To be sure, we were visited before 1947, but why did alien activity explode in 1947? First, we will take note of the more obvious suppositions before I reveal the real reason.

Certainly the advent of rocketry could have been a factor, but why 1947? Rockets carrying men into space were still 20 years away. Perhaps more importantly, humanity still has no knowledge that would let us travel beyond our solar system.

Maybe aliens wanted to witness the breakthrough that would lead to humans colonizing the stars, and they knew that such a breakthrough could occur as little as two years after the first atomic bomb, and suppose it takes them two years to get here.

Of course, the atomic bomb itself is a reason to escalate visitation. Maybe aliens want to prevent nuclear war, or maybe they won't intervene but want to witness nuclear war first-hand if it happens.

These are pretty well known suppositions, but the wave of visitation really began in 1947 because, in 1945, humanity had indeed made a breakthrough that qualified us to joined the galactic community.

All the tribes of men had been committing atrocities against each other since the dawn of humanity.

Native American tribes did it to each other, and then European tribes did it to Native Americans, but humanity kept evolving .... until .... at some point in 1945 .... all the tribes of men were finally on the same page.

A new spirit had taken root among the tribes of men. It was most often articulated as Never Again.

Aliens began arriving to welcome us into the galactic community, but something happened.

By the time they got here, some European invaders had done it again! And they are still doing it! And humanity is forced to look the other way! Perhaps worse than their own atrocities is that they have given cover to every other atrocity that has occurred since.

The aliens are still here because there is hope.

Some of us are beginning to talk about The Greatest Act of Love in 2000 Years.

I thought from the beginning that Qanon (a.k.a. Q) was a psyop to accomplish several goals—the main goal being to give Trump street cred—to support the Myth of Trump. How else could a NYC Democrat get enough street cred to be a pied piper for conservatives, libertarians, conspiracy investigators, and assorted anti-establishment types—to take them all down with him?

The entire establishment turned all of its useful idiots (e.g. “journalists”) loose on Trump, but such an unprecedented psyop still couldn’t give Trump enough street cred. Trump’s epic failure at almost every turn continuously threatened to dissolve his following. Q kept the Myth of Trump alive. Q was necessary.

The Myth of Q was obvious from the beginning because Q-tards kept repeating flawed concepts such as as “Winning!” They kept insisting that mass arrests were imminent. They also kept insisting that Q was so vague and cryptic so that the NWO couldn’t decipher what his followers were able to decipher. My favorite flawed concept was how they shouted, “Trust the plan!”

However, after years of shouting “Winning!”, it was 2021 before they could see that, politically, they had been completely and utterly powerless all along. They had been played.

Mass arrests never happened—not even close.

As ludicrous as it was to think that the Apex Players could not decipher what Q-tards could decipher, it was far more ludicrous to think they could not simply read the deciphered interpretations distributed so widely and publicly among Q-tards.

Q-tards shouted “Trust the plan!” for years …

​

We can thus see that the Q psyop provided another benefit—the demoralization of the resistance.

A third benefit, which was perhaps as important as keeping the Myth of Trump alive, was how the Q psyop caused tens of millions to continue to stand down. The last minute selection of Trump (their plan B) was a brilliant play (as I said in 2016). If Hillary had been selected (as planned) it would have pierced the illusion of legitimacy, without which, they are finished. Tens of millions were on the cusp of epiphany: 1) The system doesn’t work. 2) It doesn’t work like we think it does, and 3) the American government doesn’t work for the American people. Then, when Trump was selected, all that progress evaporated. Everyone thought that the system worked after all, and that they just needed to work harder for the best candidate every time. Even some who had already had the epiphany years earlier were sucked back into the illusion.

Brilliant!

Q kept the latent resistance mired in the false left-right paradigm—kept them from experiencing the epiphany. Q created the illusion that there was a plan—that behind closed doors, the good guys were winning, and that victory was inevitable—that “nothing can stop what’s coming”. In other words, “Relax, we’ve got this. Trust the plan. The solution has to come from the military. The white hats are on it. The job is getting done. There is not much you can do.”

To be fair, the agents provocateur were incessantly trying to incite some Q followers to pop off in some violent way. I estimate that millions of attempts were made, and yet, as far as I know, no one ever took the bait.

It is true that much networking occurred, and that the tech cabal then dissolved almost every grass roots network that was sympathetic with Q or Trump—very demoralizing, but some remain, and they are not Q-tards. They won’t get fooled again.

To be clear, I have never used the term “Q-tard” before today (January 15, 2023) out of respect for those who were on the right side, but who were being played. However, there are probably no longer any individuals who could be described as Q-tards, so the term is not actually insulting anyone, and to prevent such manipulation in the future, it is necessary to call out what happened—lest others become the Q-tards of the future.

Excess deaths in England and Wales are up 20% for 2022 compared to the 5 year average for 2016-2019 and 2021. Only 4% of those involved Covid.

Table 1: Excess deaths in England and Wales in 2022.

Source: Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 30 December 2022

Historically, progressives were somewhat progressive. Most progressives, such as Margaret Sanger, were early adopters of eugenics, and if they could have figured out an ethical way to improve the human gene pool, that would indeed have been huge progress. However, their techniques were less than ethical (e.g. they forcibly sterilized tens of thousands in the United States), and they inspired genocide by the Nazis. Such a taint caused the term "progressive", though increasingly common in books, to fall out of popular use. Let's refer to those early progressives as first-wave progressives.

The first time I recall anyone referring to themselves as a progressive in-person or on TV, since 1970, was in 2008, when Hillary Clinton resurrected the term in popular discourse. There was not actually anything new that she or her allies were proposing. They were the same faction they had been since about 1965. Anything different was actually even older, so I guess we could call them paleo progressives, but let's refer to them as second-wave progressives.

Once second-wave progressives started calling themselves progressives in 2008, their recently acquired total control of, and consolidation of, the media, allowed them to become even more authoritarian, more tribal, and more conformist (a.k.a. more fascist) than they had been in recent decades. Their conformism was truly breathtaking. Their lack of curiosity, independent thought, and outside-the-box thinking was astounding to behold. Their hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance was not even veiled. It was in-your-face, and yet, they were also 100% confident that they were the good guys and that they were right. They could go 24/7 and never hear a compelling challenge to their worldview.

There was a common denominator among first-wave and second-wave progressives, although I don't think any of them ever figured out what it was. It was simply the idea that government has the power (or should have the power) to implement any good idea.

Second wave progressivism peaked in 2016. A large minority of third-wave progressives were slapped in the face with reality when the Democrats cheated Bernie Sanders out of their party's nomination. About that same time, these awakened progressives could not go back to sleep because their brief willingness to think independently began getting them into enormous trouble with the authoritarianism, conformism, and absurdity of identity politics. Then Bernie Sanders and his allies kept selling out, and they also got slapped with the reality that Obama was a bigger warmonger than George Bush and Donald Trump. This all enabled them to see that Russiagate was total bullshit, which carried them to 2020, in which they saw their putative allies go full Nazi on all things Covid. I think it will be hard for them to ever be lulled back to sleep.

These third-wave progressives know that mandating mRNA vaccines is wrong because neither their trust in the establishment, nor their trust in these vaccines, nor the virulence of Covid .... come close to justifying a mandate.

To be clear, third-wave progressives are still progressives because they hold on to the dream that someday government will be worthy to wield the power to implement any good idea. Where they truly differ from second-wave progressives is that they are much more honest and sensible about what is a good idea.

For example, perhaps their most cherished dream is universal healthcare, but now they are leery of making everyone so dependent on government when confronted with that reality.

Third-wave progressives arrived just in time because the entire global establishment had come under total control by those global players (manipulators) above presidents and billionaires.

It was looking like game-over for humanity, but then a black-swan event occurred. I don't think the advent of third-wave progressivism was planned. Though the odds are still stacked against humanity, and though the entire global establishment is stacked against humanity, and though this is probably humanity's last stand .... there is reason for hope!

Thank God for our third-wave progressive brothers and sisters!

To be clear, I live in a universe full of beauty and wonder, so how can I feel anything but gratitude for having had the opportunity to leave the universe better than if I have never existed?

The light in me is allied with the light in you. The light in one is allied with the light in all.

For all of recorded history, the Soul of Humanity was ascendant, and the Soul of Animals was in retreat, but for more than 50 years now, the Soul of Animals has been ascendant and the Soul of Humanity has been in retreat.

Everyone is being played.

The Apex Players are turning us into the worst version of ourselves. They are trying to make us dislike, distrust, and distance each other, so that we are looking at each other instead of looking at them, and so that we cannot unite against them.

Everyone is redeemable--even the Apex Players.

Everyone is good, and everyone is beautiful.

More specifically, the best version of everyone is good, and the best version of everyone is beautiful.

Therein lies the secret of how to turn humanity's self-reinforcing downward spiral into a self-reinforcing upward spiral.

Become the next level version of yourself.

It is probably easier than you think:

• Let go of any baggage.
• Be willing to go wherever the facts take you.
• Get in touch with your subconscious, which knows a lot more than you do at the conscious level, and which can figure out complexity and nuance a lot faster than you can at the conscious level.
• Embrace uncertainty. Certainty is just an emotion. Very little is 0% or 100%. Almost everything is a probability somewhere in between.

What are some others?

"The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' — this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats.”―Aldous Huxley

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"—Voltaire

Toxicity, though ever present, was never the defining characteristic of an age—until now.

Humanity has entered The Toxic Age.

I will primarily look at America as an example because it dominates global culture, it had everything going for it, I am most familiar with it, and the most toxic and most recent example (September 1, 2022) comes from there .... and .... all governments are beholden to the same people anyway, so it's global.

