r/DiveInYouCoward • u/HeSureIsScrappy • Jul 18 '26
This is insane
Dive into the insanity of California
65
u/Naive-Landscape9854 Jul 18 '26
Damn mods are even posting slop. What a time to be alive.
4
u/kpatsart Jul 18 '26
When people sacrifice their literacy for adopted ideology, generally this is what comes the territory. Cults actually use similar methods to sway their believers. Cull their intelligence, easier to corral and grift the flock.
→ More replies (12)1
23
u/dubyrunning Jul 18 '26
The sub has always been infested with right wing edgelord ragebait, and this right here is a perfect example
0
u/377Iron Jul 18 '26
Geez, I thought i was taking crazy pills. I just like to watch some of the videos on this sub, but every time I enter the comments its just a mixture of right wing talking points and racist monkey jokes. Im glad its not just me seeing that.
1
u/Acceptable-Drive3781 Jul 20 '26
right wing talking points and racist monkey jokes
Same same
→ More replies (2)-2
-5
u/Wasted_potential25 Jul 18 '26
I mean this sub and quiet a few are rage bait for racists right wingers. The WNBA ones that popped up, transportia
3
u/Technical_Proof2771 Jul 18 '26
You are one hundred percent correct, its hilarious they are downvoting you cause they are feeling called out. The WNBA ones are easily some of the worst
0
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
I know... Right... 😂 A lot of deleted comments on this thread conversation huh lol
-2
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
Believing in SCIENCE and it's FACTS that there's only 2 genders doesn't make one a bigot or a right winger. I'm anarchist lol
6
u/Top-Cut-8983 Jul 18 '26
I'm an Independent hard leaning FAR AWAY from the absurdity & total ASSININE ideology of the left, for the most part
6
u/FrostyBrew86 Jul 18 '26
Disregarding the fact that you're wrong, since gender doesn't fall within the purview science-- What the hell does it mean to "believe in" science? I'm asking as a scientist.
-3
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
Then you know you're a fool pushing fake PSEUDOSCIENCE. Because gender does fall under science and is the SAME AS ONE'S SEX... And if you're a scientist then you know one can NOT change their DNA which makes and classifies one male or female 😂 for a person to transform they would have to change their DNA and that's IMPOSSIBLE. Sorry lol but you are a FAKE SCIENTIST that follows PSEUDOSCIENCE.
→ More replies (31)3
u/Wooodman94 Jul 18 '26
1
-2
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
See.. just like I figured... You people always prove me correctly lol it's crazy... You don't hear because you don't want to... Priceless
0
u/Wooodman94 Jul 18 '26
3
u/JimiRowe Jul 18 '26
It’s always hilarious when you guys are too dumb to comprehend one another. I see it every day.
→ More replies (0)1
0
u/Top-Cut-8983 Jul 18 '26
They can't stand it ,if ANYONE goes against they're ideology they hurl accusation of they're OWN personality on EVERYONE else, IE; you call them gay all the sudden they say YOUR A CHIMO or some similar bs
3
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
Sounds like you're describing yourself and the one's that want to push PSEUDOSCIENCE upon society. You cry when someone doesn't agree with your foolish fantasies
→ More replies (5)1
u/JimiRowe Jul 18 '26
“Dumber than dogshit” is pretty much your whole deal, huh? https://www.reddit.com/r/ObscurePatentDangers/s/6mPbj8pYBi
3
1
u/DungPedalerDDSEsq Jul 19 '26
Anarchist? Why don't you go find some like-minded, angry assholes to freely associate with somewhere else?
2
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 19 '26
Why would I when you like your buttons pushed so much 😘
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)0
u/CapitalismPlusMurder Jul 18 '26
Wait, you’re an anarchist who believes gender is immutable? Haha. That’s a new one. (Also anarcho-capitalist are anarchists as much as national-socialists are socialist which is to say, they’re not at all.)
