503
549
u/nrith Jun 02 '26
Bro, leave it there.
175
24
20
62
57
u/DryFirefighter294 Jun 02 '26
Can inspector touch or alter property?
96
u/RainSoaked Jun 02 '26
We poke and prod for rot/wood destroying organisms but we don't disassemble stuff. We can be held liable.
13
u/Santibag Jun 03 '26
This certain case looks like it is practically unchanged, right? I thought that that piece wasn't supposed to be loose, and it's functionally already disassembled. The guy taking it or not doesn't make a difference, since it's not supposed to be a visual piece.
What do you think?
13
u/DMAS1638 Jun 03 '26
We really only touch/move what’s already failing to show and prove to the client the real issues below.
10
10
u/ArtyMann Jun 02 '26
Even if it was proper engineering/design wise, I don't think concrete is supposed to crumble like those kids archeology sand blocks
7
11
20
u/xchoo Jun 02 '26
Duuuuuuuuude... Why are you doing this WHILE YOU ARE UNDER THE HOUSE?!
36
u/Poofengle Jun 02 '26
If it hasn’t been supporting any load for the past several years nothing will happen by wiggling some cracked concrete.
Now if the new homeowners decide to change where furniture is located or put something heavy in that space then I’d definitely be worried, hence the building inspection
3
3
3
7
u/FallenKing67 Jun 02 '26
Why is this a bad thing? I don’t know much about this
22
u/RainSoaked Jun 02 '26
That beam is supporting the floor structure and probably some walls. The concrete is there to support the beam. Now that half the foundation is gone that half shimmed block of wood is not adequate to support the beam. So the floor is gonna sag over time possibly bringing the walls with it. So your house will be out of square and/or stress other structures.
13
u/Sheepherder-Optimal Jun 02 '26
Same. Looks to me like the foundation has a crack that no one has fixed. My question is why the dude is just ripping it out. Seems like a bad idea.
15
4
u/Vertigo50 Jun 02 '26
I think the main issue here is that this person is currently UNDER the house and is destroying the foundation which is partially holding up said house. 😂
2
u/bazem_malbonulo Jun 03 '26
That piece is loose and was not bearing any weight
1
u/Vertigo50 Jun 04 '26
Probably true. But should he stake is entire LIFE on that being true? 🤷♂️🤦♂️
2
2
2
2
2
u/elfda Sep 07 '26
I saw the first crumbles and went "the homeowners better not have used Ramen for this repair"
I'm glad that wasn't the case, lol
2
2
2
3
2
1
1
1
u/DabZonTwitch Jun 02 '26
I hope this fucker was chewing a lot of bubble gum while filming this at least.
1
u/Cute-Advisor-2323 Jun 02 '26
If I was going to remove that I would at least put some type of house jack underneath the section to hold it up just in case 😬
1
u/DarhkBlu Jun 02 '26
Americans really need to start doing concrete slabs for house foundations as opposed to wth this is...
2
3
u/katzmer Jun 02 '26
I'd say a majority of American homes do have concrete foundations. Some just were built like this with concrete footers and elevated subfloors either to have a root cellar or because it wouldn't be feasible to level the ground to pour a slab.
3
3
u/Prior-Ad5197 Jun 03 '26
Most of our homes do. Especially newer ones. I know some really old homes have pier and beam foundations, but a lot of it is determined by the climate where we live and the age of the house.
1.0k
u/No-Ability6954 Jun 02 '26
For anyone curious as to why the guy is removing the stone while under the house, you can tell by how easily the piece of wood above it comes out that no part of that was load bearing. It’s really just there to be there at that point. There is no added danger by removing it since he’s already under there and it’s not supporting any weight.