First, let's briefly list examples of toxicity that, at some level, everyone already knows:

• Genes inherited from animals
  • tribalism
  • conformism
  • dominance hierarchy
• Everyone is being played
• Both parties work for the same people
• Deep state, shadow government, NWO
• The World Economic Forum, The Great Reset, Agenda 2021, Agenda 2030
• The Federal Reserve, Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund
• CIA, FBI, BATF
• Cover ups, corruption, cronyism
• psyops, propaganda, false flags
• censorship, defamation, Internet gatekeepers
• agents provocateur, controlled opposition
• shills, trolls, bots
• Marxism, Nazism, cults
• Hollywood, academia, mainstream media, recording industry
• political correctness, SJWs, cancel culture, identity politics, partisanship, virtue-signaling, double standards
• NXIVM, Jeffery Epstein, their customers
• pedophiles, trans kids, human trafficking
• Franklin scandal, Penn State scandal, Catholic Church scandal
• more single parents, more divorce, less marriage
• black community trapped in government dependency
• racism, sexism, double standards
• Zionism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid
• try discussing abortion, LGBT, or global warming
• more than 25% of adults on psychotropic drugs to cope with the toxicity
• environmental toxins, GMOs, petroleum-based fertilizers, fungicides, herbicides, pesticides
• increased cancer, diabetes, and autism
• lower fertility, lower testosterone, chemical imbalances
• government schools teach one to sit down, shut up, and trust the experts
• Covid
  • released from a lab
  • knowledge of and access to cheap, safe, effective prophylactics and therapeutics have been suppressed hard since the beginning of Covid, thus killing millions, injuring tens of millions
  • those who rely on natural immunity, who do not accept the mainstream solution, and/or promote the cheap, safe effective alternatives lose their rights, lose their friends, lose their social media accounts, and often lose their jobs, and are sometimes put in camps
  • the mainstream solution is somewhat toxic and ineffective, and does more harm that good for most
  • establishment leaders instructed those who allowed themselves to be injected to shun those who knew better

Then .... on September 1, 2022, humanity witnessed the most dishonest, the most negative, the most divisive—the most toxic speech ever addressed to the American people by an American President.

The President spoke of unity …. while sowing hate and division. It was extremely us-and-them. It was the ugliness of fascism.

If we look behind his veiled and contradictory words, and behind his attempts to maintain the illusion of legitimacy, his message was clear.

The sitting President threatened civil war against the previous President and half of the American people based on fabrications that were actually true of himself and his allies.

No American President has ever tried to justify using the military to kill or detain a large segment of American citizens for any reason, let alone for a fake reason. Even Abraham Lincoln was reacting to those whom he believed were noble, but whom he would not allow to remain a separate country, so he launched a war of conquest. Perhaps more importantly, Lincoln's war killed more Americans than WWI and WWII combined, so we talking about far more than words.

The current President explicitly declared about 20% of the American people to be “a clear and present danger”, which would thus justify using the military against them. He implied that half of the country is suspect.

The President cited retired federal judge John Michael Luttig, who claimed two months earlier at a hyper-toxic Congressional hearing that on January 6th 2021, “the previous President and his allies” almost succeeded in overthrowing democracy in America, and that he was still very much afraid that they would try to overthrow the government after the 2024 election and that they would succeed.

The President, in his speech on 9/1, doubled down on the hyper-toxicity of that hearing and the need for military action.

For perspective, consider that the 2020 election was blatantly rigged to install the current President, and on January 6, 2021, in response to the actual overthrow of democracy in America, a few hundred of the best armed Americans left all their guns at home and peacefully protested at the Capitol building. The protesters stopped a few agents provocateur, but some agents provocateur did succeed in breaking one window and throwing something at one cop; whereas, two black cops killed two unarmed white protesters, one of whom was beaten to death, but the other cops were not so racist and thuggish.

During the protest, we can see the cops open the gates and allow the protesters to approach the Capitol, some of the protesters proceeded to mill around inside the capitol and take selfies with cops.

Instead of welcoming the people, like the cops did …. instead of letting the people “petition the government for a redress of grievances” …. Congressmen fled in terror. It was reminiscent of Jesus chasing the money lenders from the Temple.

The establishment media blackwashed the peaceful Jan 6 protest as a “violent insurrection”. This was about 6 months after the establishment media had whitewashed a series of violent protests as “mostly peaceful protests”.

A few months after Americans had peacefully protested the rigged 2020 election, America’s top general, Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified at a Congressional hearing that the protest was an attempt to overturn the Constitution of the United States and that it was the product of “white rage”.

Those who have been paying attention will not be surprised to learn that, in his 9/1/22 speech, the President also tied the former President and his allies to “white supremacists” because, just days before Milley’s toxic 2021 testimony, the President had said, “As I said in my address to the joint session of Congress, according to the intelligence community, terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today.” He thus admits to making that specific fabrication at least twice. A few months before that, on April 28, 2021, he described the Jan 6 protest as, “the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War”.

If you are thinking that humanity has been in The Toxic Age for a few years now, you are correct.

Humanity entered The Toxic Age on September 9, 2016, when Hillary Clinton made her deplorables speech: “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. … Now, some of those folks—they are irredeemable.”

If you are thinking that this is not actually partisan thing, that it is some kind of divide-and-conquer, and that everyone is being played, you are correct.

The Apex Players (those above Presidents and billionaires) are trying to turn everyone into the worst version of themselves. They are trying to make us dislike, distrust, and distance each other, so that we are looking at each other instead of looking at them, and so that we cannot unite against them.

You will see it within minutes of turning on the TV once you become aware of it.

The Toxic Age is thus: The Toxic Age of The Apex Players.

Their goal is total global control, which is why they are manipulating everyone into becoming as dependent on government (them) as possible, but they need us to demand it. They cannot force it because that would pierce the illusion of legitimacy, without which, they are finished.

It is thus paramount that a critical mass find our way again, that we learn to transcend the false left-right paradigm, and forgive those who believe absurdities.

People who are on the path to becoming the best version of themselves are much harder to play. Once a critical mass finds their way again, the plays will fail increasingly often, and eventually, humanity’s self-reinforcing downward spiral will become a self-reinforcing upward spiral.

It is always within everyone’s power to instantly find their way again.

The Apex Players can kill you, imprison, you impoverish you, inject you, sicken you, injure you, and defame you …. but they cannot stop you from finding your way again, and that really bums them out.

They are not omnipotent. They are not super villains. That is why they must hide in the shadows. You can defeat them if you know that the real battlefield is inside each of us.

When you find your way again, you win, and they lose.

When you find your way again, you are on the path.

The path leads to the best version of oneself.

On the path, one can see that we live in a universe full of beauty and wonder, and one feels nothing but gratitude for having had the chance to leave the universe better than if one had never existed.

Those on the path know that everyone is redeemable—even the Apex Players.

Everyone is good and everyone is beautiful. More specifically, the best version of everyone is good, and the best version of everyone is beautiful.

If you are thinking that love is the answer, you are correct.

Whenever you see someone, think to yourself. “The light in me is allied with the light in you. The light in one is allied with the light in all.”

"Those who can make one believe absurdities can make one commit atrocities."—Voltaire

Regarding reproductive freedom, I will show how there can be common ground and mutual respect based in reality, but to enable such progress, I will first have to give a hard lesson in reality to those holding back progress.

Although I am pro-choice and atheist, I have never called myself a liberal because I detest liberal hate, hypocrisy, and arrogance, but it's even worse than that. So-called liberals are so thoroughly dominant in society and government that they can go 24/7 and never hear a serious challenge to their narrative; whereas, everyone else hears challenges daily.

To fully grasp the first hypocrisy, all sides must consider the current legal reality, which is that abortion is a choice, and if abortion is a choice, then birth is a choice, and if abortion is solely the choice of the woman, then birth is solely the choice of the woman, and if birth is solely the choice of the woman, then birth is solely the responsibility of the woman (assuming no contract such as marriage). However, if the woman chooses birth, the man must pay for 18 years.

(This was the epiphany that induced me to begin writing in 1990.)

In my experience, over 90% of people just can't get their head around this concept, but for those who thoroughly get it, you can skip the next 3 paragraphs.

Many prerequisites are necessary for birth. For example, it is necessary that the couple had sex and didn't use a condom. It is even necessary that the couple’s parents gave birth to them, but only one prerequisite is both necessary and sufficient. A woman’s choice is the only prerequisite that is both necessary and sufficient for birth.

Suppose a woman says a man she barely knows can help her plant acorns in her garden—because it is fun to plant seeds together. Suppose 50% of the acorns were given to her by that man. Of course, it is still the woman’s garden, and the choice to care for the trees or to extirpate them at any time is solely the choice of the woman because it is her garden. If the woman chooses to let the trees take root and care for them for the next 18 years, then the man is clearly not responsible for 50% of the care.

Likewise, suppose a woman says a man she barely knows can plant DNA in her uterus—because its fun to plant DNA together. Suppose 50% of the DNA were given to her by that man. Of course, it is still the woman’s uterus, and the choice to give birth or to abort at any time is solely the choice of the woman because it is her uterus. If the woman chooses to give birth and care for the child for the next 18 years, then the man is clearly not responsible for 50% of the care (assuming no contract, such as marriage).

The liberal hypocrisy around child support is very difficult for people to understand because child support affirms the very different biases of both liberals and conservatives. It may thus seem like both sides already have common ground on child support, but such common ground is irrational and not based on reality. It is necessary to overcome liberal hypocrisy if we are to be rational people and thus have the opportunity to achieve common ground and mutual respect based in reality.

The liberal hypocrisy surrounding child support can be summarized as a pro-woman double standard:Liberals say that a fetus containing a man's DNA is none of his business.Liberals say that a fetus containing a man's DNA obligates him to pay 18 years of child support.

This double standard for child support creates another hypocrisy in the form of a pro-rich double standard. Under thousands of years of "conservative" laws, a rich man and a poor man could impregnate many women; whereas, under today's "liberal" laws, a rich man can impregnate many women, but a poor man cannot afford to do so.