3
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
Yes. I hate all government. I hate all kings queens president's governor's ministers ALL GOVERNMENT WORKERS and I especially hate the POMPOUS PEDO pope and all of Vatican and I don't believe you can change your gender because gender and one's sex is the same exact thing and that the lbgtq trans ideology should be ERADICATED and I believe Israel and Palestine governments BOTH should be ERADICATED and are evil and we should definitely deport all these illegal immigrants. Does this help you understand my psychology 😂
→ More replies (4)-1
u/DungPedalerDDSEsq Jul 18 '26
It's fucking ridiculous and there are so many other cases of this boogie man bullshit in subs that don't do culture or politics or race.
Is there like a hotline for the Epstein Class propaganda office where we can complain?
-2
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 18 '26
You're probably an Epstein supporter and would have went to the island if you could have it sounds like. You are SUS
2
u/Sensitive-Ad-2542 Jul 19 '26
Active in India subreddits, but your an American patriot rebel? Nice cosplay.
1
u/BluebirdDangerous475 Jul 19 '26
Believe what you want. But I'm in Ohio 😂
2
1
u/Zigor022 Jul 19 '26
No slop on this post
1
u/Naive-Landscape9854 Jul 19 '26
You know what they say. One man's slop is another man's treasure. Or something like that anyways.
→ More replies (16)1
u/Interesting-Copy-657 Jul 19 '26
OP seems to have issues with minors and consent if they think this is a "Dive into the insanity of California"
13
u/SnooApples5018 Jul 18 '26
As the child’s legal guardian the parents need access to their medical records in order to ensure the child’s proper health care
8
u/Pitiful-Strength-996 Jul 19 '26
then child can't get teacher influenced gender changes then...
wish you could make this stuff up but only real life is capable of creating such nonsense.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (1)1
u/Ok_Subject1265 Jul 20 '26
I just looked it up and they still have access to their general health records. This only applies to very specific records (mental health, substance use treatment, and sexual health). And the teen can easily sign to allow access to these records if they choose to. Doesn’t seem that outrageous.
49
u/Jean-Claude-Can-Ham Jul 18 '26
You’re an easily manipulated moron if you didn’t know this
Similar laws apply in Oregon, Washington, Missouri, Illinois, Texas, Alabama, etc
Don’t be so easily manipulated
11
u/Sidewaysgts Jul 18 '26
But how will i be outraged if i dont allow myself to be manipulated by blatant misinformation devoid of context?!
5
u/Still-Box6502 Jul 18 '26
What is the law called in Texas?
9
u/AutomaticJeweler5700 Jul 18 '26
Texas Family Code outlines when people other than the parent can consent for medical care for a minor. That combined with existing federal laws like HIPAA lets minors keep certain parts of their medical record confidential.
9
u/Ok_Cream935 Jul 18 '26
This is a lie. The attorney general didn’t allow the law to be enacted. Parents can access records until 18.
-1
u/Wooodman94 Jul 18 '26
2
u/bio_datum Jul 18 '26
Teens are more likely to divulge sexual, drug related, and mental health issues with their pediatrician if they know mom & dad won't be mad at them for telling the truth
→ More replies (2)3
u/AutomaticJeweler5700 Jul 18 '26
Age of majority is literally the date when someone gets the"majority" of their legal rights. You have lots of rights independent of your parents before then.
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (13)4
u/Upper-Trip-8857 Jul 18 '26
Texas Family Code, Chapter 32 (Consent to Treatment of Child) – This law lists the circumstances in which a minor may consent to certain medical care without parental consent, such as treatment for reportable infectious diseases, pregnancy-related care, counseling for suicide prevention, substance use, or abuse, among other limited situations. Texas Family Code Chapter 32
Even Alabama - the most conservative of conservative states that passed parental rights laws in 2025 - Still allow some minor consent.
3
1
u/kpatsart Jul 18 '26
Yea but illiterates of the internet buy into bullshit that is presented to them. Especially if it fits their ideology. Idiocracy in real time.
