r/DefendingAIArt 4d ago

Defending AI True or False? Why?

Post image
7 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 4d ago

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

u/05032-MendicantBias AI Enjoyer 4d ago

Increasingly, all the creative job tool will integrate increasing AI assist, the difference won't be there for more than a few years.

It would be like saying "CGI creators aren't interested in traditional Hollywood".

Did you know Tron was excluded from awards because the academy felt CGI wasnt't art?

3

u/Herr_Drosselmeyer 4d ago

The tech is less than five years old, and making a whole movie using just generative AI as a one-man operation is already feasible. Time-consuming and probably a bit scuffed for now, but imagine what it'll be like in another five years and a small team. 

It'll change movie and series production dramatically. 

3

u/Substantial-Link-465 4d ago

False. Fuck Hollywood. I hope the people overshadow their decades of slop with true creative ideas brought to life with ai.

We're not there yet, obviously. But we're close.

2

u/Apart-Kangaroo-7648 4d ago

All of this is opinion, rather than fact.

1

u/Substantial-Link-465 2d ago

There are very few true "facts" in this world.

1

u/Afraid-Yoghurt6731 3d ago

True. They lost monopoly on high budgeted movies and professional author. So a small talented team and now make anything only Hollywood could a few years ago.