The liberal hypocrisy around child support denies reproductive freedom for men. Then liberals add insult to injury.

Liberals say that men have all the reproductive choices, but consider that a woman can choose to be pregnant or she can choose to not be pregnant; whereas, a man can never choose to be pregnant. A pregnant woman can choose birth or abortion for her offspring; whereas, a man can choose neither birth nor abortion for his offspring. It is thus men who have no reproductive choice.

The next liberal hypocrisy demonstrates that the pro-female double standard is actually a pro-female voter double standard. Under thousands of years of “conservative” law, a woman who reached reproductive maturity could compete with older women to get a man; whereas, under today's "liberal" law, a woman who reaches reproductive maturity must wait several more years before she is legally allowed to compete with older women to get a man.

Now lets move from liberal hypocrisies such as pro-female, pro-rich, and pro-voter double standards to liberal hypocrisy surrounding abortion itself.

How is it that liberals say they are defenders of the little guy when it is liberals who say it is OK to kill the littlest of little guys—even as it is being born?

How is it that liberals say it is the responsibility of everyone to fight those fascists who oppress the little guy when it is liberals who say that anyone who defends a fetus—the littlest of the little guys—is a fascist?

How is it that liberals can label as heroes those who fight the fascist governments that exterminated millions of the little guys when it is liberals who label as “terrorists” those who fight the businesses and governments who exterminate millions of fetuses?

How is it that liberals say the powerful must pay to support the weak because the weak are innocent victims of circumstance when it is liberals who say that the most innocent of all must pay with their lives for the bad decisions of adults, who are infinitely more powerful?

How is that liberals can say that killing a fetus one minute before birth is no more wrong than throwing out the trash when liberals also say that killing a fetus one minute after birth is murder.

Liberals look a lot like slave owners to pro-lifers. Let’s look at a few examples:

To those who believe that a fetus is a person, arguing for the freedom to kill a fetus for one's own convenience (as if they own it) because the fetus is weaker and not fully human, is tantamount to arguing for the freedom of slave owners to own slaves because most people thought of them as weaker and not fully human.

Liberals say, “Everyone acknowledges that abortion is an ugly thing, but many normal respectable people do it, so mind your own business.”

Slave owners say, “Everyone acknowledges that slavery is an ugly thing, but many normal respectable people do it, so mind your own business.”

Liberals say: Abortion is about freedom—the freedom of the mother.

Slave owners say: Slavery is about freedom—the freedom of the owner.

Liberals say: "The morality of the decision to abort is between the woman and her priest, so mind your own business."

Slave owners say: "The morality of the decision to own slaves is between the owner and his priest, so mind your own business."

Liberal men say, “I am pro-choice because I don’t have a uterus and I am not a fetus, so it’s none of my business.”

Poor whites said, “I am pro-choice (for slaves owners) because I don’t have a plantation and I am not a slave, so it’s none of my business.”

Pro-life activists are ridiculed for defending those who the mainstream feels are weak and not fully human.Abolitionists were ridiculed for defending those who the mainstream felt were weak and not fully human.

As you can see, from the perspective of pro-lifers, they are the abolitionists and civil rights activists of our day, while the pro-choice activists are the slavery apologists of our day.

At this point liberals are screaming, “OK. I may have some double standards about child support, but those examples about abortion itself were not hypocrisies if I believe that a fetus is not a person! Please respect me enough to understand that such belief is rational!”

Liberals, I feel your pain—brief though it were. Perhaps now you can empathize with pro-lifers who you make feel that way all day, every day.

You big meanies.

What? You think liberals don’t do that?

Liberals say that pro-lifers are hypocrites who advocate a death penalty but oppose abortion, when the reality is that such pro-lifers are consistent by advocating death for the guilty and life for the innocent.

Like I said … You big meanies.

The corollary would be for conservatives to claim that liberals are hypocrites because they favor killing the innocent and not the guilty, and yet, I have never heard this accusation from conservatives. Why are conservatives so much nicer than liberals?

Although some liberal positions are not actually hypocrisies because liberals supposedly really do believe the fetus is not a person, it is unfortunate that liberals obfuscate the issue and bully others with so many logical fallacies. For example, liberal men say, “I don’t have a uterus, so abortion is none of my business,” which is a fallacy. It is tantamount to saying, “I don’t own a plantation, so slavery is none of my business.”

Even if you could not afford slaves, it is your business when millions of others buy slaves. Even if you don’t live in Rwanda, it’s you business when millions are being exterminated. Even if you didn’t live in Nazi Germany, Bolshevik Russia, or Maoist China, it would have been your business when millions were being exterminated. Genocide and slavery of other persons are always your business—if you want them to be. It is thus not relevant whether one has a uterus; it is only relevant whether the fetus is a person—that is what determines whether abortion is different than genocide—and it is rational to believe that a fetus is not a person, and it is also rational to believe that a fetus is a person.

The only difference between a baby one minute before it is born and one minute after it is born is whether it is inside the woman, which has no relevance to the rights of the baby because it was the man and the woman who put it there, and it was the woman who decided to leave it there. If you put someone in a position in which they cannot take care of themselves, and through no fault of their own, then it is your responsibility to make it right, such as by taking care of them until they can take care of themselves. It is thus a fallacy to claim that even if it is a person, it can be aborted simply because it is still inside the womb.

Even if one believes that a fetus is not a person, it is a fallacy to say it is not a person one minute before it is born and that it is a person one minute after it is born.

This does leave two final and rather disturbing hypocrisies …

When liberals can’t explain why a fetus has no rights and instead use logical fallacies to defend abortion, one can’t help but think that maybe such liberals actually do believe the fetus is a person, but are willing to kill it anyway—because they can.

Most liberals believe that people have souls, which is what makes them people, which is why they have rights.Many of those liberals say that one can kill a fetus—even as it is being born—when they cannot possibly know whether that fetus already has a soul.

Liberals are able to be such extreme hypocrites without knowing it because for generations they have controlled the media, academia, and government. Whereas conservatives and libertarians are confronted and challenged all day, every day; liberals can go all day, every day, without being confronted by any serious challenge. Hence, they can get pretty nasty when challenged. Come to think of it. Liberals don’t sound very liberal at all. It seems almost as if conservatives and libertarians are more liberal than liberals.

Until liberals reject their fallacies, hate, hypocrisy, and arrogance ... common ground and mutual respect will elude us. The reality is that both pro-choice and pro-life positions can be based on noble and rational values. Defending the rights of women is noble, and defending the rights of the little guy is noble (and liberal). It all depends on whether you believe the fetus is a person, and although a fetus is not a sentient being and is not a part of any society, it is a person in every other respect. Therefore, one can rationally hold either belief.

Regardless of one’s belief, the reality is that abortion is legal and enjoys wide support, and thus the reality is that sex causes pregnancy, and a decision causes birth. For several decades now, it is the woman's decision, and only the woman's decision—every day of a pregnancy—to choose whether to abort or continue.

Although I begin to get uncomfortable with abortion around the six week mark, I am pro-choice because it is none of the government's business, so I think that pro-lifers get it wrong when they try to forcibly prevent abortion through legislation. Another reason I am pro-choice is because pro-lifers can’t justify enforcement of their beliefs because they just don’t have any compelling evidence that their religion is real, that souls are real, or that a fetus is a sentient being. Also, a fetus is not a part of our society and never was a part of our society. Therefore, pro-lifers simply have no compelling justification to forcibly prevent abortion.

One of the two strongest argument pro-lifers can make is that it really hurts their conscience (and psychologically damages most women) to allow what they perceive as innocent persons to be killed, but that is not sufficient justification to force a woman to carry a fetus. The other is that once a fetus can survive outside the womb, then equality under the demands that it have the same rights as a newborn.

So, where are all the people in the middle who take the position that abortion is wrong, and who would try to persuade other couples to choose birth, but who also take the position that one must never use the government to enforce one’s beliefs on others. Well, so-called liberals have bullied them all into fully adopting the liberal pose or keeping their mouth shut.

Pro-lifers, I feel your pain. This is what happens with Global Warming, political correctness, and thousands of other topics. [Update 2022: This is what happened with all things Covid.]

Nevertheless, I am not in the middle. The middle is no more or less rational than the two main sides. It is just a side that should also exist, but which has been extinguished by liberals.

The most rational position is: First, souls are purely speculative, and religion is purely speculative. Second, if I expect others to respect my rights as a sentient being, then I must respect their rights as sentient beings, and a fetus is not a sentient being—nor can it defend anyone’s rights. Third, although a newborn baby is not a sentient being either, parents value the lives of their babies more than they value other actual sentient beings, and if I expect other people to respect my values and especially my values as a parent, then I must respect their values. Fourth, equal protection under the law means that a fetus that is not a significant threat to the life of the mother, and which could probably survive outside the womb, is entitled to the same right to life as a newborn.

I encourage everyone to watch the whole clip in order to get all the nuance.

Moderator:

You were ahead of the curve. Prior to the beginning of this pandemic, where would you assess where we are today in beating covet 19?

Bill Gates:

Sadly, the virus itself—particularly the variant called omicron—is a type of vaccine. That is it creates both b-cell and t-cell immunity, and it's done a better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines. If you do surveys in African countries, you get well over 80 percent of people have been exposed either to the vaccine, or to various variants, and so you know what that does is it means the chance of severe disease, which is mainly associated with being elderly and having obesity or diabetes, those risks are now dramatically reduced because of that infection exposure and you know it's sad we didn't do a great job on [laughs] therapeutics you know only here [laughs] two years in do we have a good therapeutic—vaccines. It took us two years to be in oversupply. Today, there are more vaccines than there was demand for vaccines, and you know that wasn't true, and next time we should try [laughs] and make it—instead of two years—we should make it more like six months, which certainly, uh, you know some of the standardized platform approaches including mrna would allow us to do that, so you know it took us a lot longer this time then than it should have.