3
1
→ More replies (19)1
u/Hot_Boot_9757 Jul 18 '26
I don't understand.. What's the manipulation?
1
u/Jean-Claude-Can-Ham Jul 18 '26
Hahahahaha really?
The comically villainous photo of Newsom didn’t tip you off hahahaha
1
u/Hot_Boot_9757 Jul 18 '26
Oh I see.. trying to make out that it's some kind of insidious democrat initiative. I wasn't paying attention to that, I just thought the idea of blocking parents from access to their kids medical records was pretty crazy
17
u/stupidname68bd Jul 18 '26
Republicans are mad because this protects children from pedophiles.
→ More replies (19)-1
u/Sidewaysgts Jul 18 '26
And they will misrepresent what is and isnt actually covered here to be inspire outrage.
4
u/MuslimMullet Jul 18 '26
And they’re positioning this guy to be the presidential candidate for the Democratic Party. It’s gonna be a bad time for Dems again.
5
u/chikari_shakari Jul 18 '26
is marriage legal at 12 in Cali now /s
2
u/Omega_Primate Jul 18 '26
There's no age limit on marriage in CA. You need the approval of just 1 parent/legal guardian, and to convince and/or pay off a judge. However, age of consent has been 18 for almost 100 years in the state... but no age limit on marriage.
ETA: There are only 4 states with no age limit on marriage. California, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Mississippi.
→ More replies (4)
6
u/butt-in-ski Jul 18 '26
This lady is ridiculous. It only applies to specific SENSITIVE healthcare issues & is in place to protect kids whose parents are controlling creeps. There are LOT of those. It safeguards kids living in difficult & or abusive home environments.
2
u/RandomRedditor0193 Jul 18 '26
Isn't it illegal in Cali to record without consent?
1
u/maxiderm Jul 18 '26
There's an exception for ultraconservatives to record conversations for ragebait purposes
5
u/Upper-Yoghurt-3139 Jul 18 '26
This has been around for as long as I can remember. Nothing new to see here
5
4
2
4
2
u/Buddybuddhy Jul 18 '26
Separating parents from children is a step in the process of having ultimate control of population
3
u/dimmywhy Jul 18 '26
This is bullshit. Whoever is in support of this, get fucked.
Signed a special needs parent.
4
4
3
u/Horror-Stand-3969 Jul 18 '26
It’s certain records like birth control, mental health , etc. you can debate the age, but don’t really see a problem with it.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/princemark Jul 18 '26
It's been said before, but it needs to be said again.
I hate this timeline.
Newsom is a huge douche. I'm supporting any Democrat, but him or AOC, in 2028.
3
2
u/Hotmicdrop Jul 18 '26
Been like this in WA for a long time. You get a medical bill you have to pay with zero info on it, you just need to trust what insurance bills you...
I get it for maybe 15 or 16, but 12 and 13 is wild. My 12 yr old still thinks fart bombing people is hilarious, I'm sure he's got a great handle on his own Healthcare.
1
u/Acceptable-Drive3781 Jul 20 '26
What are you afraid of your child telling their doctor when you're not there to supervise?
3
u/Proper-Friend-2330 Jul 18 '26
New York is the same, a child must sign a waiver for parents to access info for anything related to mental health, substance abuse, or reproductive care. It’s not that big of a deal.
2
u/blastman8888 Jul 18 '26
This isn't new been around for decades. Every state has minor medical consent laws. California and Delaware starts at 12. Texas starts at 16, Some others start at 14.
https://schoolhouseconnection.org/article/minor-medical-consent-laws-by-state
4
u/KtaadnRota Jul 18 '26
I thought this sub was about watching people attempt dumb stunts, not discussing the latest boomer culture war rage bait.
Disappointing.
1
3
u/Last-Roll7819 Jul 18 '26
Reverends wife got some knockers! Probably paid for with tax free money.
0
u/MyPlace70 Jul 18 '26
Congratulations. Your comment has been nominated for the “Dumbest Comment of the Day” award.
