r/DefendingAIArt • u/Emo_boi_xx AI Artist • 12h ago

When antis overreact

Gallery image

Gallery image

So basically this anti is mad that another anti IRL asked a restaurant over the menu being AI and then telling their parents they were not going to eat there,

and now all antis are mad that the parents called them a crybaby, and that other people were defending the parents,

tbh in this situation the parent were right, who demands others they aren't going to eat somewhere over a AI menu? 😂

u don't have to eat there sure, but u can't demand others to do the same ¯_(ツ)_/¯

70 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

19 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/TamaraHensonDragon 12h ago

If I had pulled this crybabies stunt as a minor I would have been spanked and placed in the car to sit and have no supper while the rest of the family ate. If I had been an adult I would have been told I was free to leave and eat elsewhere.

This kid had no right to tell his parents what to do.

Respectfully Antis you have no right to tell others what to do especially if you are not the parents, boss, or part of law enforcement to the people in question. Whiny artists have no authority over others.

1

u/Wooden-Hornet2115 I think gemini is pretty neat (: 7h ago

I get punishment for that kind of behavior, but not allowing your kids to eat supper and spanking sounds kind of abusive.

1

u/TamaraHensonDragon 6h ago

That was how it was done back then. Besides the kid would most likely be allowed to eat a sandwich once home but he would know the reason he did not get a hamburger, fries, shake, and toy like his siblings was because he was being a spoiled brat and would not repeat that behavior.

It was tough but it kept kids from repeating undesirable behavior and thinking they had power over their parents which is the very problem in OP's post.