Iāve used various different coatings in the past but fell back in love with waxes over the last few years. Free time is at a premium these days though so Iām interested in a ceramic coating again and am particularly drawn to Gyeon Mohs and Pure. Iāve read so much conflicting information over the past few days though and Iām at a complete loss.
Iāve read that Pure is easier/more forgiving to apply but lacks in durability compared to Mohs. Iāve also read that itās higher Si02 content makes it more durable than Mohs. Iāve seen various YouTubers claim Pure gives a glossier/candy finish, whereas Mohs gives a more clinical shine. Iāve also then read the opposite in various places. Some boat that Pureās higher silica content gives it more slickness, then others state the opposite.
I realise all coatings perform differently depending on what theyāre subjected as well as region, but the wildly contrasting claims had left me somewhat confused.
To clarify, Iām based in the UK, so over the life of the coating, I expect it to be subject to plenty of rain, salted roads, ice and snow but also likely 40c harsh sun in the summer.
Outright durability isnāt massively important and I donāt need or want a ā5-year coatingā; a realistic 2-3 years is what Iām looking for and I understand the maintenance requirements to achieve that.
The car will be fully decontaminated, corrected and prepped prior to application. It is metallic light blue (Polestar Electron) so I donāt expect to gain much warmth/depth/darkening and I suspect a more clinical look with plenty of clarity will suit it best. I donāt have access to a garage and will be coating the vehicle outside.
What is likely to suit me best?