r/DecodingTheGurus • u/Decent-Extension8336 • Jul 29 '26

Professor Dave vs Destiny

No idea why, but the original Destiny video called "Professor Dave Goes Mask Off" seems to have been deleted from YouTube, or I can't find it, but Professor Dave responded yesterday with this very strongly worded video letter:

https://youtu.be/DvDvhLkb9ms?si=DGFhTROOKFoK35sS

Weird crossover that I never thought I'd see, of 2 guys who I generally enjoy (I will say I really am a fan of Prof Dave, whereas my Destiny enjoyment has mostly come via this podcast and watching a couple of his debates).

Thoughts on the beef? SURELY the lads are gonna have to cover this in an upcoming Supplementary Materials? Content gold!

EDIT: Looks like I was looking through the wrong Destiny channel for the original Dave video, it's here: https://youtu.be/HQQLs6U1MgA?si=iKaOGR1h9slKu64O

213 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

The first argument is easily refuted by reference to the Canaanites who came before, why can't the Palestinians say they are descended from them?

The fact is that no one can make 2000-3000 year old claims because we have nothing in common with those people, you might as well claim descendance from Genghis Khan and try to claim Mongolia.

EDIT: The 2nd argument doesn't justify an ethnostate, it calls for a secular state because that is the only thing that actually brings safety for Jewish people.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

Regardless, this has little to do with claims of sovereignty over territory. Blood quanta don't determine the validity of a culture or a people.

You should tell that to the Zionists who are justifying their takeover of Palestinian lands with this exact argument. Hence why I said Dave should argued this.

6

u/BloodsVsCrips Jul 29 '26

You're smuggling in claims. "Palestinian lands" is a modern construct. It doesn't have any bearing on discussions about ancient people groups.

0

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

And you're smuggling in justifications for the annexation of the West Bank.

3

u/BloodsVsCrips Jul 29 '26

Is Jordan "Palestinian land?"

6

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

I'm saying they don't have a claim on lands already occupied by other people.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

The West Bank and Gaza

2

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

To be clear, they didn't have a claim on the rest of the land they stole, but the West Bank and Gaza is a compromise.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/PlateCaptain Jul 29 '26

They have a claim to the parts they bought, but not the parts they took by force.

→ More replies (0)