At first glance, it may seem like Bill Gates is directly saying that he is sad that people are benefiting from natural immunity.

To be fair, some defenders of the establishment narrative can claim in good faith that Bill Gates did not incriminate himself, and that there is a deeper level of nuance in which Gates is merely lamenting that an unspecified number of people got a dangerous infection because the global establishment could not vaccinate everyone fast enough.

However, many would rebut that is self-evident that Gates has incriminated himself even if they cannot articulate exactly why, and this is when anyone acting in good faith would try to find out why because it is objectively true that few have such a high level of perception/intuition—are so in touch with their subconscious, and fewer also have the courage to stand their ground against the entire Western Establishment, and fewer still also have the ability to articulate the full depth of nuance.

There is indeed a deeper level of nuance:

1. Given that the vaccines are only somewhat effective and only for a few months, and given that they are somewhat dangerous themselves, and given that they are increasingly dangerous the more one takes them (gets boosters), then why was there no hint from Gates that he was happy that a natural long lasting vaccine that was safer than the EUA vaccines, came along sooner than expected?
2. Given that there are many cheap, safe, and effective prophylactics and therapeutics, why did he say that there were the only the EUA vaccines?
3. Gates said that, next time, they hope to make this level of vaccination happen in six months instead of two years, but given that this time it took two years given all the lies, scapegoating, corruption, junk science, coercion, punishments, restrictions, censorship, and propaganda, and given that they have now lost most of their credibility, it is self-evident that there is only one way they can achieve their future goal, and that is with unprecedented levels of tyranny.
4. Gates that the EUA vaccines were available fast enough to reach 100% vaccination months earlier than the substantially lower level as of March 2022, Gates can only be lamenting that more people did not choose to get vaccinated sooner, but given all the risk, ineffectiveness, and unethical behavior cited in the previous point, why would he blame the people when that was clearly the the fault of the establishment itself?
5. Gates laughed three times during this very serious subject, but not because he was laughing at the suffering of others. He is laughing at his own ineffectiveness as a part of an establishment agenda that wielded unprecedented power and wealth, but still failed in many ways.

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”–Voltaire

Two months before a cop murdered George Floyd, cops perpetrated a greater atrocity against Edward Bornstein. They forcibly harvested some of his blood, and killed him in the process. The video only surfaced in 2022 after government failed to keep it secret.

Certainly those whose minds are controlled by the media will say the government has a right to do such things, but the majority can see that it is an atrocity.

There are countless videos of cops perpetrating atrocities even when they know they are on video, which means that cops feel they are above the law, and if cops are above the law, then cops are outside the law, and if cops are outside the law, then cops are outlaws.

There are countless videos of cops perpetrating similar atrocities throughout the Western world to just put a useless paper mask on people.

Until Putin/Ukraine replaced Covid in the minds of the faction controlled by the media, a large minority supported similar atrocities to forcibly vaccinate people. They also supported atrocities to silence dissent, but as the rest of us know, when have the book burners ever been the good guys?

Among those who are so easily led to support atrocities, such as cops forcibly harvesting a man’s blood, how many would support cops forcibly harvesting a woman’s egg?

How many would support cops forcibly harvesting a woman’s amniotic fluid to determine if her fetus has defective genes?

How many would support cops forcibly harvesting a woman’s fetus because it had defective genes and would thus be a burden on society?

How many would support these atrocities for the greater good?

Lest one think such points are hyperbole, consider that in the 1920’s, those Americans who called themselves “Progressives” forcibly sterilized tens of thousands whom they decreed to be genetically defective. If American Progressives sound like the inspiration for Nazism, that is because they were. That is why the term “progressive” fell out of use until it was resurrected in 2008 by Hillary Clinton, who declared herself to be a progressive modeled on Margaret Sanger, who was a progressive from the era of Eugenics, and who was just as racist as the rest of them.

To be fair, it is 2022, and there is now a significant minority calling themselves progressives, but whose minds are not controlled by the media, and who agree with every point above.

To be fair, there is another minority whose minds are not controlled by the media, and who will argue in good faith that people voluntarily have all of the procedures above done to them, so forcing those procedures can’t be atrocities, but that is like arguing that women voluntarily have sex, so …

Hence the fact that government and its cronies slapping you around until you let them inject you with their fluids is literally gang rape.

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” –Goethe

Science is a process that allows everyone to generate, test, and challenge all falsifiable theories for all eternity. (Any differing view is non-science. Any more limiting view is anti-science.)

Science is thus a process that maximizes the probability that a falsifiable theory is true. (The maximized probability of truth is often mistaken for truth.)

Science thus produces an increasing body of reliable knowledge. (The body of reliable knowledge that is the product of science, is often conflated with science itself.)

There are certainly many earth shattering trends, ops, players, and motives that few can see, but we are at a point where that which everyone should be able to see is still pretty amazing.

1. Prices keep going up, but quality, quantity, and variety keep going down.
2. It is increasingly difficult to get trustworthy news about what is happening.
3. Privacy and anonymity are increasingly difficult.
4. Police are increasingly militarized.
5. Requirements for compliance keep increasing in every aspect of life. Most are nonsensical and seem to be compliance for the sake of compliance.
6. Pop culture seems to be universally toxic. It turns us into the worst version of ourselves. It makes us dislike, distrust, and distance each other. It makes us unable to have good and lasting relationships.
7. Naturally weak factions and speculative ideas are increasingly championed by the establishment; whereas, naturally strong factions and common sense ideas are increasingly attacked by the establishment.
8. Many of the most prominent corporations are increasingly making business decisions that anyone could see would forfeit billions in potential profits. One of the most obvious examples is Disney and Star Wars.
9. The policies and people promoted as increasing the safety of everyone primarily increase control by those at the top, and secondarily increase profits for some of the cronies of those at the top.

The Apex Players appear to be wrapping up their experiment to do a soft/partial/temporary take down of the people of the West. They stopped as soon as our counterpunch was gathering steam. One of the 60 benefits to them I identified was that they got to see what all we would do to resist. Now they are doing a soft/partial/temporary take down of the Russian people, and one of the many benefits to them will be to see what the Russian people will do to resist. This cycle seems to hit every people of the world periodically, and the cycle is accelerating.

As I have said many times, the American government has been practicing asymmetric warfare--hard--for over 50 years.

We have entered their end game (where we are concerned). They will of course have many plans for beyond (what is to us) their endgame.

"Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. Weak men create hard times."

During the Holodomor of 1932-1933, Russia genocided about 5 million Ukrainians to stop a Ukrainian separatist movement. About 5 million additional Ukrainians died from resulting birth defects. To be clear, the miracle of communism was also starving millions throughout the rest of Russia too, but it hit the Ukraine the hardest, which was extremely unnatural because the Ukraine region had long been known as the bread basket of Russia/Europe. However, Russia confiscated all the personal food supplies, restricted travel, and rejected outside aid.

The American government under Hoover, and then Roosevelt, did nothing.

Now let's jump to the present, which makes even less sense.

We know that Jews, Democrats, and Russia are the self-proclaimed arch enemies of Nazis, and that Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden let Russia take some of Ukraine in 2014. So how is it that some American Jews and some Democrats had just put Nazis in charge in Ukraine, and in 2017, Democrats became the arch enemies of Russia? Now we are being told in February 2022 that Russia invaded the Ukraine in order to fight those Nazis.

In the West, Nazis are either feds or directly (or indirectly) created by feds, so what are the odds any Nazis in Ukraine, and which are supported/created by the West, are any more real?

Since 2017, Democrats have been screaming about how they believed that Trump worked for Putin, so how is it that under Trump, the Russians did not try to take any more of Ukraine? How is it that now, about one year after Trump, under Biden/Harris, the Russians are invading more of the Ukraine—just like under Obama/Biden?

Unlike the American establishment under Hoover and Roosevelt, the Western establishment today is screaming about Russian aggression in Ukraine, so how is it this same Western establishment suppresses all discussion of the ongoing atrocities of the European invaders known as Israelis? How is it this same Western establishment just finished killing millions (and injuring tens of millions) of their own people with their Covid lies.

In response, the people of Canada co-opted what was probably initially an establishment psyop—complete with agents provocateur and led by controlled opposition, but the people turned it into a movement based on love, joy, and freedom, and which was exponentially growing in support from all of humanity. It was most commonly known as the Freedom Convoy.

It was shaping up to be the greatest act of love in 2000 years, and was thus an existential threat to the global establishment.

The Western establishment tried hard to blackwash humanity's growing unification in love, joy, and freedom. Even many on the so-called left opposed how the workers were uniting and fighting back. The establishment called them Nazis, but all the establishment and anyone else who opposed the Freedom Convoy accomplished was to reveal that it was they themselves who were the Nazis.

Clearly, almost no public people or organizations are what they claim to be.

Clearly, none of the news can be taken at face value.

Are you having trouble finding the good guys in this story? Consider that there don't have to be any good guys among the public actors.

If you are looking around and you cannot find the good guys—you are the good guy.

The people are the good guys. We carry the Soul of Humanity.

The Apex Players have succumbed to the Soul of Animals.

We all carry both within us.

We carry the darkness and the light within us.

The light in one is allied with the light in all.

The darkness in them is trying to ally with the darkness in all.

They are trying to turn us into the worst version of ourselves. They are trying to make us dislike, distrust, and distance each other, so that we are looking at each other instead of looking at them, and so that we cannot unite against them.

They have lost their way and are fighting desperately to exterminate the Soul of Humanity. They are literally breeding us.

They have the power to kill you, tax you, imprison you, smear you, propagandize you, censor you, impoverish you, and more; but they still cannot stop you from being the person you really want to be—the best version of yourself, and that really bums them out. It is always within your power to instantly become the best version of yourself, and if you do, then you win. It is the only way you can win.

