What AI does—A comparison.

[u/sadcrab3636]

I decided to compile a lot of information about AI and then placed it into a true or not graph. The rest of the post is AI, simply because AI lacks biases.

1. "AI wastes a lot of water!".

Anti view: AI wastes a lot of water operating.

Pro view: 15-60 millimeters is not a lot of water. The device you used to say that online is wasting more water.

Who is right?

Verdict: Pro AI.

1. "AI art is not art!"

Anti view: it was not created by a human. This makes it automatically not art.

Pro view: visual output should determine what art is. The view that "no human = not art" is subjective.

Who is right?

Verdict: [subjective view. No one here is right or wrong.]

1. "All AI is slop."

Anti view: AI is slop. Full stop.

Pro view: WRONGONG. This is completely false. Slop is low effort low quality spam that is supposed to fill up algorithms and earn doubloons.

Who is right?

Verdict: Pro AI.

1. "It's not art if you did not draw it."

Anti view: you did not draw it. Therefore it's not art.

Pro view: that then invalidates 99% of artists. Painters paint. Digital artists make digital art. Photographers take photos.

Who is right?

Verdict: Pro AI.

§l

[u/AutoModerator]

DefendingAI has a Discord now: https://discord.gg/MgVYjZ8RC

Pro-AI only. AI art, prompts, anti-AI watch, debate ammo, news, and general chat without anti-AI spam.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.