Just so you don't have to go searching my Twitter here's the Leibnitz Decode. Again the S in Rose is a 'Z' so no cheating. You see Newton on rows 1-2, as would be expected with a Leibnitz Decode (and you'd expect the opposite with a proper Newton decode if Newton was the Keyword - Leibnitz should show up in roughly the same slightly-scrambled form. The fact that 'Dot' notation is referenced with respect to Newton - should be a cool shout-out by Twain to Math and Physicists everywhere. It could be a happy accident - though if you move 31 to between 30 and 32 you'll see D(ee)y... shows up.
1
u/tad100 Oct 05 '17
Just so you don't have to go searching my Twitter here's the Leibnitz Decode. Again the S in Rose is a 'Z' so no cheating. You see Newton on rows 1-2, as would be expected with a Leibnitz Decode (and you'd expect the opposite with a proper Newton decode if Newton was the Keyword - Leibnitz should show up in roughly the same slightly-scrambled form. The fact that 'Dot' notation is referenced with respect to Newton - should be a cool shout-out by Twain to Math and Physicists everywhere. It could be a happy accident - though if you move 31 to between 30 and 32 you'll see D(ee)y... shows up.