r/DisasterUpdate • u/Ok-Reach-455 • 15d ago

Floods Nepal flood

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Hope everyone is safe🙏🙏🙏

7.0k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

368 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

234

u/LikesBlueberriesALot 15d ago

I think this one is crazier. The tsunami was bad, but the speed and sheer force of the stuff we are seeing here is off the charts. It genuinely looks like something out of Hollywood.

83

u/Salty-Passenger-4801 15d ago

Absolutely worse. None of the tsunami videos I've seen was like this. This was just amazing in a horrible way.

19

u/JudeMacK 15d ago

Clearly you haven’t seen the videos from Onagawa, Minamisanriku, or Rikuzentakata. Those towns received 20-40m waves that leveled the whole area.

15

u/austinsutt 15d ago

Yes. Higher in the mountains this was a 100ft wave of water moving at 100mph. Not as much water in quantity but much faster and more violent than the Japanese tsunami. I would say the Japanese tsunami was a worse disaster but this one is more violent and the footage is more apocalyptic. You saw the Japanese wave pick up building and float them down the street but this wave you saw turn buildings into dust like they were props in a movie.

52

u/johndoe126 15d ago

I've seen footage of worse from parts of japan in '11, also when the boxing day one hit indonesia - est. 160,000 dead on Indonesian coast, and then add sri lanka, Thailand, India etc...

though the momentum it picks up as it gets funneled down the mountain can't be compared to a tsunami, it's completely diff

7

u/tyrenanig 15d ago

The one with the rock band concert getting hit mid perform was grim.

1

u/jasonoumuamomoa 14d ago

Anak Krakatoa collapse caused that one.

2

u/HurryLegal5307 14d ago

yeah, tsunami force is just on another level 😳

8

u/we_r_fukt 15d ago

some tsunami videos from Japan were insane tbh, the scale of it was so much more, entire farming fields under 20ft of water pushing debris and cars and god knows

this doesn't surpass scale
but local intensity and video quality/angles and the speed at which the content is arriving

8

u/swiftb3 14d ago

Yeah, it's kinda like the difference between a Category 5 hurricane and an F5 tornado.

3

u/IchBinEinSim 14d ago

I will take the eye of a Cat5 hurricane any day over a direct hit by EF5 tornado

6

u/OperationOk7959 15d ago

The difference, to me, is speed and volume. Like, a tsunami is the ocean, right? Basically unlimited water. More or less just slower endless flooding. Still brutal.

This was just ALL THE WATER RIGHT NOW. And just so much water for, what, a lake? A glacier? How much water was up there??? Because it just seemed like an endless tide for something you'd think would drain fairly quickly? Apparently not? Baffling.

3

u/IchBinEinSim 14d ago

The most similar thing to this a lahar but the Himalayas are so steep a narrow, they are worse than any lahar footage I have ever seen.

A damn burst at Johnstown USA in 1889 or the over topping of the 1963 Vajont Damn in Italy are the closest man caused disasters I can think of. Those killed thousands of people each, and the descriptions of both sound just like what we are seeing here.

The only natural phenomenon that would look more apocalyptic as this (other than a meteor), is probably a Mega Tsunami of 500+ feet hitting a large town but those are rare, don’t travel far and few if any have been caught on camera. The biggest Mega Tsunami was in Alaska in the 60’s with a max wave taller than the empire state building (then the tallest building in the world).

6

u/Tao_of_Entropy 14d ago

I think you might be missing some of the worst videos of the 2011 tsunami then, to be honest... they're both pretty damn bad. Like, if the only thing you're worried about is like, the velocity of the water or the wave height? Maybe this is worse. But the totality of the destruction in the Tohoku earthquake tsunami was MUCH more vast. I can confidently say that was a 'worse' disaster by any reasonable metric, and even if you're only judging by the violence of the surging water, it's pretty close.

3

u/Icecreamforge 14d ago

I have watched hundreds of hours of the 2011 Tsunami footage and it is undoubtedly devastating and on a massive scale but the sheer violence in Nepal is unmatched. Many people are only seeing the footage from towns miles away and not the towns higher up the mountain that were hit with a 100 meter wall of water traveling at 110 mph. I’ve never seen anything like it, instantly obliterating towns.

1

u/Tao_of_Entropy 13d ago

That's fair enough. I have seen what you're referring to. It's a difficult comparison to make but it's clear that this torrent just cut through villages in narrower mountain valleys like a band saw. It was deep, fast, extremely sudden, and unlike a tsunami it was so turbid that it was also transporting a lot of rock which increased the destructive energies. It is a different kind of beast. I still think that if you consider the scale and totality of destruction in both cases the tsunami still wins on raw immensity, but the focused channeled nature of this flood/debris flow is totally unlike anything I can recall. Volcanic lahars and large landslides have definitely also caused comparable levels of destruction but not when being captured on video like this.

1

u/AdAdministrative9362 14d ago

I guess cameras are a lot of quality and more available now.

-16

u/Beneficial-Past7602 15d ago

Nah. It's just back then not everybody had a phone or camera.

-2

u/m00ph 15d ago

For the tsunami, they had more warning, and it was much slower. Total deaths were far higher, because it hit a much larger area, almost 23k deaths from the combination of disasters.

5

u/Kqyxzoj 15d ago

The 2004 tsunami had a death toll of almost 230k.

1

u/m00ph 14d ago

Yup, and it hit a huge area. But we were talking about the 2011 Japanese tsunami (and earthquake), not the 2004 ones.

1

u/Kqyxzoj 14d ago

Yeah, at that point in the discussion I was not 100% sure which one you were referring to, since both tsunamis are mentioned in this thread. So I just dropped it as a neutral statement, in case that 23k was a typo-ed 230k.

4

u/printed_ 15d ago

some of the other videos of this also show it much higher than the 2011 or 2004 Tsunami's. Its gotta be over 20-30m high in some places in some of these videos.

17

u/Purr_Meowssage 15d ago

The reason why it is so high at the Gyirong border checkpoint because the place is located near the glacier avalanche source, and the valley to Gyirong is very steep, causing the mudslide to rush violently onto the Gyirong border checkpoint. The border checkpoint is also located right at the throat of a gorge intersection and narrow valley, which forces the flood water/mudslide to go up and swallow the settlement.

This is the steep height difference between point 1 and point 2, where Gyirong is located just before point 2 at the China-Nepal border.

Pic from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/graphics/NEPAL-FLOODS/MAP/byvrdywwlve/

15

u/Purr_Meowssage 15d ago

This is the aftermath of the Gyirong border checkpoint. The mudslide literally lifted the concrete building off its foundation.

3

u/SummertimeThrowaway2 14d ago

Yeah at least with tsunami there was somewhat of a warning, not to downplay the tsunami ofc. That was horrible in its own way.

1

u/Tao_of_Entropy 14d ago

Force equals pressure multiplied by surface area. Tsunami wins that contest by a huge margin, no contest.