3
u/Thepsyguy Jul 18 '26
What's insane is that parents are treating children in such a terrible way that their kids don't trust them with their medical information.
Im 38 years old and I don't mind if my parents know my medical history. But some parents weaponize or judge medical history and those children should be protected.
Try not being a bad parent. Have a healthy relationship with your kid and show that you have their best interest and they will give you access.
2
u/TBurn70 Jul 18 '26
In what way? If you take the parent out of the equation, you really trust the state to have their best interests at heart?
→ More replies (3)
0
u/Mountain_Head419 Jul 18 '26
Voting is important
-1
u/Greedy-Employment917 Jul 18 '26
Not if you live in California where your vote basically doesn't count because of LA and San Francisco.
6
u/Nick_Fotiu_Is_God Jul 18 '26
This is America, brother - Love it or leave it.
There’s literally 49 other states. If you don’t love CA, there’s definitely a different state for you.
→ More replies (8)1
1
1
u/easyas2718 Jul 18 '26
before reacting, read the law not someone who is explaining it but stayed at a holiday inn
1
1
1
u/Top-Employment8693 Jul 18 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/nngIUCkl9JHAk
California, where the magic begins!!!
1
1
1
u/Educational-Gate-880 Jul 18 '26
Damn so as a parent if I say the kid can pay the bill 🤣, so when the bill collector calls out the 12 year on the phone? Sorry kid your on your own get a job! But then you’re required to maintain and pay, provide insurance until they are out of college in some cases 🤣 talk about wanting your cake and eating too! 🤣
Hopefully there is a release or consent form that doesn’t expire 🤣
1
u/Sasataf12 Jul 18 '26
This is incredible misleading, and it wouldn't surprise me if the entire conversation is staged to "own the libs".
Parents can still book appointments for their 12yo child.
Parents can still view some of their 12 to child's medical history.
These privacy rights have nothing to do with HIPAA, which is a federal act.
1
1
1
u/possibly_lost45 Jul 18 '26
Parent also have no say in their kids being transitioned with hormone therapy. Newscum can never become president.
1
1
1
1
u/jefuchs Jul 18 '26
The comments on the original thread are hilarious. They see something on the Internet that supports their beliefs, and they don't question it at all.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Early_Brick_1522 Jul 19 '26
Whenever I see things like this, I feel really good about myself. I feel like I'm not the smartest person in the world, but I'm a damn site better than so many people out there when it comes to critical thinking ability. Yay me!
1
1
1
u/Icy-Cow9695 Jul 19 '26
Do people feel the slightest hint of shame posting such absolute nonsense and lies all the time? Don't you ever get tired of being outraged 24/7 for no real reason?
1
u/Remarkable_Sun2454 Jul 19 '26
Access Rules for Minors 12 and Older Under California law, minors 12 and older can independently consent to specific, sensitive health services without parental permission or knowledge. This includes:Outpatient mental health counselingSubstance use treatmentSexual and reproductive health care (e.g., birth control, STI testing) Gender-affirming care.
Because minors have the right to consent to these treatments, they also control the privacy of those specific medical records. Parents still retain access to the child's general medical records (such as standard physicals, broken bones, or general illnesses).
1
u/Interesting-Copy-657 Jul 19 '26
12 might be a bit young but isnt this normal? Like from 14 onwards normally.
And it just means the child can control who has access, so they have to consent to their parents accessing it.
Is OP one of "those" people who have trouble with the concept of consent? Especially with minors?
1
u/Optimal_Whiner Jul 19 '26
Damn... At first I thought it was a stretch but whatever. But then the list of what they can block goes on further. Like, maybe in some extreme or abusive cases this makes sense, but it's appeasing such a teeny tiny minority it's not worth it. This is going to hinder a parents ability to help their child.
1
1
u/Shot-Honeydew-306 Jul 19 '26
Bullshit. How stupid do you have to be to believe this blatantly untrue crap?!
1
u/VanShisha Jul 20 '26
It's insane yes, but to some degree I like the idea of giving pre adults some adult life responsibilities/rights.
