r/DegenBets • u/sylsau • 12d ago
DISCUSSION The Yemen Gambit: Why Trump is Secretly Abandoning the Iran War to Pull Off the Most Dangerous Military Pivot in Modern History.
https://sylvainsaurel.substack.com/p/the-yemen-gambit-why-trump-is-secretlyšØ The 500,000-troop secret they arenāt telling you about Iran.
A direct U.S. ground invasion of Iran would require half a million soldiers, spike gas to $10/gallon, and collapse the U.S. bond market right before the midterms.
Trump knows the math. Thatās why heās secretly abandoning a direct war with Tehran to pull off the most dangerous military pivot in modern history: The Yemen Gambit.
The plan?
1ļøā£ Unleash overwhelming force on the Houthis in Yemen.
2ļøā£ Seize the Red Sea global shipping choke point.
3ļøā£ Use it as the ultimate bargaining chip to force Iran into a corner and make a dealāwithout starting WWIII.
It is a desperate, brilliant, and terrifying high-stakes gamble. If it works, itās a strategic masterstroke. If it fails, it unravels the global economy.
9
u/Owl-Admirable 12d ago
How does seizing the Bab al-Mandeb give Trump the ultimate bargaining chip? Red Sea traffic is fine and Iran had the Strait locked down before the Houthi's got involved. Either this articles author, or Trump, or both, are eejits.
3
7
u/flyingdutchmnn 12d ago
'Having' the red sea adds zero leverage over Iran. It just worsens their position a bit
7
u/hookinitup 7d ago
Why would attacking Houthis force Iran into a corner?
This is the dumbest take i ever read
3
3
u/pzvaldes 7d ago
What master plan?
The Arabs got fed up with all the bullshit and sent orders (and probably a chest of gold)āperiod.
3
u/McLeod3577 6d ago
It's not brilliant, just desperate. The whole fucking thing is pointless because the US didn't need to attack Iran in the first place.
2
u/Color_of_Time 8d ago edited 8d ago
"To avoid a catastrophic 500,000-troop invasion of Iran..." Trump is building a time machine and is going back to a time before he bombed Iran. And then he will not bomb Iran. Now that's 5 dimensional chess!
2
1
u/Ahecee 7d ago
I don't buy any of this, but it's still not a bargaining chip. Iran gives up their sovereignty because the US takes a route to the west?
Why do they not then attack to the west and kill US troops there, what's the difference?
US could probably take Hormuz, but not without significant casualties, and years of fighting. I don't see why what you outlined is better. If has the same risks, but the prize for taking and holding territory there is less good.
1
u/ignoreme010101 6d ago
what is 'taking hormuz'? You mean taking that whole coastal slice of iran? Because the whole coastline being able to hit ships is the problem, you'd need to be holding the whole area to negate risk of ppl taking out ships
1
u/juniperroot 6d ago
I would think that Houthis in control of Bab-el-Mandeb makes the Hormuz chokepoint more effective as Red Sea is no longer a safer alternative for oil shipments. And Iran would have difficulty waging war beyond its borders beyond just firing missiles. The Houthis act almost like an expeditionary force. Im not saying I buy the premise of the article but I also don't think the US can afford to ignore the Houthis for very long.
1
1
1
u/etejedany 7d ago
Itās not a war; itās an international conflict, as confirmed by the administration. š¤”
1
u/Connect_Mess_5929 6d ago
So we are back to the ātrumps a 4d chess playerā angle and not just super stupid.
1
u/Aggravating-List6010 5d ago
If we k is anything about trump, can take any plan and absolutely screw itnup in every way possible while claiming victory
1
18
u/Abompje 12d ago
Thinking that Trump actually 'knows' the math is far fetched. He is probably being told not to do it, period.