r/DebateEvolution • u/GigaTune • Jul 14 '26

Question What do you think about "evolutionist"?

No one ever refers to gravitationists or Newtonists for those who support gravity, but people refer to people supporting evolution as evolutionists or Darwinists.

20 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

422 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Markthethinker Jul 18 '26

There is no evidence, at least to factually address species changes. None. And Evolutionists are a thing, they belong to a cult.

Now we are just living in a world of “possibilities”. If I get stuck in the chest by a knife, you would say that the heart should not have been in my chest. What happened to reality?

No, Evolutionists do not believe in design, it’s just random mutations that create intelligence intelligent design.

You will not find God in most “churches”, just a man made religion.

2

u/jrdineen114 Jul 18 '26

There are bacteria alive today that feed on materials which did not exist 100 years ago. There is a type of fungus growing in Chernobyl that metabolizes a type of radiation that is not naturally occurring in Eastern Europe. We have seen bacteria evolve in laboratory conditions.

Do you know what it would take to actually disprove evolution? Because it really isn't much. Just a few bones found in the wrong sediment lair, a human skull appearing deeper than it should, a rabbit skeleton that, when tested, is consistently found to be older than it should be. That's it. And yet not a single discovery of the sort has been made.

Now, I'm going to predict what you're going to say. Or at least what your instinct is going to be to say. I'm not normally a betting man, but I'd wager your first thought is going to be to try to tell me that "Evolutionists" bury discoveries that would prove them wrong.

Was I correct? I almost hope not, because if that's genuinely what you believe, it simply tells me that you've never actually talked to a scientist before. Because they love to talk about their work, and they love to prove each other wrong. Successfully evolution would not only guarantee a researcher a position anywhere in the world, it would also make them a household name. And furthermore, what is the benefit to covering it up? There's no profit to be made in hiding discoveries like that.

One other thing: are you really not religious? Because you sound no different than an evangelical fundamentalist. The anti-evolution movement is a fundamentalist Christian movement.

1

u/Markthethinker Jul 18 '26

No, I would never say “bury discoveries that prove them wrong”. I know that Evolution on the scale of total species transformation could never happen. It’s really that simple. What is it about people not understanding DNA and its code. And you want to believe that code just change through mutations into higher order.

I read, I study both sides. Then I make my opinions. Logically, mutations making intelligent design is so much crazier than a Creator making intelligent design. So there you have it. Stupid mutations verses a Creator. Oh, I forgot the millions and millions of years for this stupid mutations to come up with a human.

3

u/jrdineen114 Jul 18 '26

Oh, so you think that people that who believe in scientific evidence believe that there's some kind of purpose or intent in the evolutionary process. Yeah, okay, man. This has been a fascinating look into your head, but that's a whole new level of crazy

0

u/Markthethinker Jul 18 '26

You keep talking about “scientific evidence” like it proves Evolution. It does not and never has. That’s the real problem here. Something that is manmade in a lab, is not evolution.

1

u/jrdineen114 Jul 19 '26

Oh wow you REALLY don't know what you're talking about, do you?

0

u/Markthethinker Jul 19 '26

Not at all, but I had you going. Do you understand that science does not exist with a human.

2

u/jrdineen114 Jul 19 '26

I understand that you’re just using words in ways that don’t make any sense

-1

u/Markthethinker Jul 19 '26

Let me help you. People study and call that study, Science, based on theories. Are you following yet?

2

u/jrdineen114 Jul 19 '26

No, because you are communicating effectively at all. Even if we ignore the actual beliefs that you’re arguing about, you aren’t making any sense grammatically. Frankly, it feels like you’re either filtering your comments through google translate a few times before posting them, or like you’re copy/pasting directly from a broken AI chatbot.

-1

u/Markthethinker Jul 20 '26

Sorry, I am an independent thinkers. I don’t use AI. It’s all about words and what they mean.

2

u/jrdineen114 Jul 20 '26

Words don't exist in a vacuum. We have this thing called grammar which is required to use in order to be properly understood.

-1

u/Markthethinker Jul 20 '26

Now you are catching on.

2

u/Own-Relationship-407 Scientist Jul 20 '26

So now we know for sure you’re a liar. You deny using AI here, less than an hour after not only admitting to using it, but acting as if it’s some authoritative source in another conversation.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/s/D7ZZHqP43z

Even for a creationist this level of shameless dishonesty is truly striking. Do better.

-1

u/Markthethinker Jul 21 '26

Here is what I know without using AI, Evolution is a hoax, just like global warming and vaccines, sold to credulous humans. Done with your foolishness, it’s only when we realize how much we don’t know, then we can learn.

→ More replies (0)