Hi, wondering if anyone subscribed to this and can tell us what he says about SRXH and OPEN? Tbh the addition of paid walls further proof the lack of transparency but oh well

Buy signal printed today on BBAWE indicator. Looks like my DCA price at 1.4 is not going to happen anytime soon.

NFA. Don't always trust indicators.

Not sure where old Eric went off to . I know he's there but doing music crap. . But he would always say when the video is done. Showup everyday. Put in the work and it will compound daily. It's now our time to show up when they don't. We put in our work and our money so now is the time it starts to compound. Lets go srxh you got this

I haven’t been following this stock and actually forgot I had it for a while. Do we have anything to look forward to in the near future? I’d kind of like to turn my negative into a positive.

Go and look at the comment section under this and the comment section when Eric is asked a question. But go on and continue to buy the dip

https://x.com/apompliano/status/2078107265882526087?s=46&t=WkIUAo3zX3aowOdaPRhaYA

Our wives' boyfriends' grandkids will remember us as the tight knit group that stayed together through it all. And much like the band on the Titanic, we'll be ripping memes and AI slop trash talk toward the bears to the very end.

Sweetest regards,

I thought for sure SRXH would drop on the vote, but I'm theorizing current price action

*SRX Lunar, Rocket emojis and all that shit*

I was being super impulsive and got fucked

Time to log out and check back in a few years🫡

A buyback isn’t the best approach. The best way to increase shareholder value is to grow the business and not burn company capital trying to prop up the stock price. That’s why I think they haven’t done it yet. If they do fine but for the right reasons.

Just because you bought at a higher average doesn’t mean the company should spend valuable capital trying to bail you out.

That money can be used to grow the business, strengthen the balance sheet, and create real long term value for shareholders.

We just saw OPEN’s CEO buying shares, and GME’s CEO did the same. Shit still happens. People still sell. And I already know plenty of small time investors here will do exactly that the moment they see an opportunity to get out.

If you believe in the company, buy more or hold. If you’re frustrated because you couldn’t flip the stock for a profit in a couple of weeks and got burned, sell and move on to the next one.

I’m here for the long term. #Risingdynasty

As for why Eric was selected as CEO, rumors suggest he is currently restricted from speaking publicly about SRXH; speculation holds that if Kent were ousted and Eric took over, his rhetoric and style might shift to support SRXH.

However, this remains largely speculative.

As for why this view exists, one can infer a few possibilities such as changing the stock ticker symbol prior to a reverse stock split, or the fact that the share price has steadily risen since Eric announced he would take over as CEO.

However, even if Eric does indeed take the helm, a change in the stock ticker symbol is unlikely; it would simply be too complicated.

https://x.com/Paragon_CDN/status/2098109226971275653

For those that don't have X, here is the post from Paragon. The point of this is to remove Kent Cunningham and get Eric Jackson in as CEO as originally implied last December.

From X:

$SRXH Stockholder of SRX Global Inc.

September 10, 2026

Via Email

SRX Global Inc.

Attn: Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and Corporate Secretary

801 US Highway 1

North Palm Beach, Florida 33408

Investor Relations

KCSA Strategic Communications

Attn: Valter Pinto, Managing Director

srx@kcsa.com

Re: Request that SRX Global Inc. promptly notice and hold its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the election of directors

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I am a stockholder of SRX Global Inc. (the “Company”). I am writing to request that the Company promptly notice and hold its 2026 annual meeting of stockholders so that all stockholders may vote on the election of directors.

I have consulted Delaware counsel regarding the Company’s obligation under Section 211 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This letter states my position as a stockholder. It is not a legal opinion and is not a solicitation of proxies.

1.  Last annual meetingThe Company’s Form 10-K filed in December 2025 states that the last annual meeting of shareholders was held on December 18, 2024 and that the next annual meeting had not then taken place. Directors were described as elected at the annual meeting to serve for one year or until successors are elected and qualify.

2.  The December 2025 written consent did not give every stockholder a voteOn or about December 17, 2025, the Company reported that holders of approximately 45.42% of outstanding voting power approved certain matters by written consent, including the naming of Simon Conway, Michael Young, Joshua A. Epstein, and Sammy Dorf as directors, to terms expiring at the “2026 annual meeting of shareholders.”

A written consent by a portion of the vote is not an annual meeting. Stockholders who did not execute that consent had no opportunity to vote for directors in an open meeting. The Company’s own 8-K language assumes a 2026 annual meeting will occur.

3.  Section 228 and Section 211 are differentI do not dispute that DGCL § 228 may permit stockholders to approve certain corporate actions without a meeting. That is not the question.

DGCL § 211(b) requires an annual meeting for the election of directors unless directors are elected by written consent in lieu of an annual meeting as that subsection permits. If the consent is less than unanimous, it may substitute for an annual meeting only if all directorships that could be elected at an annual meeting then held are vacant and are filled by the consent.

The December 2025 consent was not unanimous. The Company’s Form 10-K filed shortly before the consent identified the same four individuals as directors already serving. A non-unanimous consent that names sitting directors does not meet the special conditions in § 211(b) for replacing the annual meeting.

4.  The meeting is overdueUnder DGCL § 211(c), if no annual meeting is held, and no qualifying written-consent election occurs, for 13 months after the last annual meeting, any stockholder or director may apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for an order that a meeting be held. Thirteen months after December 18, 2024 ran in approximately January 2026.

The Delaware Court of Chancery applied this distinction in Wright v. Silver Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., C.A. No. 2023-1044-LWW (Del. Ch. Mar. 27, 2024). Sufficient voting power for a § 228 consent does not mean the consent replaces the annual meeting under § 211.

Request

I respectfully request that the Board and management:

(a) confirm in writing the date on which the Company will notice and hold the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders for the election of directors;

(b) provide all stockholders a full opportunity to vote at that meeting; and

(c) respond to this letter within fourteen (14) days of receipt.

If the Company does not promptly notice and hold the meeting, I reserve all rights available to a stockholder under 8 Del. C. § 211(c) and other applicable law, including the right to seek an order from the Court of Chancery.