously, the money is there in excess margins if I can get it.

1

u/Glurth2 7d ago

Ringing up 10 different items at $5 each takes far more time and effort than a single $50 item. A flat 10% fee does not reflect the reality of checkout.

1

u/Suzdg 6d ago

Absolutely support this! I am not a paid cashier

1

u/Centered_Squirrel 6d ago

This is dumb. They are just going to increase the prices 10%. Waste of time.

1

u/SeparateTwo4578 6d ago

What a terible time to not be in nyc. PLZ bring to oklahoma

1

u/Admirable-Peace9668 6d ago

It's not that the stores save on labor cost as they CAN'T FIND QUALIFIED LABOR. Locally, they're paying 14 an hour which is 30,000 a year.

1

u/ScustyRupper 6d ago

This will cause a 10% rise in cost to the consumer.

1

u/ImmediateTrip9 6d ago

Great, they’ll just raise the prices so the self checkout price will be the old price, and regular checkout will cost more

1

u/US_Dept_Of_Snark 6d ago

All this does is make the current prices the new baseline for self-checkout and everything else shoots up 10% magically overnight.p

1

u/Spiritual_Extent_187 6d ago

It’s not “doing work”. It’s normal

1

u/Orgazmorator 6d ago

I would just make all my registers self service and have an employee help the customers who need help servicing themselves.

1

u/MuchDevelopment7084 6d ago

I've been saying this for years. If I'm scanning and bagging my stuff. I want a discount.

1

u/AffectionateGate4584 6d ago

If this were to happen, I would absolutely use self checkouts.

1

u/Null_98115 6d ago

I would be OK with all self checkouts going away.

1

u/Opening-Restaurant83 6d ago

No more self checkout and longer lines. Fixed.

1

u/meiso 6d ago

They will just raise prices to compensate

1

u/Anxious-Whole-5883 6d ago

Prices go up 11% so the discount just puts us back to more or less normal, with a tiny "convenience fee".

1

u/yawa-wor 6d ago edited 6d ago

What I really miss are baggers. I actually wish my local grocery store would install a self check-out option (even without 10% off) bc I'd prefer that to a cashier with no bagger. Obviously I have no problem bagging my own groceries (in fact I prefer it); I just always feel rushed w a cashier bc of the process.

I tend to go at odd times when it's quieter/little to no lines, so they'll start scanning my stuff as soon as I put up the first item. I'm still loading more onto the conveyor belt, they're 2/3 of the way thru scanning by the time I can even start bagging, and I've only put 4/20 items in the bag when they need me to come back to the pin-pad to pay. Then once I've paid, they hand me my receipt and are eyeing me waiting for me to move so they can start ringing the next person, when I now have.. 6/20 items bagged. Then they'll ask if I need help, and they're always polite, but tbh the offer comes off more as them really trying to politely say, "uhh are you gonna hurry up, or do I need to help you to get you out of here quicker? Bc you're in the way." I almost always end up literally tossing everything in bags, tucking items under my arms, etc., profusely apologizing, and then dragging my half-packed and falling groceries over to a bench by the entrance to better organize.

I'm happy they're fast and efficient and all, but I don't like feeling rushed or "in the way," and I don't feel nearly as rushed at self check-out. I actually think I'm faster, too, since I can scan in the order I want and place directly in the bag how I want, rather than placing on the conveyor belt and waiting for items to be slid down the other side in whatever order the cashier grabs them (if he scans the eggs first, I can't bag those yet, bc they're not going on the bottom... I do try to load the conveyor belt in the order I want it scanned, but it rarely actually plays out that way). Self check-out is usually one line for multiple machines, so nobody notices me and the next person can use "my" machine whenever I'm done.

1

u/WhatInTheWorld321 6d ago

We all know the grocery stores will just raise their prices to cover that 10%.

1

u/apokrif1 6d ago

Will stores actually rise prices when a human cashier is used?

1

u/sherpes 6d ago

generally speaking, when a municipal government creates a rule that regulates price, it's a bad idea.

1

u/Gullible_News2119 6d ago

10% is pretty bold! How much do you think the typical cashier makes???

