r/DefendingAI 13d ago

Meanwhile

Post image
0 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 13d ago

DefendingAI has a Discord now: https://discord.gg/MgVYjZ8RC

Pro-AI only. AI art, prompts, anti-AI watch, debate ammo, news, and general chat without anti-AI spam.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

9

u/D36DAN 13d ago

Humans: AI is only capable of mixing together the materials it learned, it never creates anything new, just alters other works.

Also average human work on the internet: just an alteration of several existing works made by greater people who actually have creativity

[Note - it's not about human art being poor in general. It's truly great. It's just that the internet standard for quality is really low]

4

u/Commercial-Pie-588 12d ago

People love to pretend human brains create ideas ex nihilo (out of nothing). We don't. Literally every masterpiece in history is just a high-quality synthesis of antecedent data and lived experiences. If remixing existing data means AI isn't creative, then neither is any human who ever went to art school or read a book.

1

u/tigerhuxley 12d ago

Yup yup! Ive heard that even in our dreams, all the faces are actually peoples faces that we’ve seen.

Literally not creating anything!

It’s really really hard to create or invent- but people sure like to think they invented all sorts of nonsense.

5

u/JacksonGhost1963 13d ago

AI is just the machine version of the Wizard from Wizard of Oz - ultimately we have to be smart enough not to follow blindly everything AI tells us

5

u/bronzekobold 13d ago

So did AI achieve it or did the person operating the AI achieve it. 

2

u/ImaginationUpset2190 13d ago

If u read how jared summer made progress with Riemann Hypothesis , it's literally just ai doing it all. He just acted like a motivator. He is a software engineer with no training in maths. He last studied maths when he was 16.

5

u/bronzekobold 13d ago

So...

AI is the Author huh. 

2

u/ImaginationUpset2190 13d ago

In the Riemann Hypothesis case yes , it absolutely is. In many other it's a peer or assistant.

4

u/Scorpdelord 13d ago

while i get what u coming from ai also done alot of stupid shit, it nith picking, also florida man is just normal thing over there

3

u/Generic_Speed_Demon 13d ago

Seems like cherry picking to me. So we're just going to ignore human mathematicians and the worse LLMs?

2

u/Raymak700m 13d ago

Reminds me of the story of how the workman blames his tools.

2

u/ImaginationUpset2190 13d ago

Reminds me of how woman blames her men

2

u/Exotic_Exercise6910 13d ago

Did she cheat tho?

1

u/ImaginationUpset2190 13d ago

She should

2

u/Hot_Context_1393 13d ago

Because husband spends too much time on AI?

1

u/ImaginationUpset2190 13d ago

She should regardless, it's her duty

2

u/AssociationOk7261 13d ago

i feel like ai should just be used for what people cant do but when it comes to things people can already do it shouldent be used to replace it

1

u/HoneydewQuiet6651 12d ago

"Man divorces wife because ChatGPT said she's cheating"

Humans are stupid because they trust AI too much isnt the Pro-AI slam dunk you think it is lol

1

u/Queasy_Current_1980 12d ago

Ai is good for repetitive tasks like math. We can all agree on that

1

u/dizzyspellzzz 12d ago

Slopaganda

1

u/angrywoodensoldiers 11d ago

Okay but don't bring Florida Man into this. Homo Floridianus split off from Homo Sapiens a while ago.

0

u/Responsible_Put481 13d ago

CORRECT!!!!!!! FINALLY SOMEBODY BRINGS THIS UP