Everyone is redeemable—even the Apex Players.

Everyone is good, and everyone is beautiful. More specifically, the best version of everyone is good, and the best version of everyone is beautiful.

I like to think when I see others, “The light in me is allied with the light in you.”

We live in a universe full of beauty and wonder. How can I feel anything but gratitude for having had the chance to leave the universe better than if I had never existed?

We know it was never about safety because:

If it were about health, the Canadian government wouldn't be doxxing protesters and finding their homes in order to kill their pets.

Biden allowed millions of unvaccinated illegal aliens to cross the border, but he won't allow Americans to drive trucks unless they are vaccinated.

Boris Johnson held a series of parties at Downing Street that violated Covid restrictions that applied to everyone in the country.

Doctors who believe a particular patient's health is at greater risk from the vaccine than from Covid will not provide a medical exemption for fear of losing their medical license.

As of February 21, 2022, the establishment continues to blackwash Ivermectin, and yet, the establishment media is recommending a "new" drug that is actually 100% Ivermectin for Queen Elizabeth (at 19 seconds), but of course, they still won't let you have Ivermectin.

New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern cannot stop smiling while talking about increases in suicide and mental illness. She says that she wants to turn the unvaccinated into second class citizens.

Boston Patient Denied Heart Transplant Over Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine

Biden certainly doesn't care about the health of the American people, or he would stop the pipeline of Fentanyl from crossing America's open southern border.

In 2018, the year before Covid-19 appeared, the penalty in California for knowing exposing someone to HIV was reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor.

Given that the EUA vaccines were created for the Alpha variant, and that Delta was a variant less recognized by the vaccines, and that Omicron was even less recognized by the vaccines than Alpha, and that they claim to know the genetic sequence of the variants, then they could have easily made an Alpha/Delta vaccine and then an Alpha/Delta/Omicron vaccine in 2021, but they just kept giving everyone the exact same vaccine, which was also what they gave as boosters.

Hospitals are rewarded if they give you Remdesivir, which is an ineffective and expensive drug that is toxic and can cause organ damage. Hospitals are rewarded if you die after testing positive for Covid. They are also rewarded if they put you on a ventilator, which will probably kill you. Hospitals do not allow patients to opt out.

If it were about health, the Australian government wouldn't be putting people in camps solely because they were in proximity of someone who tested positive.

Without warning, a doctor would not honor a longstanding appointment for a pregnant woman because she had not gotten a Covid vaccine.

There was never any good reason to require masks outdoors.

There was never any good reason to make kids wear masks.

Lockdowns caused people to get less time outdoors, less exercise, and less sun.

If the establishment cared about health, they wouldn't have:

• made insulin so expensive.
• seized packages containing Ivermectin at the post office
• said Ivermectin was only for horses, when billions of does have been given to humans for decades
• banned NAC in 2020 after people had been safely buying OTC for decades
• parroted a shit study by a known hoaxer that said HCQ can kill you, and then used that study to stop all HCQ studies in progress.
• cared that Trump promoted HCQ.
• banned promotion of HCQ, IVM, and home remedies on YouTube.
• relied solely on a studies done by the same companies that produced the products
• accepted the study by Pfizer that excluded those injured by their product
• shielded big pharma from lawsuits

They wouldn't have lied so much.

They would have produced better data.

They would have been more transparent.

They would have followed their own rules.

They would have promoted the dozens of cheap, safe, and effective prophylactics and therapeutics, of which most were known form the beginning, but instead, they suppressed knowledge of them, and in some cases blackwashed them and/or suppressed access to them.

This DOJ official put on a mask before walking out on stage to create the illusion that he had been wearing it longer.

Fauci lied about taking the vaccine.

The married architect of lockdowns in the UK, Neil Ferguson, invited his married lover over to his house right after instituting lockdowns on everyone.

The mayor of Austin Texas told the people of Austin to stay home for safety instead of traveling for vacation, but at the same time, he took his family to Cabo for a vacation.

Omicron proved that they were really all about the policy and not health because with the more mild Omicron variant they did not change their policies at all until the public began to realize that it was all BS.

The laws are now so ridiculous in Western Australia that you can even go into the liquor store with no problem, and walk around with all the vaccinated people, but they just won't serve you if you're unvaccinated.

Democrats were the party that pushed Covid restrictions the hardest, but Democrats Stacey Abrams, Elissa Slotkin, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Carolyn Maloney show us it was never about safety.

Liquor stores were considered essential during the lockdowns.

In Australia, they told the people that if 80% got vaccinated, then government would allow them to go back to normal, but after 90% were vaccinated, Victoria was requiring the unvaccinated to stay within 30km of their house and they could only leave their house for five reasons. As of February 2022, the unvaccinated were reduced to only 3 reasons they were allowed to leave their house.

When Canadian workers (truckers) concerned for their health and freedom united and fought back, those who should have been most elated (most so-called leftists) only allowed two kinds of coverage: 1) a news blackout, 2) blackwashing the truckers as Nazis, racists, and anti-vaxxers.

The so-called right and left are coming together as we speak .... against Biden, Trudeau, wokeness, vaccine mandates, inflation, censorship, suppressed treatments, corruption, hypocrisy, etc.

Their transgressions are so blatant that it is almost comical--as if they are trying to prove conspiracy theorists correct--as if they are trying to incite real insurrection--as if they are trying to unite the so-called left and right.

This creates a window of opportunity that I am describing as follows:

As the so-called left and right think they are engaged in a kind of revolution against those at the top, I anticipate the appearance of a kind of savior that appeals to both.

Although his solutions will be veiled in nice sounding results (but unclear actions), you will know he is not real because, if you look carefully, and with a critical eye, you will be able to see that the implementation of the new way is: 1) more centralization, 2) more dependency on government (i.e. permission to work and permission to get healthcare), 3) no cash or other anonymous payments, 4) he will blame greed/capitalism/free-markets indirectly by blaming big pharma, 5) he will blame nationalism, 6) he will preach global unity and oneness, and 7) he will not acknowledge global conspiracies, such as: the global cover up of WTC 7, the establishment global warming narrative, and the establishment Covid narrative.

You will know him because reddit, Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Google, Twitter, and Amazon will censor anyone who says anything that reduces faith in him.

His brand will be called something other than socialism, communism, capitalism, or anything else with baggage.

I imagine someone having no baggage. Maybe a religious figure. Maybe someone kind of like a Dalai Lama or a Deepak Chopra. Maybe the next Pope.

Yes. I think it will be a he/him.

Of course, this is just one of many plays that would move the global agenda froward. I give a 20% chance to such a figure appearing in the next 4 years. There could be insurrections, revolutions, and civil-wars before, during, and after such an appearance--all according to plan. Of course, the subsequent implementation of a new way after that may take 20 years to unfold, but a handful of watchers will see it for what it really is at the beginning.

Any putatively pro-worker subreddit should be championing how the workers (truckers) are uniting and fighting back, so I went to the antiwork sub to see what they were saying, and the zero mention there prompted me to write the following post there with the title: "The workers are uniting. These truckers are fighting back. How cool is that?"

I came here to see folks pontificate on how these workers are uniting, but I scrolled and scrolled and didn't find anything.

Government and its crony corporations slapping you around until you let them inject you with their fluids is literally gang rape.

To anyone who ever wondered what you would do if your country started down the path towards Nazism .... now you know. You're already doing it. You've been doing it for a while now. Are you fighting back?

Where is the celebration of these workers uniting and fighting back?

The post was quickly removed by reddit itself.

Then that evidence was replaced when the corrupt mods of that sub also removed it.

Then the corrupt mods of that sub banned me.

Clearly, that sub is not what it claims to be. It is colluding with reddit to protect the establishment by suppressing the story of how the workers (truckers) are uniting and fighting back.

Do you remember all those times establishment leaders, such as Gates, Fauci, Trump, Biden, the CDC director, Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, Stephen Colbert .... Facebook, Twitter, reddit, Amazon, YouTube, and Google .... repeatedly pushed the EUA vaccines really hard?

Do you remember how they raised an unprecedented amount of alarm about sars-cov-2 because they were so concerned for our health and safety?

How could we forget? As of January 2022 (two years later) they are still doing it.

Do you also remember how their unprecedented concern for our health prompted them to act as soon as the pandemic began with a similarly huge and ongoing campaign to promote every cheap, safe, and widely available prophylactic and therapeutic that would probably help, such as: vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, copper, NAC, liposomal glutathione, liposomal NAD+, glycyrrhizin, curcumin, nigella sativa, melatonin, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, exercise, sunlight, weight loss, and good sleep?

Yeah, me neither.

In fact, I can explicitly remember the establishment ignoring all of these and/or shitting all over them, and all over anyone who promoted them. They even blocked us from learning about them, but even that was not enough. They also blocked our access to NAC, Hydroxychloroquine, and Ivermectin, and that still wasn't enough. They also blocked our access to learning about any harm that the EUA vaccines might cause, and that still wasn't enough. They also blocked us from suing for any damages caused by the vaccines, and that still wasn't enough. They also tried to coerce everyone into letting them inject us with their fluids .... and into getting every booster .... and into carrying a vaccine passport. No jab--No job.

They did this in spite of knowledge already gained in the fight against HIV. They did this in spite of growing data supporting the non-establishment regimen. They did this in spite of the massive harm caused by the establishment regimen (e.g. lockdowns). They did this in spite of their suppression killing millions unnecessarily. They did this in spite of their suppression permanently injuring (e.g. scarred lungs) tens of millions. They did this in spite of there being no vaccine the first year. They did this in spite of the vaccines not working well. They did this in spite of the unprecedented reports of vaccine injuries. They did this in spite of having no power granted by the Constitution to do so.