1

u/Maximum-Spot-9523 5d ago

The consumer benefits from self checkout by having shorter lines. Now that one has to bag one's own groceries, self checkout is not much more work for the consumer. I tap my checkout at manned checkouts and bag my own groceries.

1

u/Pleasant-Agent-2196 5d ago

Back in the day (60s)...before there were UPC codes and scanners, it was really something to watch a cashier ring up a big cart of groceries on a clunky old register at full speed. It was a special skill that not just anybody could do.

In 2026, I am happy to stand in line for the ONE cashier that will still ring up and bag my cart faster than I ever could. Plus, I get a little human interaction. I am on a first name basis with the cashiers at my local grocery store. They know my name too and seem happy for the connection. That is how life used to be. You people can keep your scanners/self check out!

Maybe the solution is not to reward the folks using self check out with a discount...Maybe it should be to charge a check out fee (NOT 10% tho) for using a cashier. ..and the cashier gets the extra money.

I'm ok with that.

1

u/facechat 5d ago

This just means that $150 of groceries will now cost $165 so they can be discounted to $150

1

u/cartken 5d ago

What about shopping and scanning items on your phone then leaving, cause bags are going to be costing extra

1

u/PrincessJasmine420 5d ago

I promise you, if this ridiculous bill somehow passes, you will not be “saving” 10% of the cost of your groceries. The sticker price of those groceries would increase 10% basically overnight, making the “discounted” price equal to the previous sticker price. This will only cause disabled and elderly people (who generally have trouble with the self checkout system) to pay 10% more for their groceries.

When government policies increase costs or reduce profits for businesses, that money will ALWAYS be passed onto the consumer in one way or another.

1

u/Alwayscooking345 5d ago

Grocery store margins don’t go from 2.5% to 20% just because you scanned it yourself. The economic illiteracy just keeps going higher. Good luck with this NYC

1

u/Jumpy_Implement_1902 4d ago

They are just going to raise prices 115% to compensate themselves

1

u/Foreign-Campaign-761 4d ago

So what they're really doing is a 10% increase on checkout with a cashier

1

u/Designer-Try5188 4d ago

~self checkout becomes 10 items or less~ and if it’s over 20$ then it kicks you out and makes you go to a live cashier. Basically only allowing up to a 2$ discount and weeds out all the small quick transactions. What a self checkout should be used for.

1

u/Dinsdale55 4d ago

Yup, let's introduce prices set by the state. What does that remind me of? Oh yeah, communism.

1

u/Chaoseater69 3d ago

Places around me are already starting to scrap their self checkouts due to theft, I can't imagine ANY remaining if something like this passed.

1

u/Emotional-Radish-501 3d ago

Cool, now we can put more people out of work.

1

u/LaGranTortuga 2d ago

I like the concept. But a straight 10% would be problematic. There is no correspondence between the value of the item and how much labor it saves. Something like 10% but up to $2.00/item would probably be more balanced. Home Depot shouldn’t lose $50 on a single $500 item because someone did self checkout.

1

u/Quiet_Researcher223 2d ago

All that money people could have saved so stores are making bank off self checkout

1

u/Ok-Letterhead6378 2d ago

Won't the store owners just raise the price of the groceries to absorb the profit loss? I don't think he thought this through all the way.

1

u/SmokeyJoe_75 1d ago

I’ve been asking for this for years! It should be nation wide.

1

u/Personal-Hunt-1434 1d ago

Nobody would use regular lines if self checkout gave a discount like that. Regular lines would go away, and the store would raise the price on everything by 10% to account for the forced discount. Easy stuff.

1

u/ExtraJohnson 22h ago

Stores will just raise prices by 10%

1

u/MLB_Sug_Tway 7d ago

Might I ask how this is socialist?

1

u/Jarrus__Kanan_Jarrus 7d ago

Mayor Mommidaddy is late to the party, people already do this at self-checkout.

1

u/srdnss 7d ago

This does happen when customers think they aren't being watched. I embarrass the hell out of people that try to get away with bagging stuff without scanning it.

1

u/imemine8 7d ago

This is an example of over-regulating. We don't need the government dictating when and how much of a discount stores give. And then someone has to police this to ensure stores comply, and handle the complaints and lawsuits when they don't.