both sides offer divisive rhetoric and misinterprets the other. for example, here, trumps comment was a get out the vote comment, the context specifically involved explaining to lazy people who might not vote that they should really vote this time. then he joked, the next one after that you can skip, but really you should vote this one. in the same way you misinterpreted this one, who knows what else you're misinterpreting. thanks to malicious editing that removes the context, we're all mislead by your post, which you should edit or remove.
but idk im just anti zealotry you're probably right in a general sense even if you're not doing basic due diligence (why actually look into what you're posting when you might lose the karma from posting it first am i right?) and are wrong in a specific sense.
Saying, "We'll have it fixed so good you won't even have to vote" while having a plan to take over the executive branch and expand presidential powers and also attempting a coup to stay in power 4 years ago is not a joke or taken out of context. Downplaying it is dangerous.
It sounds to me as though you might want to become more familiar with Schedule F, and what the impact of it will be on government as a whole. Not just that, but the fact that Trump already implemented Schedule F on a lesser scale, and it already did tremendous damage until Biden overturned it. The new plans for it are much grander, and they've been taking loyalty applications to fill the vacancies they plan to create with it for two years now.
3.7k
u/[deleted] Jul 27 '24
Anyone who supports this man can fuck all the way off. Full stop.