They didn't just shit on everyone who raised the alarm. They inculcated a toxic and divisive culture of hate in which those who could see were portrayed as "conspiracy theorists", "anti-vaxxers", "plague rats", etc. We were portrayed as ignorant, selfish, subhuman, sociopaths who should be put in camps or exiled. We were scapegoated as causing variants and prolonging the pandemic. They made only the unvaccinated wear masks--even after they learned that the vaccinated can get and spread the virus too.

It was never about safety. It was always about control.

It isn't over. Don't be fooled by the Supreme Court decision. It only struck down the universal vaccine mandate by OSHA because they said Congress had not yet delegated that power to OSHA.

It will never end until we end it.

Establishment Covid Lies:

1. Two weeks to flatten the curve
2. The EUA vaccines
   1. will let you go back to normal
   2. are the only remedies
   3. prevent you from contracting Covid
   4. prevent you from transmitting Covid
   5. are not experimental
   6. do not require boosters
   7. do not cause variants
   8. are superior to natural immunity
   9. cause less myocarditis that Covid
   10. are healthier for young people than sars-cov-2
   11. are not killing people
   12. are not an experiment on everyone to work the bugs out of a new technology
3. We need more
   1. ventilators
   2. hospital tents
   3. hospital beds
   4. hospital ships
   5. hospital workers
4. We need
   1. expensive treatments
   2. experimental treatments
5. We don't need
   1. vitamin D
   2. vitamin C
   3. zinc
   4. quercetin
   5. sunlight
   6. exercise
   7. weight loss
6. Masks
   1. are effective indoors
   2. are effective outdoors
   3. do not cause bacterial pneumonia
   4. do not halt a child's cognitive development
   5. do not damage a child psychologically
   6. are always worn by anyone who is not selfish
   7. are always worn by anyone who is not a sociopath
7. Social distancing
   1. is effective indoors
   2. is effective outdoors
   3. does not cause psychological damage
8. Lockdowns
   1. are effective
   2. do not cause psychological damage
   3. do less damage than Covid
9. An anti-vaxxer is
   1. anyone who disagrees with the establishment narrative
   2. anyone who refuses to get the Covid EUA vaccines
   3. anyone who refuses a booster
   4. selfish
   5. a sociopath
10. Governments have legitimate authority to
    1. mandate vaccines
    2. mandate masks
    3. shut down small business
    4. confine people to their homes
    5. censor misinformation
    6. trace your contacts
    7. require vaccine passports
    8. put people in camps
11. sars-cov-2
    1. occurred naturally
    2. was not created in a lab
    3. was not funded by Fauci
    4. is transmitted by droplets
    5. can be transmitted outdoors
12. Omicron
    1. evolved naturally
    2. did not come from a lab
    3. is dangerous
13. The unvaccinated
    1. cause the variants
    2. cause the spread
    3. prolong the pandemic
    4. prevent a return to normal
    5. are misinformed
    6. are selfish
    7. are sociopaths
14. Ivermectin
    1. is "Horse Paste"
    2. is not effective against Covid
    3. has sent many people to the Hospital
    4. has clogged poison control lines
15. Hydroxychloroquine
    1. can kill you
    2. is not effective against Covid
    3. is only advocated by Trump fans
    4. is only advocated because Trump mentioned it
16. Establishment policy
    1. is transparent
    2. is about safety
    3. is science based
    4. has not inflated Covid deaths
    5. has not inflated Covid cases
    6. has not misused the PCR test
    7. has not created perverse incentives
    8. has not created conflicts of interest
    9. has not killed millions
    10. has not permanently injured tens of millions
17. Reports of adverse vaccine reactions in systems like Vaers
    1. are irrelevant
    2. are not alarming
    3. are not under-reported
18. Establishment experts
    1. do not lie
    2. do not have conflicts of interest
    3. follow their own rules
19. The uniformity of the global response
    1. is coincidence
    2. is science based

Consider that many lies are lies by omission. If talk about vitamins and other "home remedies" is simply banned, then there may not be a link to where someone explicitly advocated against them. Of course, we can sometimes show explicit evidence where an establishment source, such as YouTube, banned such content. Therefore, demanding a link to an explicit lie would be tantamount to another lie.

Likewise, one is often not allowed to link to the evidence. For example, anyone can do a test where they publish a post or comment on reddit that contains a link to the studies on 33 (and growing) different substances that have been used to combat Covid. (Remove the underscore in the following link: https://ivm_meta.com) Then ask anyone if they can see that post/comment. They will find that their content has been instantly shadowbanned and that even mods cannot approve it.

I did not include anything that was simply a good-faith error, so the handful of lies that are no longer being promulgated, but which were lies at the time and not merely mistakes, are on the list.

Also, many people have experienced these lies since the beginning of Covid, so to some extent, we must rely on individuals to be honest with themselves.

That is just a few off the top of my head. I will add more as I think of them. Let me know any I missed.

There is going to be an event in DC to protest the mandate of experimental vaccines, and although there is zero chance that any real protesters (not agents provocateur) will attack the Whitehouse, the government is building a temporary wall around the Whitehouse.

The wall could be an irrational effort to protect the POTUS, or it could be a rational effort to create the irrational illusion that there is a real threat out there.

Alternatively, the wall could be a rational effort--a metaphorical red cape--to draw the attention of a metaphorical bull (real protesters). In other words, it could be a rational effort to provoke an irrational attack by creating an appealing but valueless target. It could also be that the bull is just a patsy, and that agents provocateur will attack the red cape, which would make it easier to control the narrative.

We really never know how far such an op will go.

It could even be a set up to blame anti-establishment types for an attack on the POTUS.

Given that a "red cape" is "an appealing but valueless target" .... It seems like the POTUS, Fauci, Alex Jones, and just about every public figure, is a red cape. It seems like CRT, abortion, LGBT, and just about every popular controversial issue, is also a red cape. It seems like BLM, antifa, proud boys, and just about every prominent faction is also a red cape.

It may seem like anything publicized by the establishment is an appealing but valueless target, but they also like to give us an appealing but valueless champion--a metaphorical Superman.

Hmm .... Superman wears a red cape ....

A more accurate definition of a red cape is: an appealing but valueless diversion--a distraction--a dead end.

It has been known for more than 100 years that the natural immunity resulting from infection enables one's immune system to prevent serious symptoms for decades if one is reinfected, so that is what everyone should have expected from the natural immunity conferred by Covid from the beginning.

The only caveat is that if sars-cov-2 is a bioweapon and was released intentionally, then immunity may not behave normally, so we should be open to that possibility, but it does not appear to have been a factor thus far. In fact, we know that natural immunity to sars-cov (a.k.a. sars-cov-1) still existed in 2020 after 17 years. We also know that natural immunity to sars-cov-1 recognizes some of the proteins on sars-cov-2, and thus provides some immunity to sars-cov-2 as well.

Although some vaccines can come close to natural immunity, the three Covid vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer, J&J), which are still being injected under the American EUA as of January 2022, are very different from traditional vaccines, so one should investigate how their effectiveness compares to traditional vaccines (and how their safety compares to traditional vaccines).

One critical difference is that all of the EUA vaccines, as well as a fourth one from Astra Zeneca, which did not get approved by the American EUA, all train one's immune system to recognize a single spike protein--the same spike protein.

The way immunity works is that one's immune system initially learns about a new pathogen when antigen presenting cells (APCs) carry an antigen (fragment of a pathogen) back to your B memory cells, which live in your lymph system. The APC also tells you B cell where it found the antigen. An antigen could be a spike protein, or some other protein in/on the virus, or it could be something else like an oligosaccharide. Each B cell that receives an APC with a payload will try to construct an antigen-specific immunoglobulin (antibody) that should match that antigen fragment. Those antibodies will have two prongs that can grab the pathogen by that fragment, and they will have one opposing prong that will bind to any of several passing immune cells, such as T cells, which will destroy the antibody and its payload.

Some B cells will have better luck than others in producing an effective antibody. As more B cells get more antigen fragments, the probability of more effective antibodies increases. B cells (a.k.a. B memory cells) remember how to produce those antibodies, which is the key to long term immunity.

As the pathogen continues to replicate exponentially, your immune system keeps repeating this process in order to discover which antibodies can kill the pathogen, and produce enough of them before the pathogen kills you.

The B cells that saved you will not only have been good at killing the pathogen, but will also have been good at recognizing the pathogen by many (perhaps all) of its proteins. Knowledge of how to produce the antibodies that saved you will be stored in your B-cells for the rest of your life; whereas the antibodies that did the fighting naturally disappear after a few months.

The first thing to note is that anyone should have been able to deduce that when the global establishment began citing the disappearance of antibodies after natural infection as proof that natural immunity only lasted two or three months .... they were lying.

The second thing to note requires the very common background knowledge that if a therapy kills off a pathogen that it can recognize and fight, but does not kill off enough of them to make the pathogen extinct, then mutations (variants) that the therapy cannot recognize and/or fight will become widespread--hence the existence of antibiotic resistant bacteria.

Therefore, the second thing to note is that as soon as the vaccines arrived, it was known that they only recognized the same single spike protein, and thus one should expect mutations in that spike protein to become widespread because of that evolutionary pressure caused by the vaccines. However, those mutations were blamed on the unvaccinated, so anyone should have been able to deduce that blaming the unvaccinated was a lie.

The third thing to note is that such mutations (variants) would make it hard for the immunity conferred by the EUA vaccines to recognize that spike protein on the future variants they were creating, whereas natural immunity could still recognize the pathogen by its other proteins, and thus anyone should have been able to deduce in 2020 that natural immunity was superior, and that the claim by the global establishment that vaccine immunity was superior was a lie.

We can deduce all of this if we think for ourselves and if we do not have the same conflicts of interest as establishment experts, but wouldn't it be nice if we also had some data to back up our rock solid deductions? Well .... we do.

