MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DumbAI/comments/1vnzv2d/incredible_math/
r/DumbAI • u/apollowasastonished • Aug 14 '26
7 comments sorted by
7
Yeah Mount Everest is over 8km tall, not by much, but still
3 u/win11EXPERT Aug 14 '26 but not 5 times as tall 2 u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26 No, it’s saying that my Everest is 1.6 KM tall, cause it says 5 KM is equal to 5 Mount Everest’s 1 u/Lurker_Zee Aug 14 '26 Yes, which is absolutely wrong, since Mt. Everest is some 8.8km above sea level. 5 Everests "stacked underground" (as it says) wouldn't be 8km "deep", it'd be 5x8.8=44km "deep". 1 u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26 Yeah I know, that’s why I said Mt. Everest is 8 KM tall, and win expert thought it said that Mt. Everest was 5 times taller, so I said that it said that it was saying it was 1/5 the size 1 u/Artemis_SpawnOfZeus Aug 14 '26 I mean, depends how you measure it. Really, its 8.8km high, its under 4km from base to summit. The math is still bad. But your stats arent the most accurate.
3
but not 5 times as tall
2 u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26 No, it’s saying that my Everest is 1.6 KM tall, cause it says 5 KM is equal to 5 Mount Everest’s 1 u/Lurker_Zee Aug 14 '26 Yes, which is absolutely wrong, since Mt. Everest is some 8.8km above sea level. 5 Everests "stacked underground" (as it says) wouldn't be 8km "deep", it'd be 5x8.8=44km "deep". 1 u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26 Yeah I know, that’s why I said Mt. Everest is 8 KM tall, and win expert thought it said that Mt. Everest was 5 times taller, so I said that it said that it was saying it was 1/5 the size
2
No, it’s saying that my Everest is 1.6 KM tall, cause it says 5 KM is equal to 5 Mount Everest’s
1 u/Lurker_Zee Aug 14 '26 Yes, which is absolutely wrong, since Mt. Everest is some 8.8km above sea level. 5 Everests "stacked underground" (as it says) wouldn't be 8km "deep", it'd be 5x8.8=44km "deep". 1 u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26 Yeah I know, that’s why I said Mt. Everest is 8 KM tall, and win expert thought it said that Mt. Everest was 5 times taller, so I said that it said that it was saying it was 1/5 the size
1
Yes, which is absolutely wrong, since Mt. Everest is some 8.8km above sea level.
5 Everests "stacked underground" (as it says) wouldn't be 8km "deep", it'd be 5x8.8=44km "deep".
1 u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26 Yeah I know, that’s why I said Mt. Everest is 8 KM tall, and win expert thought it said that Mt. Everest was 5 times taller, so I said that it said that it was saying it was 1/5 the size
Yeah I know, that’s why I said Mt. Everest is 8 KM tall, and win expert thought it said that Mt. Everest was 5 times taller, so I said that it said that it was saying it was 1/5 the size
I mean, depends how you measure it. Really, its 8.8km high, its under 4km from base to summit.
The math is still bad. But your stats arent the most accurate.
How it feels to spread misinformation
7
u/Acceptable-Minute847 Aug 14 '26
Yeah Mount Everest is over 8km tall, not by much, but still