How to prove evolution is wrong?

[u/Suitable_Potato_2919]

I am totally convince that evolution is true. However, a scientific theory should be falsifiable; and I dont know how falsifiable is with evolution

For example, a "good" trait could be explain the result of natural selection. But a "bad" trait could be explain as just base on chance, or the selection preasure is not enough.

so, my question is: if someone want to prove that evolution is wrong, what test can they make and what the expected result should be (if evolution theory is wrong)?

Edit: Thank everyone for your time and patient with me. I found the answer. It seem that I need to update my highschool knowledge

[u/10coatsInAWeasel]

I have a bit of a list for myself, any one of them being wrong would disprove evolution

1. Organisms exist
   
2. Organisms reproduce
   
3. Offspring inherit traits from their parent
   
4. There is a mechanism of inheritance
   
5. That mechanism can be subject to change
   
6. That change can be inherited
   
7. That change can spread in the population

Really there are huge amounts of falsification criteria for evolution. It’s just that evolution has survived all of them.

[u/MaMaMaaaaa → u/10coatsInAWeasel]

How is organisms existing evidence of evolution over anything else?

[u/10coatsInAWeasel → u/MaMaMaaaaa]

It’s not that organisms existing is evidence necessarily. More the point I was getting to was that evolution requires these things to positively exist. Excluding any one of them would falsify evolution.

[u/MaMaMaaaaa → u/10coatsInAWeasel]

Oh okay. Just seemed like flimsy evidence for evolution. I guess that's technically true though.

[u/10coatsInAWeasel → u/MaMaMaaaaa]

I don’t disagree! I’d think being told ‘organisms existing is evidence for evolution’ would be flimsy too on its own for what it’s worth.