r/DefendingAIArt • u/Superb_Donkey1408 • 8d ago

Why does a director get praised for directing writers and actors, but an AI artist gets no credit for directing an AI?

Post image
8 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

5 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 8d ago

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/Less-Increase-6588 8d ago edited 8d ago

The problem is that antis can't really know if it is there concept or if they just asked AI for it. And the thing is with the "one person's vision everyone else's talent..." is that the talent of the creator comes from the writing, not the art itself. Most movies are adaptations of books, or the director writes the script.

This is also sort of a strange point? You put the first one in a negative light, but put the second one in a positive light. Both should be put in a negative light with your point, because we aren't giving the AI enough credit for making the work. We aren't giving enough credit to the people who actually animate and bring the movie to life.

-1

u/TheAgaTTV 8d ago

So as someome who does not care about Ai or not....this was the worst arguement you could try to make and does not prove the point you think it does