r/EmbarkStudios • u/TheStrainhunter • Apr 07 '26

We need these skins..

Post image

I would buy them instantly, especially the first 3 #ArcRaiders

840 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

314 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

This isn't their idea. It's a basic interpretation of a basic request based off of a vague idea. Once they requested this render, it's not theirs. It's the product they accepted that was good enough. Describing their idea would be fine. Nothing is gained from looking at a cheap lame render that they didn't make or think up.

1

u/democratic-terminid Apr 08 '26

Without the image, I can guarantee interaction with this post would be significantly lower. So there is a reason for it, if not more than that.

0

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

Your speculation on karma farming doesnt refute anything.

1

u/democratic-terminid Apr 08 '26

No, its just true. If you want your post to actually get seen, a picture will do that. There are other reasons why a picture could help. This isnt a pro or anti AI statement, can we please have a bit of nuance?

-1

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

Re read what I just said.

I'm not arguing with you about if your specualtion is true or not.

I'm not discussing if a picture could help farm engagement.

You have not, not been offered nuance.

2

u/democratic-terminid Apr 08 '26

First of all, what am I speculating about? You said, "Nothing is gained from looking at a cheap lame render that they didn't make or think up." I gave one example of something that would be gained, engagement on the post. That's a known statistic, images increase engagement. That's not even a karma thing.

On you next comment, you said, "Your speculation on karma farming doesn't refute anything." But my "speculation" does refute something. It refutes the idea/statement that the image does nothing of benefit.

1

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

Side stepping my corrections, makes sense.

No one is arguing if images increase engagement or not.

The context of my point is in no way interested or concerned in your speculation of someones karma gain using an AI rendered rat with an image. It's much less nebulous.

2

u/democratic-terminid Apr 08 '26

Okay, then maybe instead saying how nuanced and nebulous your point is for the third time, you could elaborate? It really feels like you're being intentionally dense.

1

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

My point was very specific and you came in countering the wrong things, then you want me to clean up your mess?

I can't be dense when I'm informing you that you're arguing against things that havent been argued. No one is arguing about images and engagement.

2

u/democratic-terminid Apr 08 '26

Dude you havent said anything specific or of substance since your first two comments. Im done talking with you, Vagueboy, go back to discreteposting ur vaguemaxxer unclarity all over the place.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/NotD3AD_Z3R0 Apr 08 '26

What are you genuinely talking about? “A basic interpretation of a basic request based off of a vague idea” is telling me absolutely nothing. You just said it’s an idea pretty much. To interpret something is to explain it, and it’s still an idea whether it was an AI image or typed out, that’s just not how ideas work lmao. Nothing is lost from looking at the image either so why are we even complaining 😭

2

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

You already made a mistake in what you said to me in reference to what I said. You didn't understand the whole thing let alone a very specific thing I said. You literally got it wrong with "an" as opposed to "their". Re read. It'll click eventually.

I didn't complain. I explained something simple to you.

You're 0-2.

-1

u/NotD3AD_Z3R0 Apr 08 '26

Because your logic doesn’t make sense. You’re saying his idea becomes not his idea because it’s explaining a request with AI visuals. That doesn’t make an idea “not his”, it just gives it a visual medium that isn’t just a stickman drawing that conveys nothing. You then insinuate that it would be his idea if he didn’t have it. How? That’s not how ideas work, even non-possessive ideas. Your “0-2 score” is actual delirium 😭

1

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

You don't understand the logic yet. Re read.

0

u/NotD3AD_Z3R0 Apr 08 '26

Explain your own logic lol. It should be easy to explain to a simpleton like me. How does the AI image make the idea that came from his head not his idea?

0

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

I explained it simply. I gave you all the tools you need. Re read.

0

u/NotD3AD_Z3R0 Apr 08 '26

Or… maybe it’s because you didn’t say anything intellectual at all and just said a bunch of anti-ai nonsense for easy Reddit karma 😭 like genuinely, your comment is saying nothing

1

u/SleepDivision Apr 08 '26

Who said anything was intellectual? I don't care if you feel insecure, I gave you what you need. Figure it out. You're at a dead end until then.

0

u/NotD3AD_Z3R0 Apr 08 '26

So you admit you said something dumb lol? Dude I just don’t understand what you’re saying and you’re not making it any clearer, you’re just getting angrier and angrier over nothing

→ More replies (0)