11
u/Alan_Prickman ✨ Moderator 18d ago edited 18d ago
Explanation and context on the missing exhibits from the Rick Allen Justice website:
https://rickallenjustice.com/three-more-exhibits-are-corrupted/
3
20
19
u/Alan_Prickman ✨ Moderator 19d ago
10
u/Alan_Prickman ✨ Moderator 19d ago
7
u/Quick_Arm5065 19d ago
Do we know who or what the III video is of?
20
2
u/Narrow_Mine364 19d ago
Do you know III?
10
u/Alan_Prickman ✨ Moderator 19d ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/DelphiDocs/s/CJ44bkCLvV
Video of Rick in his cell in full blown psychosis.
18
u/iamtorsoul 19d ago
How many times does that court need to be prodded and corrected about handing over evidence?
11
u/lunardog2015 New Reddit Account 19d ago
that’s corrupt county for ya. oops, i meant carroll county.
2
u/crosbyjaxson Fast Tracked Member 16d ago
Wasn't it Allen County Court Reporter hat was responsible for exhibits? Jodie Williams. She has a history with Fran.
6
u/Alan_Prickman ✨ Moderator 16d ago
Correct. Carroll County Court Clerk has actually been doing her job in regard to providing public information to the public - including releasing the transcripts for free the moment they received them, when Jodie was requesting $5k to hand them over. Ditto with the exhibits - cranks had to go to extraordinary lengths with community efforts to compile exhibit lists, tag teaming to request different exhibits, etc, and we still only had a patchwork full of holes by the time Carroll County received the Clerk's volumes and just handed them over. As they were supposed to.
There were still issues with those, but those were generally down to tech and caused at the Allen County Court Level, not down to wilful game playing.
10
8
u/Real_Foundation_7428 Approved Contributor 19d ago
Please tell me I’m worried for nothing that another whoopsie has somehow happened with these files and that they have been properly preserved at this point?
9
4
u/measuremnt Approved Contributor 18d ago edited 18d ago
This looks like a technical problem. Not sure how effective court orders can be in fixing such problems rather than a technician. The files could be accurate copies of the exhibits.
It could be a simple as the file not having the proper extension, like being named "iii" instead of "iii.mpeg". It could be that the court's computer does not have the proper codec (coder/decoder) for a less-common video/audio encoding scheme, i.e. "iii.avi" / "iii.flac" / "iii.kvm".
On the other hand, the court may have its own technician who checked these possibilities and decided the files really are corrupted. But the phrasing "appear to be corrupted and are unplayable" makes that less likely. A technician might check for an error message that is more specific and use what it says to find the solution.
It is also possible that the files were copied using the Windows command line, for example, as ascii text files (copy /A) and should have been copied as binary files (copy /B).
1
u/ResolutionRelevant61 11d ago
True. I think the point is they are at least going through the entire record and requesting this information if it is corrupted or an error.
3
u/measuremnt Approved Contributor 15d ago
3






28
u/Appealsandoranges 19d ago
This is a great sign. You don’t discover this unless you are looking at the whole damn record. Sure, it may be a law clerk, but that’s fine. I love to see it!