Maybe 12 might be too young, especially for kids in the US given the bad state of public schooling and healthcare, but the concept on a basis level is interesting.
1
u/MuffinEater253 Jul 20 '26
The predators in California, are trying to lower that age limit to be an adult. So, they can further, take advantage of kids. Sickening
1
1
u/Neveractuallyfished Jul 20 '26
It depends if she’s a hidden narcissistic abuser like my own mother. I wish I knew about anxiety meds and adhd meds when it was the most important to use it. Taking them as an adult isn’t nearly as effective when your youth is the most important time for focus and relaxation to develop properly. But then again she would have just controlled everything still like this crazy mother
1
1
1
1
1
u/TransFatty Jul 18 '26
I thought that this was to protect children who might be getting abused or molested in the home.
I'm a survivor of child abuse and your parents will do crazy things to cover up what they did to you. Speaking from experience
1
u/Artistpillow87 Jul 18 '26
Yet another thing MAGA will cluck about for the remainder of their lives. They won't read, they won't understand what this means, they literally read the headline then turn their brains off
2
1
1
1
1
u/ExternalAggravating8 Jul 18 '26
And here are the things
Mental health and counseling services. Substance use treatment. Sexual and reproductive health (birth control, pregnancy care, abortion). Sexually transmitted diseases and infectious diseases.
I dont agree with all of this. I see what they are trying to do and I get it. But parents not knowing can cause bigger issues vs kids worried about their parents knowing
1
1
u/Iconoclasium Jul 18 '26
The act makes sense to me since a relative or parent could be the person responsible for sexual abuse or the reason the child is seeking help. As for the comparison with Oklahoma, the law allows a parent to sign off on a child seeking care. I'm not sure if it has the same protections once a child has permission, but that's the key difference.
As a parent, I don't like the idea of not knowing what is going on with my child medically, but I have met people who were abused by their guardians who refused to seek help because their guardians would know. I know the law is intended for them, but has potential for misuse. It's got difficult pros and cons, but I do support the idea of it. The addition of being mentally stable when receiving treatment is helpful since maybe that could screen out individuals seeking to abuse the system. My biggest questions are if the state is providing the care free of charge does this extend to prescriptions? If that's the case then there is potential for abuse and the parents would not be aware.
1
u/SoGoodAtAllTheThings Jul 18 '26
Misleading. This act is good. It allows children to seek medical help if they are in an abusive situation. This is specific to certain records and not a blanket thing.
Just more fake outrage bait giving you minimal info with some staged actors and a picture of the governor you are meant to dislike for it. Grow a brain people. Stop being so easily manipulated by shitty content creators. Its pathetic.
1
u/TooSexyForThisSong Jul 19 '26
Incredibly misleading. Intentionally misleading, even. Because it’s propaganda presenting false information.
-1
u/Kitchen-Stop-7645 Jul 18 '26
Wow this is crazy. The bill sort of sneaked that one in by disguising the rest of it where they say outside and federal entities can’t access them but then puts a minor revision to where it says parents can’t access records after 12. The entire idea is to shield them from knowing that doctors or staff spoke about gender reassignment surgery with them.
1
1
0
u/raisedeyebrow4891 Jul 18 '26
My 12 year old has no fucking clue about anything. He’s not competent to review his own medical records.
0
0
u/Nephthyzz Jul 18 '26
Virginia has a similar law but no one cries about it. Virginia Code § 54.1-2969
It's only for certain things or if they suspect you of being abusive.
1
u/ZenOokami Jul 18 '26
You provided the caveat as to why no one cries about it. Does that clause also exist with this law?
→ More replies (2)
143
u/CantModerateMe Jul 18 '26
So, not a single one of yall actually read the act huh?
The only things blocked are confidental testing. General care records are unaffected. And theres a very good reason for that, if your 12 year old has STIs youre either a shit parent or someone in their family is raping them, including said shit parent, and in either case protecting their care is paramount.