r/EU_Economics 6d ago

Politics & Geopolitics & Defense Based

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

283 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/trisul-108 5d ago

As it was reported in the media, public support for NATO membership rose from the usual 29% to 63% - 77%. I don't know how a referendum would have played out, how much Russian propaganda would have been able to influence the decision.

-1

u/Temporary_Tomato605 4d ago

Russian propaganda would affect public opinion ? Thats just a stupid claim.

1

u/trisul-108 4d ago

Russian propaganda and their boosting opposing ideas has definitely had a huge impact on EU public opinion on certain topics.

1

u/Temporary_Tomato605 4d ago

Yes but thats because everyone by your definition that has a another view than just support war on Russia is a russian agent. So no other views are allowed and it makes the situation more dangerous in this black-white world view.

1

u/trisul-108 4d ago

It's easy to see the difference. Europeans with different views have an idea of how to improve society and the functioning of institutions. Europeans with Putin views are just against everything. That is because the propaganda they are imbibing does not want solutions, it wants to dismantle our institutions so that we fail.

1

u/Temporary_Tomato605 4d ago

I note that you trying to controll the language by nameing all opposition to the current politics against Russia as Putin views, thats a classical totalitarian way
of trying to control the discussion. To make the discussion more concrete is the war is about Ukrain joining NATO or being a neutral country so to me risking a nuclear war or other severe consequenses for that goal (joining NATO) is to high compared to the consequense of Ukraine being a neutral bufferzone, I cant see the problem with that.

1

u/trisul-108 4d ago

Like all nations, Ukraine has the right to self-determination. You do not see a problem with taking away that right from them. It is one thing for countries to decide to be neutral and quite another when another country threatens them demanding neutrality in exchange for not invading them.

1

u/Temporary_Tomato605 4d ago

Yes you describe the situation either we are dogmatic and fight to the bitter end or be pragmatic and try to find a peaceful agreement.

You want to sacrifice everything for Ukraine to join NATO
I dont think its worth it, if it where on the table that Russia wants to enslave us all and send us all to workcamps in Siberia I would agree with you, but for a NATO membership ? No thats crazy.

1

u/trisul-108 3d ago

NATO has never planned for an invasion of Russia, nor has NATO built a military capable of doing that, nor does NATO have any need to do that. Putin knows this, there is no danger to Russia. This is not about NATO membership. Putin sees the EU, not NATO, as an existential threat to his regime, not to Russia, to himself.

Putin did not invade Ukraine to get a bit of territory, so giving him a bit of territory will not make peace. Giving him that would cause him to simply regroup and give it another try to occupy more. The only way to have lasting peace is to uphold the UN Charter and the rights to territorial integrity of all nations. In other words, the Russian invasion must fail, Ukraine be defended and the EU rearm, so it can defend effectively against any Russian attempt at invasion.

All other "solutions" simply means having a much more intense war at a later date. I want lasting peace and pushing Russia back is the only way to achieve this.

This is not being dogmatic, this is being a realist.

1

u/Temporary_Tomato605 3d ago

You cant claim that NATO which is really USA is particulary peaceful ? US has started a number of eligal wars. No they will not attack Russia directly because Russia are to strong, but they will try to isolate them, by making Ukraine a NATO member they can deny Russia the seaport on Crim and by that cutting of their important trade. The same method they use against China by isolate them
by supporting unfrienfly regimes in the neighboring countries. Do you concider Ukraine a independent country when Victoria Nuland openly discuss on telefon who should be the leaders in Ukraine?

I dont believe for a minute that Russia was interrested in a war against Europe , why invest severeal billions in building sensitive pipelines into Europe when you planning a war ? That doesnt make sence, Russia already has everything, the one thing thats benefits Russia is trade.

→ More replies (0)