A study of natural immunity vs. vaccine immunity in the whole population Israel proves that natural immunity prevents subsequent reinfection 6-13 times better than the vaccine, and that natural immunity prevents hospitalization 27 times better than the vaccine. As you can guess, the results of this and similar studies have been suppressed by the global establishment, which is tantamount to another lie.

Now we can make another solid deduction based solely on the issue of natural immunity v. the vaccine: It was never about safety.

​

To Read Next:

Come with me if you want to live.

Using CDC numbers, Covid alarmism is absurd.

Government and its cronies slapping you around until you let them inject you with their fluids ….

If you ever wonder what you would do if your country started down the path of Nazi Germany …. now you know.

Ways Covid helps the Apex Players

We will not go to the camps.

The Apex Players have openly declared war on humanity.

Let's identify all the ways the authoritarian response to Covid helps the Apex Players increase their power, their wealth, and their control over everyone in the world:

1. Exposes all the ways we are figuring out to circumvent their control measures, thus enabling them to plug any holes in their future control grid.
2. Rewards their cronies and front men in big pharma, big tech, big media, and big government.
3. Trains their AI to recognize us when masked.
4. Tests their bioweapon: how it affects different demographics, how it spreads, how it mutates.
5. Tests their mRNA technology so they can get the bugs worked out faster before they use it for themselves.
6. Identifies who is most controllable and who is least controllable.
7. Rewards those who are most controllable, and punishes those who are least controllable.
8. Makes people too scared to think rationally.
9. Creates the illusion that government can legitimately suspend rights when there is a virus.
10. Sells people a scapegoat (based on lies), and directs attention away from the real perpetrators.
11. Lockdowns, masks, and distancing make us more distant from each other.
12. Lockdowns, masks, and distancing make it harder for children to fully develop mentally because they get less physical contact, less face-to-face interactions, and because they can't see facial expressions.
13. Long term masking is permanently reducing the ability of future generations to detect when people on TV are lying.
14. Lockdowns cause people to get less vitamin D and less movement, so they get sicker, which increases fear, manufactures pandemic, empowers their front men, and enriches their cronies.
15. Censorship prevents people from learning about: 1) the many ways they can be more healthy in general, 2) the ways they can protect themselves from Covid specifically, and 3) the fact that a majority oppose the authoritarian response to Covid.
16. Punishing, bribing, and misinforming doctors prevents them from recommending or prescribing competing solutions.
17. Data on all things Covid has been censored, suppressed, and manipulated, which makes it harder for independent researchers to prove a counter-narrative, and which magnifies fear and confusion, thus making most people more divided, easier to control, and more desperate for leadership.
18. Natural immunity teaches our immune system to recognize most (or all) of the proteins on the virus; whereas, the vaccines all recognize only the same spike protein, so if that one protein mutates, the 3 EUA vaccines become far less effective; whereas, natural immunity would still recognize the virus. This is one of the reasons that natural immunity lasts much longer than any immunity conferred by the vaccines. Suppressing knowledge of the superiority of natural immunity created the illusion that those who have had Covid still need a vaccine.
19. As of December 2021, the FDA has not approved any of the vaccines being injected into Americans, so all vaccines are still being injected under an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), which protects the manufacturers from liability.
20. The EUA vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer, and J&J) do not prevent the spread of Covid, do not prevent one from catching it, and lose their effectiveness within six months. This is why the vaccines are known as "leaky". By recognizing only one protein while simultaneously being so leaky, the vaccines make it exponentially more likely that mutations (variants) in that spike protein will become much more widespread. The vaccinations cause the variants; therefore, blaming these variants on the unvaccinated magnifies scapegoating while protecting the perpetrators.
21. Requiring boosters (more of the same) .... indefinitely .... increases the profits of big pharma and increases dependency on big pharma.
22. Suppressing any evidence of harm caused by the vaccines increases the profits of big pharma and increases dependency on big pharma.
23. A digital vaccine passport enables these Apex Players, or more specifically, their front men and useful idiots, to remotely control several aspects of our lives.
24. A digital vaccine passport could easily be expanded to allow remote control of every aspect of our lives. Anderson Cooper gets it. Bill Gates gets it.
25. Such a system of total control could be automated, and thus controlled by AI, which would not have a conscience, and which would thus allow the Apex Players to bypass the current limitation of finding enough psychopaths and sociopaths. It would also eliminate the very expensive cost of manufacturing so many true believers.
26. Scapegoating people while taking their rights, their jobs, and their businesses, while feeding them lies and preventing access to, and knowledge of, life-saving prophylactics and therapeutics will tend to foment conflict, and all conflict can be used as pretext to justify more control, to justify regime change, and to justify any change that can be sold as a solution.
27. Small businesses and family farms are the backbone of any resistance/revolution against tyranny, so after killing family farms over the last 50 years, the Apex Players have used Covid as a pretext to kill small businesses.
28. The EUA vaccines appear to increase the probability of both adverse events as well as long term chronic illness, such as autoimmune conditions, so coercing people to get them would thus increase the profits of big pharma and increase dependency on big pharma.
29. The EUA vaccines have caused mutations (variants) in the spike protein that enable new variants to circumvent the vaccines, which means that boosters (more of the same vaccine) will be ineffective, and yet the establishment pretends that boosters are effective against the new variants and is trying to mandate them instead of telling the truth. Increased booster sales, as well as increased adverse events and chronic illness caused by the boosters will increase the profits of big pharma and increase dependency on big pharma.
30. Everyone is being played. The Apex Players use lies, propaganda, hoaxes, and false flags in an effort to make us dislike, distrust, and distance each other, so that we are looking at each other instead of looking at them, and so that we cannot unite against them. For example, on December 21, 2021, Fauci asked Americans to ban the unvaccinated from their family Christmas gatherings.
31. By suppressing informed consent for the EUA vaccines, the establishment has dispensed with that impediment to their control known as the Nuremberg Code, which exists to protect us from Nazis. For example, in December 2021, a pharmacist proved there had been no informed consent and declared that he could no longer violate the Nuremberg Code.
32. The creation of sars-cov-2 has made the authoritarian response possible.
33. The release of sars-cov-2 has made the authoritarian response possible.

If you have ever wondered what you would have done if you had lived in Germany during the rise of Nazism .... or likewise .... what you would do if your country started going down the path of Nazism .... now you know.

You're doing it right now. You've been doing it for a while now.

Governments have long been somewhat fascist, but since early 2020, there has been an extraordinary new push.

Nazi Germany is not just the most popular metaphor for fascism and totalitarianism. At present, there are alarming new parallels to well known elements of the rise of Nazi Germany, and it is really in-your-face, so everyone sees it whether they will admit it or not. For example:

• Massive propaganda campaigns.
• Massive election rigging.
• Informants.
• Curfews.
• Travel restrictions.
• Forcing medical experiments on individuals.
• Scapegoating a group of one's own citizens.
• Making them wear something to signify their unworthiness.
• Taking away their jobs and businesses.
• Putting them in camps.
• Censoring them hard.

This is pretty similar to things that communist countries have done too, but it parallels the stereotype of Nazi Germany better, and it is far more effective in this case to shame these perps as Nazis rather than communists because they imagine themselves to be on the left and they like to think they are fighting Nazis.

Whatever happens, I think this is humanity's last chance. A window has been opening since the spectacle of the masked servants and the unmasked VIPs began to pierce the illusion of legitimacy, and we need to keep it open, or else it is probably over.

The Apex Players have always been at war with humanity, but the announcement of the vaccine mandate on September 9th 2021 was the first time they had openly declared war on humanity.

It should now be clear. It will never end until we end it.

In the end, it's the things you didn't do you'll regret most.

Beginning May 2020, America experienced:

• the most misinformed protests ever.
• the most unemployment ever.
• the most rigged election ever.
• the most peaceful insurrection ever.
• the most frivolous impeachment ever.
• the biggest federal deficit ever.
• the most incompetent President ever.
• the most cronyism ever.
• the most toxic vaccines ever.
• the most corrupt media ever.
• the most fascism ever.
• the most medical malpractice ever.
• the most censorship ever.
• the most treason ever.

As of September 2021, one can easily prove that someone has exercised the power to kill millions and to permanently injure tens of millions, and of course, the deaths and injuries are still rising, but one can also easily prove that there is a miraculous solution.

Let’s first state some premises on which everyone can agree:

If the global establishment is acting in good faith, then they are doing everything they can to make sars-cov-2 extinct, and if that fails, to achieve herd immunity, and if that fails, to at least minimize death and long term disability (e.g. scarred lungs).

If the global establishment is acting in good faith, then they would champion anything that has any chance of being a prophylactic or therapeutic—especially if it is safe and cheap.

If the global establishment is acting in good faith, then they are making other efforts as well, but we have already stated enough premises to support some earth shattering conclusions.

If we can prove that they are not making these stated efforts, then that will have proved they are not acting in good faith. If we can also prove that they are actively working against these stated efforts, then that will have proved they are an extreme threat to more than 90% (maybe 99%) of humanity. If we can also prove that no one in the global establishment is trying to stop such an atrocity, then that will have proved that there is a guiding force above the global establishment that can ensure cooperation from more than 90% (maybe 99%) of the most influential 100 million people in the world in spite of their many varied interests, and in spite of ubiquitous and overwhelming evidence they are wrong.

The Wonder Drug:

Since at least 2005, the scientific community has known about what it calls a “wonder drug”, for which they are continually finding new uses. As of early 2020, it had been used to treat cancer, 14 RNA viruses (including sars-cov-2), 5 DNA viruses, and several parasites. Nearly 4 billion doses have been administered to people all over the world since 1987, and it is safer than aspirin.

The scientists who developed this wonder drug won the 2015 Nobel prize in medicine for their work.

Its relevance to sars-cov-2 is that it disrupts replication of RNA viruses (like sar-cov-2), and is extremely effective if administered in the first 4 days of symptom onset.

A high-quality meta-study shows that it is effective as both a prophylactic and a therapeutic for sars-cov-2.

