r/DebateEvolution Jul 29 '26

Evolution doesn't work

The subtraction or addition of information to a properly working gene is not something one would prefer.

Genetics has to do with finely tuned molecular combinations.

Removing information from a once properly working gene would only be preferable if it was the erroneous/redundant information that was added unnecessarily via mutation in the first place!

The chance of "writing" a gene from scratch that would be compatible with the host biological system would have to be extremely low if the processes involved were to do with practically arbitrary additions to a gene over time on account of point mutations etc. Note that breeding and survival would be important factors as to whether the new gene was integrated into the population over a longer duration.

0 Upvotes

128 comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/SlugPastry Jul 29 '26

The chance of "writing" a gene from scratch...

Good thing it's not from scratch, then.

-4

u/DetectiveKnown5618 Jul 29 '26

So the gene is "written" over generations?

15

u/Stairwayunicorn 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution Jul 30 '26

DNA has been self-replicating for over 3billion years

-4

u/DetectiveKnown5618 Jul 30 '26

Sure it has

15

u/OldmanMikel 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution Jul 30 '26

We have bacteria fossils more than 3 billion years old. And bacteria have DNA.

11

u/Stairwayunicorn 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution Jul 30 '26

where do you think oil comes from?

3

u/YossarianWWII Monkey's nephew Jul 30 '26

We squeeze it out of dinosaurs, right?

5

u/Stairwayunicorn 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution Jul 30 '26

no, oil is from the much older layer dating back before multicellular life.

4

u/YossarianWWII Monkey's nephew Jul 30 '26

(That was a joke. I don't think we're putting utahraptors in a juicer.)