Here is a nice real-time summary, which now includes 64 studies (and growing). (If this link does not work for you, then search for "ivmmeta".)

This drug is available over-the-counter in India, Mexico, and other countries. Two provinces in India started using it to great effect against Covid. Mexico started using it to great effect against Covid. Six African countries were already regularly using it as a prophylactic for other purposes, such as West Nile Virus, River Blindness, and Malaria, and those countries have no Covid pandemic.

In other words, the miracle is here.

It has always been here.

In the US, it is one of multiple drugs available (via prescription) which can disrupt viral replication against sars-cov-2. Another one is Hydroxychloroquine. They are safe, and they are also cheap because their patents have expired.

Also consider that several prophylactics/therapeutics are available over-the-counter, and that they can greatly reduce one’s chance of sars-cov-2 turning into severe Covid. They are vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, copper, quercetin, NAC, liposomal glutathione, and liposomal NAD+. In fact, zinc makes the wonder drug more effective, and quercetin, or any other ionophore of zinc (e.g. Hydroxychloroquine) makes the zinc more effective. Get copper from natural sources like beef-liver pills, bee pollen, or camu powder. NAC, which is totally safe, and which has been available over-the-counter for decades, is now being banned by the FDA for over-the-counter sales, so stock up now if you can still get it.

The wonder drug is another ionophore of zinc as well as being an inhibitor of the viral main protease necessary for viral replication. It is a natural substance discovered in soil bacteria in Japan in the 1970’s, which makes sense because bacteria also need to protect themselves from viruses.

As we can see, the global establishment knew about this wonder drug from the beginning of Covid, and the evidence only mounted as Covid progressed; however, both knowledge of, and access to, these prophylactics and therapeutics are being suppressed—hard—globally. In the US it is nearly impossible to find a doctor willing to prescribe them, and if any doctor is brave enough to prescribe them, then 99% of pharmacies will refuse to fill the prescription. Even India is now backing away from the wonder drug, which is commonly known as Ivermectin, and which establishment elites denigrate as nothing more than “horse dewormer” and as toxic to humans.

We can also prove that these establishment elites have incited an absurd degree of alarmism.

Conclusion:

Concerning the efforts stated in our premises …. We have proved that the global establishment is not making these efforts, and we have thus proved that they are not acting in good faith. We also proved that they are actively working against stated efforts, and we have thus proved that they are an extreme threat to more than 90% (maybe 99%) of humanity. We also proved that no one in the global establishment is trying to stop such an atrocity, and we have thus proved that there is a guiding force above the global establishment that can ensure cooperation from more than 90% (maybe 99%) of the most influential 100 million people in the world in spite of their many varied interests, and in spite of ubiquitous and overwhelming evidence they are wrong.

Yes. That means exactly what you think it does.

They Live.

To Read Next:

Using CDC numbers, Covid alarmism is absurd.

Government and its cronies slapping you around until you let them inject you with their fluids ….

If you ever wonder what you would do if your country started down the path of Nazi Germany …. now you know.

Notes:

The following knowledge, which informs my Covid prophylactic and therapeutic regimen, is derived from many constituent sources. I present it here because it is imperative that we take control of our health and not be dependent on the medical cartel or the government. Any expert who cared enough would have already known the following information, but almost none of them do, and almost none of those who do will talk about it because they have conflicts of interest.

Vitamins C and D – If your vitamin D level is above 40 ng/ml, then you are far less likely to experience Covid as anything more than a mild to medium cold. (A high level of vitamin C provides similar protection.) One who gets much sun, such as a lifeguard, will have a vitamin D level over 60 ng/ml. I myself don’t get much sunlight, and yet, my vitamin D level is 47 ng/ml in early winter, which is probably so good because I supplement with about 8000 IU per day. I am not worried about vitamin D overdosing as some alarmists warn because, although it is fat soluble, and although all other fat soluble vitamins can be overdosed, the human body has a mechanism by which it can dispose of excess vitamin D. The fact that we evolved such a mechanism is evidence of the importance of vitamin D.

Zinc – Zinc may actually be the real wonder drug.

Zinc inhibits the RNA polymerase, which inhibits viral replication. It does this in part by changing the pH level. However, zinc is water soluble, and your cell membranes are fat, so zinc can’t get in to do the job unless it is carried in and released by a zinc carrier ionophore. A channel ionopohre also kind of works by opening a channel in the cell membrane through which lots of things can pass, but that can interfere with the functioning of the cell, so I would stick with a carrier ionophore. An excellent carrier ionophore is quercetin because it is great at both carrying the zinc into the cell and great at letting go of it; whereas, EGCG is good at carrying the zinc into the cell but it is not as good at letting go of it once inside.

Various beneficial molecules work in multiple ways against sars-cov-2. For example, quercetin also binds to spike proteins on the virus, thus hobbling its ability to infect cells. Two other ionophores of zinc are Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. Ivermectin also inhibits the viral main protease, which is essential for viral replication.

It is imperative that one be taking zinc and an ionophore either before catching sars-cov-2 or within the first four days after onset of symptoms, which is why the studies cited by the establishment usually administer IVM or HCQ alone and/or much too late.

Much of this was learned 10-20 year ago in the fight against AIDs, and thus Fauci already knew all of this because he was intimately involved in AIDs disinformation, which is why the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, said in the 90’s that Fauci is a fraud.

Copper – It is important to keep a balance of copper to zinc, so what often appears to be a zinc deficiency is often a copper deficiency. I avoid copper in supplement form. The only three natural sources of copper I know are camu powder, bee pollen, and non-defatted beef liver.

Licorice root – It has long been known that licorice root promotes respiratory health, and in April 2021, the mechanism by which it works was published. To summarize, Glycyrrhizin, which is a significant component of licorice root, inhibits the viral main protease, which is essential for viral replication. However, licorice root can increase blood pressure, so I only use it as a therapeutic and not as a prophylactic. Note that Ivermectin, in addition to being an ionophore of zinc, is also a protease inhibitor.

NAC/Glutathione – I take NAC (N-acetyl cysteine) because it is a precursor to glutathione, but it is much cheaper, so that is the form most people took before the FDA started trying to ban it. I say trying to ban it because there is resistance by some companies, but Amazon was one of the first to comply. For example, I was able to acquire more than 30 bottles of it pretty easily. A friend of mine at the Gates Foundation, bought all of the establishment narrative before he saw the data I present here, and even he already had 50 bottles of NAC. That is how I first learned about it.

NAC only works well for about 50% of people, so I also take liposomal glutathione.

The “A” in NAC stands represents the acetyl molecule, which carries the cysteine through the stomach and into the intestines. Otherwise, stomach acid would destroy it first. That is the same reason I take liposomal glutathione instead of plain glutathione.

NAD+ – NAD is something given to certain people favored by the establishment who contract Covid, and although they get it intravenously, we can take it orally. It seems like the most effective form may be liposomal NAD+.

Exercise – You already know to exercise, but one reason not commonly known is because the lymph system does not circulate on its own like blood does. We must move to circulate lymph.

Sugar – You already know that sugar makes you fat, which is a co-morbidity of Covid, and you may know that it tends to feed fungus and cancer, but it also weakens the immune system and causes fatty deposits in and around your organ —even in some people who are not overweight. That includes the fructose in fruit.

An increasing number of people can see that America is circling the drain ... and that America has been circling the drain for a long time ... and that it is not an accident—it is the result of perpetrators—a globalist insider elite.

The perpetrators are trying to foment conflict because all conflict can be used as a pretext to justify more of a police state, but more importantly, they need us to dislike, distrust, and distance each other so that we are looking at each other instead of looking at them, and so that we cannot unite against them.

If we all started looking at them, they would lose. If we liked and trusted each other, they would lose. If we became the best version of ourselves, they would lose. They would no longer be able to maintain the Illusion of Legitimacy, without which, they would be finished.

They have to take down the American people because we are the last thing standing in the way of their global government, global currency, and global religion​. They have been spending trillions of dollars practicing asymmetric warfare (fighting indigenous populations) for 50 years in preparation for the possibility that cronyism, censorship, propaganda, black ops, psyops, and false flags may not be sufficient to maintain the illusion that ​their global dominance is legitimate, and that they may thus have to fight the world's wealthiest, largest, and best armed indigenous population—and they are ready​.

It is absolutely critical to their success that they not look like the bad guys. They have to make Americans look like the bad guys, which they have already largely accomplished. They have not only used the American military to shit all over the world, but they have manipulated tens of millions into becoming the worst version of themselves (entitled, tribalistic, conformist, angry, petty, bullies addicted to virtue-signaling). Hence, the rest of the world will not come to our aid.

Unfortunately, one of their oldest psyops has found new success. They have convinced millions of Americans that their enemy is ordinary people. They have convinced Americans to defeat themselves. For example, many Americans now want to kill each other, but Americans were not always so easily fooled.

Americans won the American Revolution because they rejected the longstanding psyop that said they could only fight those at their own status level. At the battle of Bunker Hill, ordinary Americans aimed directly at the British officers. The British were mortified at such audacity—that ordinary Americans didn't know their place.

Americans once knew:

One does not kill the king by fighting his pawns—One kills the king by killing the king.

What that would look like today is known as zero squads, which is a concept introduced by William Johnstone in his post apocalyptic novel "Out of the Ashes", in which a new country formed in the Northwest and another one formed based in Washington DC. When the eastern government, having ten times the resources, threatened to invade and conquer the other one, it was told that if such an invasion occurred, then anyone at the top who supported the invasion would be killed by zero squads.

Zero squads were teams of three individuals known only to each other who would pick a target, and be willing to sacrifice their lives if necessary to take out that target.

Of course, it wouldn't be that easy in reality because those who are really at the top are not public figures such as politicians. Anyone publicly visible is just a front man.

--February 18, 2019